NASA Video Fakery

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:02 pm

Posted by questioneverything on 05/09/2015
I think the crazy thing about the ISS is that gal's hair. It sure doesn't look like it's floating! It just looks like it's teased up and has a half a can of hair spray in it.
It doesn't even move around as she moves, it just stays in formation with a tiny bounce when she turns her head.

This stuff is so obviously fake to me now, I'm kicking myself for not putting it together sooner. But I do believe, if we're open to guidance, we'll be led to find the truth eventually.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:02 pm

Posted by Joe on 05/09/2015
The aforementioned showers . What a joke . So nowadays they cant have showers but in that magical spage age anything was possible NASA Video Fakery Showering_on_Skylab_-_GPN-2000-001710

NASA Video Fakery Showering_on_Skylab_-_GPN-2000-001710

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:03 pm

Posted by eschaton on 05/26/2015
I came across this video showing how easy it could be for them to fake some of this "zero gravity" stuff.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:04 pm

Posted by Admin on 05/26/2015
Awesome find Eschaton!

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:05 pm

Posted by supernaut on 07/26/2015
The Impossible Photo of Earth - NASA Apollo 11

What NASA and science claims: "The same side of the Moon always faces the Earth."

If this is true then a famous photo of Earth seen from the Moon during the Apollo 11 mission is impossible.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:06 pm

Posted by supernaut on 07/29/2015
Earth according to Nasa (2015)

Download picture: www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/187_1003705_americas_dxm.png

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:06 pm

Posted by Opie on 08/02/2015
Notice in this video at approximately the 3:00 mark it shows Scott Kelly in a retrospective video saying goodbye to fellow astronauts supposedly over two months prior to the current-day interview. However, the right collar of Kelly's shirt is turned up in exactly the same way as it is in the current-day interview. That suggests that the video portraying the exit of his fellow astronauts allegedly two months earlier was done on about the same day and approximately the same time as the current-day interview.

Also, notice that the Russian astronaut does not speak English, yet he is supposed to be sharing the space station for over a year with Scott. How are they going to communicate. Does Kelly speak Russian?

insider.foxnews.com/2015/08/01/astronauts-one-third-way-through-year-space-mission

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:07 pm

Posted by chubbs on 08/04/2015
Re: nasa green screening

I've heard many claims of this practice by NASA and it sure looks like that's what they're often doing, but I haven't yet seen a proper analysis of NASA videos for this technique.

In this video I've taken some stills of some nasa videos which some have called into question, and done a thorough comparison with some unaltered footage. What do you think? Busted?

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:08 pm

Posted by on 08/11/2015
Hope someone recorded the live streamed ISS space walk today (8/10/15). Bubbles in the pool at 1:20 - 1:23 timeline. Someone commented in a video on YouTube a few days back that the fake videos and CGI are so bad that it looks like NASA is trying to get caught in the act - I'm beginning to believe it.

ISS Space Walk:

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:09 pm

Posted by cropirate on 08/12/2015

Aug 11, 2015 0:11:28 GMT @skillet said:
Hope someone recorded the live streamed ISS space walk today (8/10/15). Bubbles in the pool at 1:20 - 1:23 timeline. Someone commented in a video on YouTube a few days back that the fake videos and CGI are so bad that it looks like NASA is trying to get caught in the act - I'm beginning to believe it.

Maybe they don't care any more, they know that the mainstream media doesn't ask the right questions.
This is so ridiculous, cleaning dust from windows in the Thermosphere. They say there are no molecules so that their human body don't feel the supposed 1500°C and the ISS doesn't melt. But they have dust on the windows.
I think they busted NASA a long time ago, but they made a deal and now they play the game all together, Russian,Japanese,Chinese,German, and so on. There is so much tax-payer money involved from all over the world just to keep the hole show on, and their laughing us right in the face.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:10 pm

Posted by csp on 08/12/2015

Aug 11, 2015 19:40:49 GMT cropirate said:
Aug 11, 2015 0:11:28 GMT @skillet said:
Hope someone recorded the live streamed ISS space walk today (8/10/15). Bubbles in the pool at 1:20 - 1:23 timeline. Someone commented in a video on YouTube a few days back that the fake videos and CGI are so bad that it looks like NASA is trying to get caught in the act - I'm beginning to believe it.

