Flat Earth Image Proofs

Many thanks to all Admins who managed to reload all photos & threads on this new site...highest respect from me...

Cheers,
Jimmy

jimmytamp wrote:Many thanks to all Admins who managed to reload all photos & threads on this new site...highest respect from me...

Cheers,
Jimmy

Thank you so much, we all really appreciate your support.

New Orleans from Mandeville on Northshore 25 miles minimum.  Beachfront to skyline.

Down the Mississippi Gulfcoast toward Biloxi

franks3 wrote:My best friends took a trip down there and even they said they had about 17 hours of daylight in March. Can anyone please answer this for me. I don't know if I can even find my way back to this forum or where your answer might appear. Please email me at frankariii@hushmail.com with an answer if you can. I am almost ready to give up on Flat Earth if I cannot get an answer to this.

Just took a trip "down there"? What for? Who do they work for?
Where is the evidence of a 17hr daylight? Because so far all the evidence I have seen, has been bunk fake CGI sun footage.

csp wrote:

franks3 wrote:My best friends took a trip down there and even they said they had about 17 hours of daylight in March. Can anyone please answer this for me. I don't know if I can even find my way back to this forum or where your answer might appear. Please email me at frankariii@hushmail.com with an answer if you can. I am almost ready to give up on Flat Earth if I cannot get an answer to this.

Just took a trip "down there"? What for? Who do they work for?
Where is the evidence of a 17hr daylight? Because so far all the evidence I have seen, has been bunk fake CGI sun footage.

Same sentiment as csp, all timelapse photography in southern latitude looks completely CGI, the human eye is actually incredibly hard to fool, especially after you've had fakery pointed out. The old fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me adage. Here is a great example of questionable southern footage: https://vimeo.com/40348544 Things to look for: Notice how all of the daytime shots look live and the camera is always panning during the timelapse. Then notice how in every single nighttime timelapse the camera is fixed. Why? Because it would be incredibly hard to animate all the fake rotating stars AND have them pan with the camera on 2 planes. Also notice how the stars themselves never change magnitude whatsoever, never twinkle, never change color, etc. It LOOKS like an image of the milky way that someone is just rotating because most likely that's all it is. Compare that footage to a timelapse of the north star.


I was born in Missouri, the Show Me state, and I live by that philosophy. Talk is cheap, show me the video, show me the timelapse, show me the 17 hours. Every time they do there are dozens of anomalies we don't see in comparable footage of the northern sky. Be more ready to give up on your lying "friends" not your own eyes. Also, in March near the spring Equinox the ENTIRE Earth should be 12 hours of daylight according to the heliocentric model so...not quite sure how even 14 or 15 or 16 or 17 hours of daylight would even be remotely possible anywhere in the world.

@07:43 sun moving "up and down" and always in view from a ground perspective as viewed from the north pole can only be consistent with a Flat Earth perspective




you have two points of reference the sun and the reflection of the sun in the water = if the man is turning around the north pole the reflection of the sun cannot be under the sun all the time = very simple. the man is upright and the sun is turning around him

NASA GETS KILLED TECHNICALLY. UNEQUIVOCAL PROOF OF FLAT EARTH

The Flat Earth : Eyre Highway (1,030 Plain Miles)

Here are photos showing every mile along the 11+ mile international raceway in the Bonneville salt flats in Utah.

Took these pictures today from the Liverpool waterfront, England. It's looking west over the river Mersey, and was around 3:40pm - 3:45pm. The river is at most a km across at this point, I walked north up the waterfront while taking pics to show how the suns rays would keep reflecting directly to me off the flat water.

Both of these photos were taken from around southern Vancouver Island. I based the measurements off of the 'earth curve calculator' easily found on google, using the 8 inch per mile squared calculation.

Airplane view on globe earth model:



Airplane view in reality:

Very wide angle views from the Shard in London, not a sniff of any curvature

Hi guys, I wanted to bring back some of the spanish pics I put on the former forum , I´m now trying to get them together and I´ll post ´em as I go along, Mallorca from Barcelona:



to see the lowest peak(Puig Roig) from that distance it´s impossible on a sphere

No curve. Beaver Island MI.
Islands on horizon are 33
miles away and should be beyond the imaginary curve

ThirdEyeOpen wrote:
No curve
Beaver Island MI
[seen] 33 miles away

Interesting photo, beautiful location.

Let's dissect what's shown in the photo.

Lake Michigan–Huron
577 feet (176 m) above Sea Level

Beaver Island
732 feet (223m) above mean sea level.

732 - 577 = making Beaver Island 155 feet (47m) above Lake Michigan

As shown, the distance of 33 miles across the Earth's Curvature, would put Beaver Island, 416 feet (127m) below the Observer.