Flat Earth Maps

I am releasing my Hammond's Map project final version.
all the details regarding this project is also available in Pdf link as follows; https://drive.google.com/open?id=1IeAqu1k9Vu3o4HVXorqS6y37klB-S1eL

Good job Hafiz.

Thinkforyourself wrote:Posted by susie on 06/02/2015

Like I said before, the masonic manipulators have their headquarters emblazoned with the Asimuthal EquidIstant Projection. That in itself is evidence enough for me to know that it is the real McCoy.

The Asimuthal is the exact distances to all points from the North Pole. That means as it is in reality.

Instead of those blokes trying to prove the flat earth map wrong, let them measure Australia physically by themselves to prove that it is not identical to the flat earth map.

If all points on a map are exact measurements from the North Pole common sense says it is exact.

I agree 110%. The fact that it is right there, smack in our faces (mocking us gullible sheeple!), on the UN logo/flag should be enough of an indicator that this is the truth. They wouldn't put it there for any other logical reason.

I only have one critique (but it's my understanding that the website had lost most or all its material at some point and had to re-upload it all?) and that is that the pictures of the maps on the first page are all very small and hard to really look at and review and there isn't a bigger version we can click on or able to enlarge in any way, shape or form. But I'm still grateful that they're there at all!

Thanks so much for this wonderful resource. This forum is a Godsend.

-Chris

Please can someone explain why the land masses on FE maps appear squashed compared to the land masses on the maps we have all been indoctrinated with? I read somewhere that it is something to do with the coordinates being taken from a flat or Mercator map???

And, yes, I do agree with the above comments wondering how we can be sure that any existing map is even close to accurate. I'm afraid contributing to any research or plotting is far beyond me.

That is easy enough.  Such as the Gall-Peters Projection showing that Alaska and Greenland are approximately 1/5 of the actual size that we had always learned and believed without protest.

The Entire purpose of this website is to remind us all that the world is not what they told us -- we are Not an insignificant speck of nothing in the universe -- We Are the Universe.

Flat Earth maps appear squashed because it is an entirely different orientation -- using the North Pole as the center origin, everything else is a projection of what they think it is contrasted against what we know it is -- a vast, flat continuous plane of existence.

Niar_Azeroth wrote:Good job Hafiz.

thanks and peace on you brother

Sent from Topic'it App

Any larger versions?

Last year in march 9 i noticed they had inverted the AE projection on https://earth.nullschool.net/
By inverted i mean the south pole was in the middle of the map and north pole was projected on the outer rim of the map.

Since then i have not used that website at all, today i had a look to see if they fixed it, they have not fixed it, they completely removed it.

Anyone who knows if there is a similiar site with a AE projection with weather and temperatures etc. ?
Also if you have any info about why they removed it i would like to know the reason.

Does anyone have any theories as to why the large island masses of New Zealand are being left out of many modern world maps?
Could it be anything to do with New Zealand's relative proximity to the Antartic ice wall?
There is a massive Reddit forum about this with 30000 subscribers:
https://www.reddit.com/r/MapsWithoutNZ/

Attached is an example from an Ikea poster.

My thoughts on Flat Earth maps. Why do all Flat Earth maps have the North Pole in the center if the Earth is a Ball? I would think at least some of them would have the South Pole as the center if the Earth were a ball.

Jacois wrote:My thoughts on Flat Earth maps.  Why do all Flat Earth maps have the North Pole in the center if the Earth is a Ball?  I would think at least some of them would have the South Pole  as the center if the Earth were a ball.

Probably because at the time they were made including up to this point in time the vast majority of the world's population lived in the northern hemisphere

Hi,
I saw that google had a doodle from the flemish cartographer Abraham Ortelius today. Apparently this guy was a person from Antwerp. I have to say I did not hear a lot about him in school classes, and I'm from that city... Now his map is called the "Theatrum Orbis Terrarum" (Theatre of the World) which I do find a good description. and it even translates into "the globe theatre"
So his "buddy" mercator draws the North Pole as a mountain and 4 rivers, but on his map only the land divided by the rivers show up, leaving water on top...? also the way the South Pole is depicted here on Ortelius's map... That is quite a lot of area for only being something small at the bottom...
These early representations take on the desired form (in direction of the globe) more and more but they seem to have some last remnants of what seem to be a honest representation.
I find it funny that these 2 are flemish.. What's up with this place and cartographers
Also you see all the media outlets (here in Belgium at least) covering this honouring, making a short article refreshing the memory of its being. All keeping the image / story / lie vivid. A quick snack for those that roam those sites, no further questions needed...
Take care,
MMDC.

