Eric Dubay's YouTube Channel Taken Down

Admin wrote:They banned the Ball Earth Skeptics Interview and my Voluntaryist Rap.  I will be making them available again soon once I get everything re-uploaded elsewhere.

I have the Ball Earth Skeptics interview, I just uploaded it to my channel here...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GWh1hAwi9mE&feature=youtu.be

YouTube has just removed my video "Free Your Mind ft. Eric Dubay, Kenneth O'Keefe" which has been up for a year and I have now recieved a community guideline strike.

I just got this in an email. My Vimeo account only had a handful of videos that had been disappearing from corporate thug, GooTube's pages; Sandy Hook choir rubbing our noses in it at Temple Superbowl halftime extravaganza, the video exposing Steere for interviewing the daughter (Croatioa Girl, who "thinks in English") that Sargent-- according to his own publicly read bio, DOESN'T have, etc.

I received NO warning. Just gone.



I can't imagine the emotions Eric went through when corporate thug, GooTube, deleted years worth of loving effort. It hurts like heck, and I only had a few videos I believed were in a safe repository. The Orwellian noose is being tightened around our necks in an exponential speed. The only question is, when will they be able to begin arresting us for mere words on cyberspace paper?

I looked in Shills, Trolls, and Controlled Opposition, and didn't really see anything that I thought would be a better place to post this. Am I missing it, or is it not time to create a thread specifically for, CORPORATE JACK-BOOTED THUGS SUPPRESSING FREE SPEECH?

If we already have that thread and I missed it, Admin please move this to the appropriate thread.

WHO CONTROLS AMERICA? WHO CONTROLS GOOGLE?
thezog.wordpress.com/who-controls-google/

“SIX MILLION JEWS 1915-1938 HD” (i.e., World War One)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcXrKnaaJA0

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize” —attributed to several

Google— hands out, palms up:
https://subsidytracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/alphabet-inc
“Subsidy, noun, a grant or gift of money" —Merriam-Webster Dictionary

They're coming after Stefan Molyneux as well. 12 years on YouTube and he's one strike away from them deleting all his work. (Note: Just like Alex Jones, I don't agree with everything Stefan says, but will fight for his right to say it)

Admin wrote:
They're coming after Stefan Molyneux as well.  
12 years on YouTube and he's one strike away from them deleting all his work.  
(Note: Just like Alex Jones, I don't agree with everything Stefan says, but will fight for his right to say it)

As we should suspect, Stefan further states, that after posting to "Twitter" about his two strikes (2), his YouTube channel was restored.

LETTER SENT TO VIMEO RE THE ABOVE CHANNEL TAKE-DOWN NOTICE:

[Edit: I first sent the following to try and elicit a response. They ignored it over a 16 hour period, and since I suppose they are busy little beavers going about their days looking for somebody who has had the audacity to say "boo" in a video posted to their site, I was not much in the mood for waiting on the fascist thugs to respond to my 'try honey' approach. I first wrote to Vimeo, "Please provide the offending video and/or language that was determined to "incite hatred, or include discriminatory or defamatory speech." I would like to save non-offending material and preserve my channel by removing the offending material to meet your guidelines. Thank you]

THIS MORNING I THEN SENT:

Regarding the deletion of my channel based on a spurious, shotgun blast that you do “not allow videos that harass, incite hatred, or include discriminatory or defamatory speech,” please read the below how the supreme Court weighs in on the issue.

You have clearly allowed others, who find inconvenient truths an unpleasant thing, to stomp on my right to express myself in the public square, regardless of what they think about my opinion.

Further, you have NOT DEFINED the offending material or words to justify your actions.

Moral rectitude demands, and the supreme Court unequivocally makes clear, that your actions are reprehensible, and if you have even a bit of moral rectitude, and do not wish to conduct your affairs according to the will of a rabble mob, small or large, you will do what is right and restore my channel and content.

