The Sun, Moon, and Stars Prove the Flat Earth

A CME can take between 18 Hrs and 138 Hrs to hit earth.
 
If the sun is only 3000 miles away in the flat earth model why is the CME arrival time so varied.
This has been bugging me.  Thanks.....

If we have no independently verifiable evidence that "CME's take between 18 - 138 hours to hit Earth," nor even have evidence that CME's exist whatsoever, there is nothing that should be "bugging us" except that so much speculating is going on without any actual proof! 

Sept 9, 2015 15:19:53 GMT Admin said:
That Hazy Daze video is excellent, thanks for all the great work you're doing Jamie!

Thank you for being genuine about flat earth. That is all anyone could ask or hope for when seeking truth.  

Sept 24, 2015 3:23:23 GMT susie said:
Not sure where to note this.

facepunch.com/showthread.php?t=1212781

-Article 1
The solar energy designers at Rawlemon have created a spherical, sun-tracking glass globe that is able to concentrate sunlight (and moonlight) up to 10,000 times. The company claims that its ß.torics system is 35% more efficient than traditional dual-axis photovoltaic designs, and the fully rotational, weatherproof sphere is even capable of harvesting electricity from moonlight.

The ß.torics system was invented by Barcelona-based German Architect André Broessel. He sought to create a solar system that could be embedded in the walls of buildings so that they may act as both windows and energy generators. But the project isn’t only noteworthy for its solar efficiency capabilities - the ß.torics system is designed to generate lunar energy too!

The spheres are able to concentrate diffused moonlight into a steady source of energy. The futuristic ß.torics system is catching a lot of attention for its clean and beautiful design. (Despite solar power’s huge potential, we haven’t seen too many beautiful solar power technologies). We’re excited to see how architects will incorporate these energy generating orbs into alternative energy agendas and future building designs!

-Article 2-
It looks like a giant, glass marble. But this globe is no game. It's a sun-tracking, solar energy concentrator created by Barcelona-based architects Rawlemon and, according to the designers, is able to collect not just sunlight but moonlight as well.

The weatherproof sphere is designed to rotate and follow the sun across the sky. It's so sensitive to light that at night, it can even harvest moonlight and convert it into electricity.

Andre Rawlemon, the architect and designer, says his spherical, sun-tracking glass globe is able to concentrate sunlight and moonlight up to 10,000 times and that the system is 35 percent more efficient than photovoltaic designs that track the sun. One of Rawlemon's idea is to build these globes into the exterior walls of buildings and use them to generate electricity.

-Sources-
inhabitat.com/rawlemon%E2%80%...rom-moonlight/
news.discovery.com/tech/rawle...on-120918.html

Sept 27, 2015 19:26:58 GMT alba said:
National Geographic
LUNAR DISK
They didn't call it a satellite, or a sphere, they called it a disk

Question
Why does the lunar disk precisely cover the solar disk during an eclipse;  is it just an extraordinary coincidence?

Answer
Yes, it IS coincidence that both the Sun and Moon have the same angular size in the sky, allowing the  Moon  to 
precisely cover the solar disk. 

Although the Sun's diameter is about 375 times larger than the Moon's, the Sun is also about  375 times farther 
away. Both, therefore, appear to have an angular diameter of about 1/2 degree as seen from Earth.

Because tidal forces are gradually slowing the Earth's rotation and increasing the Moon's  distance  from  Earth, 
thousands of years from now the Moon will appear smaller in the sky and NOT be able to cover  the  Sun's  disk. 

That will leave future generations with only ANNULAR eclipses, showing a bright ring of  light  around  the  Moon 
during totality. 

Answered by: Paul Walorski, B.A., Part-time Physics/Astronomy Instructor
...

It's all coincidental, and 'Physics/Astronomy Instructors' have the theoretical equations to prove it.

Sept 27, 2015 20:35:12 GMT schpankme said:
Sept 27, 2015 19:26:58 GMT alba said:
National Geographic
LUNAR DISK
They didn't call it a satellite, or a sphere, they called it a disk

...

It's all coincidental, and 'Physics/Astronomy Instructors' have the theoretical equations to prove it.

Oct 4, 2015 9:13:34 GMT damnice said:
Sept 27, 2015 20:35:12 GMT schpankme said:
...

It's all coincidental, and 'Physics/Astronomy Instructors' have the theoretical equations to prove it.

The movement/gravitational concepts around the Moon logically help prove the heliocentric/geocentric model is impossible and there is nothing scientific about their Newtonian double-think fallacy.
Gravity supposedly causes mass to come together, but the Moon is moving away?
The Moon is pulling on the Earth and the Earth is pulling on the Moon yet the distance increases?
The Moon causes the tides and the tides are slowing the rotation of Earth yet speeding up the revolution of the Moon which supposedly causes the distance to increase (remember my post about gravity violating the LAW of Conservation of Energy, ZING!)?
If that were true then you can backtrack the distance and speed of the Moon. Supposedly the Moon is also 4.5 billion years old in the Sagan school of make believe so we'd end up having an impossibly close and impossibly fast revolving Moon. Due to another law, called angular momentum, the closer it gets the faster it would revolve around and the harder it would actually fly away. This is also contradictory since gravity would have to change properties and become outrageously stronger between both bodies to hold the orbit because increasing the spinning creates a gyroscopic procession force changing the relation of the Moon to Earth. These properties are ignored in all the Newtonian equations about the self-distancing phenomenon of Lunar orbit.

TL;DR
The Moon isn't a spinning ball speeding up its revolving speed while slowing down its rotational speed while moving away from a larger spinning ball Earth that is slowing its rotational speed while increasing its revolving speed around ANOTHER spinning ball Sun that is slowing its rotational speed due to "tidal forces".

Damn my brain hurts from all the angular momentum & gyroscopic mathematics I had to glance over for all this. Here you go kids, don't hurt yourselves.

Small but very important excerpt from that brain baking pdf.
"We will also review below the well-known fact that spin states under rotations behave essentially
identical to angular momentum states, i.e., we will find that the algebraic properties of operators
governing spatial and spin rotation are identical and that the results derived for products of angular
momentum states can be applied to products of spin states or a combination of angular momentum
and spin states."

Kenneth Vaz wrote:Hey Guys, so ive got my head wrapped around all the flat earth concepts and im Pretty much a Flat Earther now. But i have a few questions and i hope someone could answer so im clear.

So we dont believe in Gravity, So what is keeping the Sun and Moon in Orbit in the flat earth model.?