Maybe they don't care any more, they know that the mainstream media doesn't ask the right questions.
This is so ridiculous, cleaning dust from windows in the Thermosphere. They say there are no molecules so that their human body don't feel the supposed 1500°C and the ISS doesn't melt. But they have dust on the windows.
I think they busted NASA a long time ago, but they made a deal and now they play the game all together, Russian,Japanese,Chinese,German, and so on. There is so much tax-payer money involved from all over the world just to keep the hole show on, and their laughing us right in the face.

The problem is they've already sold the lie.. so NASA obviously don't need to put too much effort into things these days. Like my father, who still will not admit it's all fake - even after I saw his eyes light up when I show him all the different continent sizes from NASA, and the fact there is no timelapse videos of the earth spinning with clouds moving.. he want's to accept it.. but he just can't.

I think Mark Twain said it best:
“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.”

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:10 pm

Posted by schpankme on 08/15/2015

Aug 14, 2015 18:33:12 GMT generationofenoch said:
this video is fake
there is no shadow of the moon on the earth!

Pure Magical Earth bullshit.

NASA Video Fakery Sol-eclipsegeom-wads

"there I was on the edge of the water on a beautiful night with the moon glowing, and suddenly
I looked down and saw my shadow. I thought that was so cool, I'd never seen it before."

Cat Stevens - Moon Shadow (1970)

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:11 pm

Posted by Douglas Sea on 08/21/2015
Watching the weather channel trying to pimp the spinning ball with fake shots of the hurricane from the international silliness station it is quite obvious that either the ball is too small or North America is too large...quite comical indeed

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:12 pm

Posted by wormwood on 09/11/2015
This is what I found recently.... and guess what ? another shot in a foot for NASA.
1,29 - AURA satellite shooting around the "globe" with this big ass solar panel where the in the same time earth spin - "....which yields the equatorial speed in mean solar hours given above of 1,674.4 km/h."

I don't know what to say...

2.bp.blogspot.com/_KI0WhXBoIN8/TK1IcxKnElI/AAAAAAAAADE/vYuMO83oMa0/s1600/southpark.gif

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:13 pm

Posted by ziming on 09/11/2015
I like how one of the crew members conveniently mentions global warming during this video. No Space Drama!

Also check out the dude with the spiked hair...

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:14 pm

Posted by rare on 09/17/2015
I'll just leave this here because it's been bothering me for about a month now. If someone can explain this other than my understanding I'd appreciate it.

The pressure in an EMU/EVA space suit is set at 4.3psi. The eqv to the pressure at ten feet underwater in a pool (.433psi/ft normal water). The training suits used in the NBL pool are also set at 4.3 psi to match so that the training simulates space movement.

The pressure in the ISS is set to the same as sea level (14.7psi) hence the astronots have to decompress when coming back in (the same as if they'd just spent hours underwater at 4.3psi and vice versa for leaving/purging).

At about 3psi the fluid in the body would start to boil and solidify in microgravity as it would in water of the same pressure.

The speed and declination of the ISS over the earth has no effect on this pressure against the suit outside. As if it isn't moving. As if they were stationary. But they're not. The ISS is supposedly moving at 5 miles per second. As soon as they left the station it would fly away from them surely? You're no longer a part of it? Like jumping from a train, no? Even tethered wouldn't you be dragged along? And when they drop stuff (which their videos show all the time. An entire tool bag in one video) without air resistance do these objects not become hurtling missiles, jeopardising everything in their path? Have you ever seen how ships dock with the ISS? They actually supposedly have to go four minutes faster than 5 miles per second and then do a U-turn and wait for the ISS to catch up at which point they 'brake' until they become level. Right.

This docking procedure would be as dramatic as Interstellar but they do it with ease constantly, and don't get hit by that tool bag.

Back to the suits.

The suits in space operate in the same pressure as under 10ft of normal water because that's what the suit in the pool is set to?