Someone on twitter just came up with a map that has co-ordinates plotted: https://flat-earth.blog/2018/06/25/coordinates-dont-lie/

i don't think so, although he tried hard which should be appreciated but still lacking a lot of real things which are reality. I have go through many comments on this video as well.
i would like to ask, what does our this forum think about it?

HafizAbdulWahhab wrote:

i would like to ask, what does our this forum think about it?

Do not waste your time watching a balltard promote a new flat Earth model.

Schpankme wrote:

HafizAbdulWahhab wrote:

i would like to ask, what does our this forum think about it?

Do not waste your time watching a balltard promote a new flat Earth model.

Agreed. A map projection is by definition, the mathematical projection of a space ball to a 2 dimensional surface (usually planar).
i.e. You assume a space ball in order to create a map projection. Duh.

vortexpuppy wrote:

Schpankme wrote:

HafizAbdulWahhab wrote:

i would like to ask, what does our this forum think about it?

Do not waste your time watching a balltard promote a new flat Earth model.

Agreed. A map projection is by definition, the mathematical projection of a space ball to a 2 dimensional surface (usually planar).
i.e. You assume a space ball in order to create a map projection. Duh.

already know it, just asking the fellow FE about their opinion.
Thanks and Peace on all of you Fellow FEs

Observing the map and photo attached, with the understanding that south is every direction opposite of the north pole, would it be possible to do a trajectory test where you begin with an initial west facing direction and if you were to keep a straight line trajectory, at what point would your compass needle spin itself to be pointing south?

Freepressfreepeople wrote:
south is every direction opposite of the north
at what point would your compass needle spin itself to be pointing south

Your compass needle would be pointing due South when your heading is 180' from North.

Thank you for the reply and video, schpankme. I had to watch it twice to try to make sure I understood correctly what he was saying. I will definitely check out more videos on his channel. I'm still having a hard time understanding what his point was. He says there is a roughly 2.min difference in sunrise at 3 points on earth but why does this disprove the gleason map?

Freepressfreepeople wrote:
Thank you for the reply and video
I'm still having a hard time understanding what his point was

"I" mistakenly gave you the wrong video; Sorry about that, I'm sure all the ranting in that video was not what you were excepting.
Unfortunately, the account that produced the video related to "Directions on the flat Earth" has been deleted by NAtional ZIonist, Google/YouTube.

Freepressfreepeople wrote:Observing the map and photo attached, with the understanding that south is every direction opposite of the north pole, would it be possible to do a trajectory test where you begin with an initial west facing direction and if you were to keep a straight line trajectory, at what point would your compass needle spin itself to be pointing south?

Science Bob says: https://sciencebob.com/what-would-a-compass-point-to-is-you-were-at-the-north-pole/

"What would a compass point to if you were at the North Pole?

Believe it or not, there are actually TWO North Poles – the one at the top of the earth and what is known as MAGNETIC NORTH. Magnetic north is actually in northern Canada, and that is where compasses point to.

Now, on to your question…if you were standing exactly on top of the magnetic north pole, your compass would point nowhere in particular since the place it is used to pointing to is at your feet! You should know that finding magnetic north is not always easy – the spot is actually moving about 10 miles northwest every year. Since it was discovered in 1831, magnetic north has traveled many miles from its original spot!

NOW YOU KNOW!"

ZeusThunderer wrote:

Here's a High Resolution version of this map (4641 x 6554 pixels)
http://zeus-thunderer.deviantart.com/art/Gleason-s-Flat-Earth-Map-672880072

.

Could you please re-upload the High Resolution version of this map?
This is my favorite FE map, but the D/L location is gone. I would like to print it out.
All the other maps shown here are so smal that printing them on anything but a small piece of paper wouldn't make sense.

Thanks.