ELSE, DEFINE SPECIFICALLY THE WORDS/CONTENT YOU FIND SO EGREGIOUS, AND RESTORE MY CHANNEL, SANS ANY SUCH CONTENT YOU CAN OBJECTIVELY DEFINE AND USE TO JUSTIFY CENSURE, WHICH YOU BELIEVE GIVES YOU COVER TO PLAY FASCIST CORPORATE SPEECH SUPPRESSING THUG.

Sincerely, Mark Wilson


The below rulings of the supreme Court are taken from www.thoughtco.com/hate-speech-cases-721215

Terminiello v. Chicago (1949)

[F]reedom of speech...," Justice William O. Douglas wrote for the 5-4 majority, is "protected against censorship or punishment, unless shown likely to reduce a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, or unrest ... There is no room under our Constitution for a more restrictive view."

Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)

Writing for the unanimous Court, Justice William Brennan argued that "the constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action."

National Socialist Party v. Skokie (1977)

When the National Socialist Party of America, better known as Nazis, was declined a permit to speak in Chicago, the organizers sought a permit from the suburban city of Skokie, where one-sixth of the town's population was made up of families that had survived the Holocaust. County authorities attempted to block the Nazi march in court, citing a city ban on wearing Nazi uniforms and displaying swastikas.

But the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower ruling that the Skokie ban was unconstitutional. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court, where the justices declined to hear the case, in essence allowing the lower court's ruling to become law. After the ruling, the city of Chicago granted the Nazis three permits to march; the Nazis, in turn, decided to cancel their plans to march in Skokie.

Virginia v. Black (2003)

"[A] State may choose to prohibit only those forms of intimidation," O'Connor wrote, "that are most likely to inspire fear of bodily harm." As a caveat, the justices noted, such acts can be prosecuted if the intent is proven, something not done in this case.

markwilson wrote:
National Socialist Party v. Skokie (1977)

When the National Socialist Party of America, better known as Nazis

But the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower ruling that the Skokie ban was unconstitutional

The "National Socialist Party of America" does not mean NAZI; this is pure propaganda to convert Hitlerism to NAZIism.

The NAZI party was formed by combining two groups, the "Zionist - National Socialists Workers Party" with the Frankist Zionists, which became the NAtional ZIonists.

Anyone claiming to be NAZI would be a ZIONIST JEW.

The term NAZI Germany is a lie.

What the NAZI's did was to incorporate the Swastika on their paraphernalia as propaganda against the German people, this guise would distance themselves from their involvement with running the Emigration Camps under the Haavara or Transfer agreement, an agreement between the Zionists and Germany, signed on 25 August 1933.  After the WAR, the Zionist through control of the media and movie industry morphed the Emigration Camps into Death Camps, which became an atrocity where War appropriations were awarded to Zionists who claimed to be victims that survived these camps and their fictional gas chambers.

Ticked off to no end now, and no longer even imagining the fascist thugs are going to restore my channel, I fire my final volley (i.e., time to move on):

Vimeo,

Regarding your spurious statement that you do not "allow videos that harass, incite hatred, or include discriminatory or defamatory speech."

If you boys and girls are going to busy yourselves being the Orwellian era Thought Police, at least have the decency to cite exactly what content gets your panties all in a knot. We all know you can't do that, which proves all who do the things you now do, are rudderless ships tracking along whichever direction the wind dictates. That is to say, you, who have now taken upon yourselves the mantle of judge and jury of speech, lack a moral compass.

1) You allege "harass." Define specifically the content in which you falsely claim I did so.

2) You allege "incite hatred." Define specifically the content in which you falsely claim I did so.

3) You allege "discriminatory or defamatory speech." Define specifically the content in which you falsely claim I did so.

Since we have clearly proved your actions anti-American, anti-free speech, specious, and immoral, let us conclude the matter with;

Justify your actions. And if you can't do that, Restore my channel.

Mark Wilson

I'd like to add that VIMEO did delete a 2nd account I established immediately after the take-down using another email address.

I made only TWO posts with it; one under a video to Toxic Twin Steere, one under a video to Toxic Twin Sargent.

