Page 7 of 7
This is actually strong evidence, is this repeated multiple times?
- Posts : 19
Points : 2138
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2018-02-26
From the Gibson225 channel: Camera distance to first windmill : 3.5 kilometers . Distance camera to last windmill : 10.5 kilometers . Camera at 0.5 meters above the water line that means the horizon is at 2.5 kilometers . The first windmill is at 3.5 kilometers , so the horizon as being the alleged curvature of earth starts 1 kilometer before the first windmill . The last windmill is 7 kilometers apart from the first one , that makes a total of 8 ( 7 plus 1) kilometers of curvature we should take into account . 8 kilometers of distance equals 5 meters of curvature . Nice coincident is that the whole yellow bottom part measures exactly 5 meters so none of the yellow part of the last 2 windmills should have remained visible here but should instead have been blocked by the 5 meters of curved water entirely . You notice , however , that the yellow parts are more and more obscured but still you can see they are there. The cause of this optical phenomenon should therefore be sought for in others causes , such as the limitations of the human eye and the atmospheric conditions .
susie, CajunPie, notdownunder and tycho_brahe like this post
susie wrote:Reading his breakdown of the video he “reconstructed” it. What’s that all about?Gemini wrote:they say this video is 48km up in sky! what do you think? this is after fish eye corrected.
I think some will go to any length to support their balls.
The video is still distorted. When the balloon pops, the earth becomes concave and convex, depending on the camera orientation. I think Founded Earth Brothers demonstrated that only a straight line can appear to be both convex and concave with a fisheye lens.
So the video is more proof of flat earth.
- Posts : 9
Points : 670
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2022-02-20
daride likes this post
Page 7 of 7
Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum