NASA Fail Compilation

Posted by csp on 08/24/2015

First fly by of Pluto, LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://i.imgur.com/t14H63k.mp4

EDIT: OK, now apparently it is CGI... but looks almost exactly the same as the original Pluto images.

EDIT2: I'll leave this here, so we can compare the "real" first fly by with this "CGI" one, I'll hazard to guess it's not much different.

Posted by gnosticwarrior on 08/24/2015

They might as well use styrofoam craft balls, painted up against a black sheet at this point, lmao.

I almost snorted my coffee on this one.

Posted by Observicus on 08/29/2015

Posted by eclipse91 on 09/06/2015

If I could find the link, I remember hearing some interview about how far above the Earth would need to go to get an accurate picture of entire hemisphere. 

Mathematically speaking, about 95% is not visible from the height of the International Space Station. 
...wonder how they got those pictures hahaha.

Posted by csp on 09/10/2015

This news story on Aussie news site today:

www.news.com.au/lifestyle/real-life/giant-space-sperm-spotted-in-the-skies-of-florida/story-fnq2oad4-1227521133511

And while many theories are sure to emerge, including the possibility of alien life, the object is most likely from the Atlas V rocket launched from Cape Canaveral in Florida on the same day, and at the same time, as this video.

Think someone dun messed up.

Posted by csp on 09/18/2015
The mountains on Pluto, LOL!

Posted by jpwagnerbenningtonks on 09/26/2015

The Apollo astronauts (who were freemasons) put retroreflectors on the moon so that we could shoot laser pulses to the moon and reflect them back to prove we truly went to the moon.



The scientists that do these experiments claim that they can only get a very tiny fraction of light back because the light has to travel over 477,000 miles. But how fast do we have to be moving around the universe for people to realize that this ridiculous experiment just does not work? We are spinning on an axis, while the moon orbits around us, while we are orbiting around the sun, while the sun is orbiting around the milky way galaxy, while the milky way galaxy is hurtling through space?

Posted by regencybrougham on 10/10/2015

news.yahoo.com/horizons-space-probe-finds-brilliant-blue-skies-water-220504724--abc-news-topstories.html

NASA claims probe sees bright blue skies and water ice on Pluto accompanied by one of their typical CGI images that shows nothing of the sort. Just a black disc with a blue halo around it.

Comments on the article are typical- Amazing! We're so insignificant! Etc.

Posted by thinkforyourself on 10/10/2015

Oct 9, 2015 16:28:39 GMT regencybrougham said:
news.yahoo.com/horizons-space-probe-finds-brilliant-blue-skies-water-220504724--abc-news-topstories.html

NASA claims probe sees bright blue skies and water ice on Pluto accompanied by one of their typical CGI images that shows nothing of the sort. Just a black disc with a blue halo around it.

Comments on the article are typical- Amazing! We're so insignificant! Etc.

Yet more revolting fairytales spewing from the evil anus of NaSATAN. How anyone can see that 'photo' and believe that it proves that Pluto has water on it is beyond me.

'First flower grown in space shows there is 'other life' out there'
US astronaut Scott Kelly announced the historic news from the International Space Station

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/first-flower-born-in-space-shows-there-is-other-life-out-there-a6818381.html



US astronaut Scott Kelly announced the historic news that a zinnia plant had flowered on the International Space Station (ISS) on his Twitter account, along with a photograph of an orange, 13-petalled flower.

A Nasa blog about the flowers, written before one had bloomed, said zinnias were chosen not for their beauty but to “help scientists understand how plants flower and grow in microgravity”.

Other plants, such as lettuce and wheat, have been grown in space but never a flower that has bloomed.

“The zinnia plant is very different from lettuce,” Trent Smith, project manager of the ISS’s “Veggie” plant growth facility, told the Nasa blog.

“It is more sensitive to environmental parameters and light characteristics. It has a longer growth duration between 60 and 80 days.