The offending video that no doubt really has a burr under their saddles all these months later (the Croatia Girl episode #49 is still scrubbed from her channel): www.dailymotion.com/video/x6s2di6

It exposes the perfidy of their own words and actions! And they obviously don't like it being held out there for periodic review, having been able to get the guy's YouTube channel deleted who originally caught them in their lies, and also now having apparently been able to shut down my TWO Vimeo channels containing it.

That 2nd Vimeo account was immediately deleted, and within MINUTES, giving pretty good proof, I believe, that the Twins have the number to Vimeo's censor-the-bejesus-out-of-those-whose-speech-we-don't-cotton-to hotline in their command center.

I've now moved the videos the Toxic Twins take umbrage to over to DailyMotion. So far the Twins have not been able to squash my free speech there. Yet. (note: when the above link stops working you will know they have been able to squash free speech at DailyMotion also)

Thanks for these updates Mark. Your wording of the letters you sent is excellent, firm and to the point. It's very interesting how this is playing out. Peace

Just 7 months after banning my original channel of 7 years and 28 million views, YouTube hit me with 2 fraudulent community strikes disabling my ability to upload. I managed to appeal one of them, but having grown tired of YouTube's constant censorship, I have started channels on DTube, BitTube, BitChute, and Real.Video. I have also created a new back-up YouTube channel @ https://www.youtube.com/c/FlatEarthEric in case this one is disabled or deleted again. Please follow the links in the description box to subscribe to my new channels and other social media accounts so you can stay connected with me in the event of future censorship. Thank you!

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/c/flateartheric
DTube Channel: https://d.tube/#!/c/ericdubay
BitTube Channel: https://bit.tube/Eric%20Dubay
BitChute Channel: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/ericdubay/
Real.Video Channel: https://www.real.video/channel/ericdubay

Minds: https://www.minds.com/EricDubay
Steemit: https://steemit.com/@ericdubay
Gab: https://gab.ai/Eric-Dubay
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ericdubay
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/ericdubaz/
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/ericdubay/
Google+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/114446283043110571468

http://www.EricDubay.com
http://www.AtlanteanConspiracy.com
http://www.IFERS.INFO

Just saw the new vid, Eric! Super stoked there are a variety of other decentralized video uploading websites out there. All of them are now bookmarked to both keep up with you and for future personal use. What a "world" we live in...keep up the fantastic work, brother!

JewTube has now disabled IFERS member "Mary at Sea Level" who will now be found at Marsy at Sea Level:  https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMrzekrVp3zCuSlwMqiGybQ

Hey guys, well Mary at sea level was banned yup, and now my other account Marsy at sea level was terminated this morning because of one single video. They also informed me im not allowed to have another youtube account
So back to steemit and Dtube later I guess

Having been the target of constant overt and covert censorship by YouTube for years, the following is my experience and analysis of how YouTube is actively suppressing and banning legitimate flat Earth content, while allowing and promoting illegitimate disinformation and controlled opposition agents.

1. Prioritizing "Debunking" and Controlled Opposition Videos

Since its inception, Google has always prioritized the farcical, satirical "Flat Earth Society," when users search the topic "Flat Earth" in their search engine. By doing so, people are introduced to disingenuous disinformation as the primary source of information on the subject and thus influenced into believing the entire topic to be unscientific and just some convoluted troll. Before 2015 when the Flat Earth keyword began its explosive exponential growth, many of my Flat Earth videos went viral, appearing in recommended feeds and given top priority in all relevant searches, garnering millions of views and tens of thousands of subscribers in a very short space of time. Since approximately 2016 and onward however, YouTube has completely changed their algorithm so that a search for "Flat Earth" and related topics gives results that show only "Flat Earth Debunking" videos for the first several pages! No videos by any legitimate flat Earther appear in the search nor do they make it to recommended feeds. If any user scrolls down through the wall of sophist debunking videos they will then be met with a second wall of disingenuous government Metatron corporate infiltrators, and not a single legitimate scientific Flat Earth video.