Why is 4.33psi the magic number to enable mobility in space which just happens to also be the same psi used to work with mobility around ten feet underwater? Which came first? Chicken/egg. That's the bit I can't get my head round.

And why are the Russian-Chinese suits set at a different psi (5.7)? Because they work at different depths?

A weighted suit in the NBL pool is set at 4.3psi to simulate movement in space. The exact same pressure required to operate said suit at 10-20ft under water is the same as required in space (moving at thousands of miles per hour/constantly descending). Chicken/egg.

In water 6-10psi in the suit and you can't move. Below 4.3 you start to float up and at 3 you start to boil.

The suit in space is set at 4.3psi. The exact same pressure required to operate effectively at 10-20ft under water.

Repeat this:

The suit in the NBL pool is set at 4.3psi to simulate movement in space. The EVA suit is set at 4.3psi to correspond to the training in the pool. Chicken/egg.

The exact same level required for moving and not rising or falling in 10-20ft of normal water is the same level required for movement in space. But the Russian/Chinese suits (the Chinese use Russian suits) operate at 5.7 psi.

Say it again and again until you have to lie down or get up and tell someone else. I'm not declaring anything other than I don't understand why or how the pressure in the two environments corresponds and why are the Russian/Chinese suits different? Shouldn't they be the same in the same environment? Help!

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:15 pm

Posted by damnice on 09/21/2015
If we didn't already know that the Pluto images were just another CGI rendered fakery, NASA puts aside all doubts and released this animated video showing the power of their amazing 3D programs to fake planets in space. In the "real" photos NASA released of Pluto, there again are never any stars. They don't even try that hard and they still fool 90% of the world with this crap, and WE'RE paying for it(if you're a tax paying US Citizen ofc).

Here is a brazen quote from New Horizons Principal Investigator Alan Stern:
"If an artist had painted this Pluto before our flyby, I probably would have called it over the top—but that's what is actually there." (emphasis mine)

Total misdirection and blatant admission of how they really do things. Get people to think that you think that truth is stranger than fiction so they'll think your fiction is truth. Hats off to this level of stratagem.

They also want us to believe that little ole Pluto can hold on to an atmosphere against the vacuum of space. Science is magical...seriously you have to believe in magic to believe this science.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:16 pm

Posted by marleyites on 09/22/2015

Sept 11, 2015 13:19:15 GMT ziming said:
I like how one of the crew members conveniently mentions global warming during this video. No Space Drama!

Also check out the dude with the spiked hair...

If you pause at .56, then watch the map in the background.
It looks like a flat earth map with the ice wall, but with ends chopped off.
What is the white strips on the top and bottom of the map?
Supposed to be north pole ice (top)
and antartica at the south? (bottom?)
If this is what it's supposed to be, the proportions of those 2 (north pole ice and antarctica) are wrong.
aren't they? it doesn't seem like antarctica should be that huge at the bottom of this flat map.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:17 pm

Posted by vortexpuppy on 09/22/2015

Sept 21, 2015 17:09:48 GMT marleyites said:
Sept 11, 2015 13:19:15 GMT ziming said:
I like how one of the crew members conveniently mentions global warming during this video. No Space Drama!

Also check out the dude with the spiked hair...

If you pause at .56, then watch the map in the background.
It looks like a flat earth map with the ice wall, but with ends chopped off.
What is the white strips on the top and bottom of the map?
Supposed to be north pole ice (top)
and antartica at the south? (bottom?)
If this is what it's supposed to be, the proportions of those 2 (north pole ice and antarctica) are wrong.
aren't they? it doesn't seem like antarctica should be that huge at the bottom of this flat map.

/s/ marleyites

I think this is a variation of the standard Mercator projection.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transverse_Mercator_projection

Shapes at the edges (infinity) are distorted, which conveniently hides the fact, that the south pole actually completely encircles us.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:21 pm

Posted by susie on 09/23/2015
NASA Video Fakery Se63hs

I found it here: tinypic.com/view.php?pic=se63hs&s=8#.VgJzsFI8LCQ

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:22 pm

Posted by susie on 09/24/2015
Get ready for more antics.
www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/watchtheskies/live-feed-of-sundays-supermoon-eclipse.html

NASA TV to Provide Live Feed of Sunday’s Supermoon Eclipse
For the first time in more than 30 years, you can witness a supermoon in combination with a lunar eclipse. Late on Sept. 27, 2015, in the U.S. and much of the world, a total lunar eclipse will mask the moon’s larger-than-life face.