“Thus, it is a more difficult plant to grow, and allowing it to flower, along with the longer growth duration, makes it a good precursor to a tomato plant.”

In addition to helping scientists work out how to grow useful plants in space, it is thought the presence of a flower will raise spirits among the ISS crew.

“Plants can indeed enhance long-duration missions in isolated, confined and extreme environments – environments that are artificial and deprived of nature,” Alexandra Whitmire, of the NASA Human Research Programme, said.

“While not all crew members may enjoy taking care of plants, for many, having this option is beneficial.

“In future missions, the importance of plants will likely increase given the crews’ limited connection to Earth. Studies from other isolated and confined environments, such as Antarctic stations, demonstrate the importance of plants in confinement, and how much more salient fresh food becomes psychologically, when there is little stimuli around.”

NASA just saw something come out of a black hole for the first time ever



You don’t have to know a whole lot about science to know that black holes typically suck things in, not spew things out. But NASA just spotted something mighty strange at the supermassive black hole Markarian 335.

Two of NASA’s space telescopes, including the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR), miraculously observed a black hole’s corona “launched” away from the supermassive black hole. Then a massive pulse of X-ray energy spewed out. So, what exactly happened? That’s what scientists are trying to figure out now.

“This is the first time we have been able to link the launching of the corona to a flare,” Dan Wilkins, of Saint Mary’s University, said. “This will help us understand how supermassive black holes power some of the brightest objects in the universe.”

NuSTAR’s principal investigator, Fiona Harrison, noted that the nature of the energetic source is “mysterious,” but added that the ability to actually record the event should provide some clues about the black hole's size and structure, along with (hopefully) some fresh intel on how black holes function. Luckily for us, this black hole is still 324 million light-years away.

So, no matter what strange things it’s doing, it shouldn’t have any effect on our corner of the universe.

Former NASA astronaut Mark Kelly, right, looks at his brother Scott before a news conference Friday, March 4, 2016, in Houston.

The genetic doubles — one in space, one on the ground — took part in medical studies throughout the flight. NASA wants to know how the body and mind adjust to long periods in space before sending astronauts to Mars; expeditions are planned for the 2030s.

I never even knew he had a twin (did anyone else know this?) - I guess Scott can walk around on earth masquerading as Mark while he is supposedly on the ISS - a (almost) perfect cover.

Flat Earth - ESA Hoax Part 10: Peakey boy, Sneaky boy, returning home in a CGI leaky toy

A "photo" of Jewpiter’s "Northern Lights"/Kipa taken by NASA’s Juno mission last week:









http://gizmodo.com/jupiters-northern-lights-look-absolutely-incredible-1782881771

I took their recent image they say was taken June 30, 2016 and put it on top of the EXACT same image they released back in May 2014. They are the same picture, however they played with the saturation and contrast to make it appear different and sprinkled some aurora pixel dust on top. I recreated the process even though my aurora dust isn't quite as snazzy as theirs. Either way, just more fakery from our hard spent tax dollars.

NASA Fact-Checks Star Trek's Starship Enterprise

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/emdrive-nasa-eagleworks-paper-has-finally-passed-peer-review-says-scientist-know-1578716

Thought I would drop this link here, a bunch of NASA propaganda talking about their new "fake propulsion" drives (EmDrive).

For those unfamiliar with it, the propellantless propulsion system EmDrive was first designed by aerospace engineer Roger Shawyer back in 2001 — offering a way to make aircraft lighter, faster, and (possibly) cheaper since they won’t have to carry fuel. The reason for skepticism in some quarters has come because it appears to defy Newton’s conservation of momentum law, stating that an object won’t move unless some outside force is applied.

That skepticism has made even respected publications like New Scientist question how much space they should be dedicating to a concept which seems to defy much of what we know about the way the physical world works.

So now they don't need fake fuel to explore fake space, they can just use a fake EmDrive.

LOL. The two names mentioned in that article (Paul March and Jose Rodal) both have a numerology value of 33.