2. Removing Likes

In order to influence public opinion and the recommended feed algorithm which involves a video's like ratio, YouTube has also engaged in a campaign against myself and other genuine flat Earth content creators by egregiously removing all likes and the ability to like our videos! Not only will thousands of likes disappear and reset to 0 overnight, but users previous likes will remain in the "like" position without being counted, while users trying to add new likes are disabled. Meanwhile, however, all dislikes and the ability to dislike remain untouched, making it appear that the public consensus of each video is abysmal and making it impossible to appear in YouTube's recommended feed. Several times and now as if on cue, when a new video on my channel gathers an above average number of views/likes, within 48 hours someone with direct access to YouTube's own software and administrative privileges, wipes all the likes and the ability to like the new video. Every time they have done this, they also wipe the likes from my most recent 10-15 videos for good measure, as if trying to punish me or send some silent message. I assume they could just remove every single like from every video on my account if they wanted, but for whatever reason, they just do it periodically to groups of new videos like this.

3. Removing Subscriptions

An even more sinister and effective covert form of censorship YouTube has been engaging in with mine and other legitimate flat Earth channels is removing subscriptions. Over the years I have received thousands of comments from users complaining of being unsubscribed from my channel not once but repeatedly. Many long-time subscribers have complained of being mysteriously unsubscribed from my channel upwards of 5-10 times periodically over the course of several years. Through no action of their own, after noticing a lack of my content appearing in their feeds, users continue commenting that my channel has disappeared from their subscription list. As with removing likes, removing subscriptions makes it incredibly difficult to build a channel, unlikely to appear high in searches, and influences public opinion about the authority and popularity of the content in question. This act of removing likes and subscribers from content creators implicates YouTube themselves in the organized, intentional, unlawful censorship of selected channels, in direct violation of the first amendment rights guaranteed in their country of operation.

4. Sniping and Porn-Bombing

Channels who attempt using YouTube's live hangout feature encounter another method of covert censorship, whereby people with access to YouTube's administrative dashboard are hacking into live video streams and shutting them down, taking them over and streaming their own anti-flat-Earth content, or playing hard-core pornography on the stream resulting in the channel owner having their account irrevocably striked (and I stipulate irrevocably, because all appeals are denied without reason or explanation). Legitimate, independent, scientific channels like "Beyond the Imaginary Curve" are constantly sniped and porn-bombed during their live hangouts, while illegitimate, unscientific, Metatron corporate infiltrators like a certain cold potato channel that shall remain nameless are never affected, nor do they ever have their likes and subscriptions removed. Quite to the contrary, they are prioritized over all other better, genuine content.

5. Community Strikes and Banishment

When all else fails, YouTube simply bans your channel, as myself and several other flat Earthers such as ODD TV, IHateMainStream, Mary at Sea Level, TheSeattleGreen, LukeDoughNelly, Jay Decasby, and many others have experienced. On December 12, 2017, in a particularly outrageous case, in violation of their own community guidelines, YouTube removed my original channel of 7+ years, 135,000 subscribers and 28 million views for a single "hate-speech" strike. Firstly there was no hateful speech anywhere in the factual, historical documentary they striked, but secondly and more importantly, they deleted my entire channel of over 200 videos, for a single strike, when their own legal terms and conditions, along with every user's channel dashboard states, that channels are allowed 3 strikes before being banned. Just as with the sniping and porn-bombing attacks, strike and banishment appeals are denied and met with silence no matter how you try to contact YouTube for answers.

YouTube has long been engaging in this blatant censorship of flat Earth and many other important topics and it is high time this becomes publicized so they are held accountable for their unlawful actions. Please help share this video across your social media platforms to spread the word about YouTube's under-handed suppression of selected users and subjects. Also be sure to follow on BitTube, DTube, BitChute, Real.Video and other independent video sharing sites where your likes, subscriptions and channels won't be so callously censored. Since we cannot rely on YouTube's algorithms, searches, or recommended videos, it is up to us and of paramount importance that we manually share this information by word of mouth and grassroots activism, so I implore everyone take it upon yourselves and make it your life's mission as myself and many other have to expose these lies/liars and fight for the truth so ourselves and future generations can live in a world where basic liberties like free speech are prized and protected.

https://bit.tube/Eric%20Dubay
https://d.tube/#!/c/ericdubay
https://www.bitchute.com/channel/TCgwKoAf3Y9z/
https://www.real.video/channel/ericdubay

There have been court rulings that "public" online spaces like Twitter (or YouTube) are analogous to literal public squares and should be held accoutnable to public laws regardless of private ownership or not.

Admin wrote:
court rulings
"public" online spaces like Twitter (or YouTube)
are analogous to public squares

"Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which it ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk, even though the sidewalk was part of a privately owned company town."

Marsh v. Alabama (No. 114)

Argued: December 6, 1945
Decided: January 7, 1946
21 So.2d 558, reversed.

   Syllabus
   Opinion, Black
   Concurrence, Frankfurter
   Dissent, Reed

Syllabus

1. A state can not, consistently with the freedom of religion and the press guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments, impose criminal punishment on a person for distributing religious literature on the sidewalk of a company-owned town contrary to regulations of the town's management, where the town and its shopping district are freely accessible to and freely used by the public in general, even though the punishment is attempted under a state statute making it a crime for anyone to enter or remain on the premises of another after having been warned not to do so. Pp. 502, 505. [p502]

2. Whether a corporation or a municipality owns or possesses a town, the public in either case has an identical interest in the functioning of the community in such manner that the channels of communication remain free. P. 507.

3. People living in company-owned towns are free citizens of their State and country, just as residents of municipalities, and there is no more reason for depriving them of the liberties guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments than there is for curtailing these freedoms with respect to any other citizen. P. 508.

APPEAL from the affirmance of a conviction for violation of a state statute challenged as invalid under the Federal Constitution. The State Supreme Court denied certiorari, 246 Ala. 539, 21 So.2d 564.

Admin wrote:
court rulings
"public" online spaces like Twitter (or YouTube)
are analogous to public squares

Twitter has long established a track record of censorship.

It should be obvious that this monopoly by the Zionist controlled media (sites like Twitter, Wikipedia, etc) are crying wolf, when they proclaim that their site is "a public square".  The goal here is to allow the Zionist media to self-regulate for "fake news".

Google gives 650,000,000 results for "Flat Earth" but you can only access 172 of them

Admin wrote:
Google gives 650,000,000 results for "Flat Earth"
you can only access 172 of them

As shown, the Zionist Jews (Vatican/Jesuits/Freemasons/other) don't want you to know the truth, this is why they own and control the News Media, Electronic Town Squares (social media) and Entertainment Industry.

You defend one of these fictional stories:

• Theoretical Science - Space (Big Bang), ATOM, remove Electron create Explosion
  
• Creation Science - Heaven (Holy Spirit), ADAM, remove Rib create Women
  

You defend one of these fictional stories:

• Atheist - The Jesuits, invented Big Bang, Space, and you an Ape like creature who must consume the flesh and blood.
  
• Theist - The Jesuits, instruct you to obey God in Heaven for HE has given you every Clean and Unclean animal for food.
  

I've just had my Nuke video blocked worldwide by YouTube, then given a hate-speech strike for my Imagine That song yesterday, and just now today I've received a "harassment and bullying" strike (for God knows what reason) on my old Sage of Quay interview from 3 years ago.  Looks like this YouTube end of the year removal of my channel is about to become an annual thing.

(Update: My Sage of Quay appeal went through, but Imagine That remains striked)

I've just received my 3rd strike in 3 days and I can barely keep up with the appeals trying to keep my channel alive. Everyone please subscribe to my back-up YouTube channel as I have a feeling my current one is about to die: https://www.youtube.com/c/flateartheric

The censorship continues this morning with 3 more videos being blocked or age-restricted: The video of Del verbally destroying Joe Rogan, the Spanish version of 200 Proofs (I have no idea how/why they determined that needed age-restriction) and my We Are Not Slaves song with Seth Davis.