I keep my eye out for these science fiction stories, there's at least one or two every day. It's such a shame that 99.9% of the population can't tell the difference between science fiction and science fact.

Here's one from a few days ago: NASA detects most distant galaxy cluster ever seen: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3766058/A-baby-picture-11-1-billion-light-years-Earth-Nasa-spots-distant-galaxy-cluster-seen.html

Notice the designation of the galaxy cluster 1001+0220 (i.e. 11+22=33).

Or how about this one today about 'alien cliques' and the Fermi Paradox: https://www.rt.com/news/358052-alien-cliques-isolate-earth/

Fermi also just so happens to be 33 in numerology. (RT seems to be down for me at the moment)

I can just picture the people writing these articles peeing themselves laughing reading the comments.

csp wrote:http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/emdrive-nasa-eagleworks-paper-has-finally-passed-peer-review-says-scientist-know-1578716

Thought I would drop this link here, a bunch of NASA propaganda talking about their new "fake propulsion" drives (EmDrive).

For those unfamiliar with it, the propellantless propulsion system EmDrive was first designed by aerospace engineer Roger Shawyer back in 2001 — offering a way to make aircraft lighter, faster, and (possibly) cheaper since they won’t have to carry fuel. The reason for skepticism in some quarters has come because it appears to defy Newton’s conservation of momentum law, stating that an object won’t move unless some outside force is applied.

That skepticism has made even respected publications like New Scientist question how much space they should be dedicating to a concept which seems to defy much of what we know about the way the physical world works.

So now they don't need fake fuel to explore fake space, they can just use a fake EmDrive.

Today NASA are showing the first ever fake close up pictures of Jupiters north pole (warning large image):
https://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/pia21031_3_figa_npoleterminatorview2_figa.png


Here is the image with the levels adjusted in photoshop revealing the layers and smearing used to create the non-uniform shadow across the left side, obvious CGI with photoshop on top:

interesting fail that reveals the trickery used by NASA to forge the desired reflection in the astronut's visor for the apollo 17 hoax.
original HD pic is still downloadable from their official website at (see attached pic)
It is my first post here and I will take that opportunity to thank Eric Dubay and the IFERS community for their amazing work, guys you rock!



update:

the same "man in a fireproof suit" can be seen in at least another official NASA shot. The visor reflection exposed in AS17-134-20385 is particularly interesting because it allows to get another glimpse of the stage at a different moment in time, precisely 6 seconds before the one exposed in AS17-134-20387 (presented above).

According to NASA,
AS17-134-20385 was shot at 118:26:32
( pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-134-20385HR.jpg )



and AS17-134-20387 at 118:26:38. So both photographs are indeed spaced by just 6 seconds.
( pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-134-20387HR.jpg )



Having a different glimpse of the stage from essentially the same angle but at a different moment in time allows us to identify what items were moved if any and see if anything contradicts the official narrative.



The red line in the pic above is connecting the two (very bright) light sources that should be the Sun except it is clearly not at the same spot in both frames.
in AS17-134-20385, it is about located at the right shoulder of the fireproof man while it can be seen much lower, at about the location of the right elbow 6 seconds later!
The blue line highlights the locations of what should officially be some aluminum-made junk (probably the lander itself) except the locations have changed quite a bit in the 6 seconds interval!
Finally the orange arrows were added to show that the fireproof gauntlet holding the smoking item is almost transparent in AS17-134-20385 although we are still able to see part of the original gauntlet and a black area belonging to the burning item. That burning item producing smoke was likely held by the astroactor to make the visor reflection more blurry but failed to provide the desired smog-of-war effect, fortunately.  
Also the fireproof man in AS17-134-20385 is bent over the stage and in the other pic he seems to be holding the astroactor toy still with a pole.

Here is another apollo 17 fail
While looking closely at this pic, you might notice something very odd, out of place, just above Gene's right ankle. Zooming in helps establish that the strange piece is actually a book; Already very odd by itself and even more when realizing the book is floating above the "lunar" ground at an impossible angle.
Further inspection (horizontal mirroring and sharpening) of the book reveals the three letters G A Y written on the front cover. Could that relate to sex magic stuff, similar to the many sexual references found in the Disney products and other NASA fakes?
or may be a prank made by the team in charge of forging the composites?
In any case, another solid fail  

( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a17/AS17-141-21608HR.jpg )




Update:
This very same photograph shows at least two other remarkable anomalies.

1/ The first one being the reflection of the photographer (Jack) visible in Gene's visor as shown magnified many times in the pic below.




A close inspection reveals that not only Jack is not wearing a complete A7LB EVA suit (with the typical huge backpack missing) but he isn't even carrying his camera. Not only that but the astroactor is also not facing the scene being shot, rather showing an angle more or less 45deg with Gene. That seems pretty odd and even very dangerous combination of events for any photographer working on the lunar surface




2/ The other remarkable anomaly can be seen on Gene's right gauntlet in the area over his index. In this region, the gauntlet seems to be melting with the body behind but even stranger, there seems to be something written in there. I can recognize a letter 'A' but the meaning of the whole remains a mystery for me. If anyone has a suggestion, please enlighten me.

Here you will find a couple of fails from the apollo 11 mission, all from the magazine #44 and relating to the moment right after the lunar module had separated from the command module and was beginning its glorious descent ( ) . Following the official narrative, all photographs presented here were made by the astroactor left behind in lunar orbit, through the small window of the command module.
The real story is obviously quite different and a mere adjustment of the brightness and contrast levels reveals that almost all of the photographs have been retouched digitally. Notice the clean and straight outlines around the lunar lander in most every pic, evidence that a technician working for NASA filled the background with material from a different pic to conceal unwanted details while preserving the original lunar lander in place. Either that way or the other (i.e: cut-outs of lander were added to the original shots with an image editing software). Whatever case it is, what we have here is a pretty nice bunch of fails.
Note: You will find a few of them in the list below (I will try to add more overtime) but the whole series taken from the magazine #44 and featuring the lander leaving the command module, shows the same sign of fraud. There are in total more than a dozen of these composites available online in high definition on NASA's website.

( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6576HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6577HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6578HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6579HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6580HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6581HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6582HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6583HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6584HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6585HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6586HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6587HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6588HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6589HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6590HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6591HR.jpg )


( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6592HR.jpg )



update:

At this point, you may be wondering about the kind of details they tried to hide from us using that simple Photoshop trick?
If such is your case, you're lucky because we can actually find an answer to that question; A few lines above I wrote that all of the photographs had been retouched digitally, this is actually inexact as at least two in the batch show no sign of editing, namely AS11-44-6574HR.jpg and AS11-44-6575HR.jpg.
Increasing the brightness and contrast levels of AS11-44-6574HR.jpg reveals a very weird feature through the deep of space.



The first thing we notice is the lack of any trace of editing around the lander which contrasts with the rest of the batch. The next thing of importance is that odd object appearing in the top left corner and marked with the blue arrows. Could it be a mere reflection from the interior of the command module on the window glass? Once flipped vertically, the picture become much clearer.

( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6574HR.jpg )


That strange object now resembles a left hand holding something that could be a detachable helmet visor or a frame through which they are taking the shots, the command module window frame visible in almost all the shots! In that scenario the left hand would belong to a second photographer standing next to the author of our pic.
Also remarkable is how the picture flipped that way makes the contact probes of the lander hanging in the same direction than anything hanging on the surface of Earth    Flipping the picture was to create a feel of weightlessness, I guess.  

The second photograph also shows the object albeit more blurry, unfortunately, but still recognizable though.

( Original pic available @ https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-44-6575HR.jpg )

Great job with these Blob, thanks for picking apart more fraudulent NASA images!