Watch NASA’s live stream from 8:00 p.m. until at least 11:30 p.m. EDT broadcast from Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., with a live feed from the Griffith Observatory, Los Angeles, Calif. Mitzi Adams, a NASA solar physicist at Marshall will discuss the eclipse and answer questions from Twitter. To ask a question, use #askNASA.

Throughout human history, lunar eclipses have been viewed with awe and sometimes fear. Today, we know that a total lunar eclipse happens when the full moon passes through the darkest part of Earth's shadow, the umbra.

Sunday’s supermoon eclipse will last 1 hour and 11 minutes, and will be visible to North and South America, Europe, Africa, and parts of West Asia and the eastern Pacific. Weather permitting, you can see the supermoon after nightfall, and the eclipse will cast it into shadow beginning at 8:11 p.m. EDT. The total eclipse starts at 10:11 p.m. EDT, peaking at 10:47 p.m. EDT.

On the night of Sept. 27, 2015, a supermoon lunar ecllipse will be viewable in the night sky for those living in North and South America. Those living in Europe and Africa can view it in the early morning hours of Sept. 28.
Credits: NASA/Goddard
The moon does not make its own light; it reflects light it receives from the sun. During a lunar eclipse, the moon appears less and less bright as sunlight is blocked by the Earth’s shadow. As totality approaches, sunlight reaches the moon indirectly and is refracted around the “edges” of Earth, through Earth’s atmosphere. Because of this, almost all colors except red are “filtered” out, and the eclipsed moon appears reddish or dark brown. This filtering is caused by particulates in our atmosphere; when there have been a lot of fires and/or volcanic eruptions, lunar eclipses will appear darker and redder. This eerie -- but harmless -- effect has earned the phenomenon the nickname “blood moon.”

The live feed from NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center will offer views of the eclipse from not only the Griffith Observatory, but the Adler Planetarium in Chicago, Fernbank Observatory in Atlanta and other locations across the United States. The live feed is an alternative for those experiencing less-than-optimal weather or light-polluted night skies.

Learn more about eclipses and how NASA’s Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) will wait as Earth blots out the sun and the moon goes dark. LRO scientists embrace new possibilities, extending their scientific exploration to include eclipses and other events that can reveal more of the moon’s secrets.

If you miss this event, you’ll have to wait a while -- the next supermoon eclipse won’t occur until 2033.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:23 pm

Posted by vortexpuppy on 09/25/2015

Sept 24, 2015 11:01:21 GMT susie said:
Get ready for more antics.
www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/watchtheskies/live-feed-of-sundays-supermoon-eclipse.html

And here's more bullshit surrounding the blood moons and their supposed significance in September 2015
www.endtime.com/four-blood-moons/

Gotta laugh, they need donations.
Will write a cheque with my strawman and send them some of their fictive money back. lol.

And here a "scientific" spin on the same meme, using our lying, freemason brethren.
www.newtonsriddle.com/

Groan....

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:23 pm

Posted by susie on 09/25/2015

Sept 25, 2015 8:35:02 GMT vortexpuppy said:
Sept 24, 2015 11:01:21 GMT susie said:
Get ready for more antics.
www.nasa.gov/topics/solarsystem/features/watchtheskies/live-feed-of-sundays-supermoon-eclipse.html

And here's more bullshit surrounding the blood moons and their supposed significance in September 2015

And here a "scientific" spin on the same meme, using our lying, freemason brethren.
www.newtonsriddle.com/

Groan....

You see what is written here?? Talk about a load of bullshit.

by George Tirebiter Thu Feb 25, 2016 4:41 pm

Here's a NASA shill hard at work:

Astronaut Ron Garan Joins Balloon-Based Space Tourism Company

Arizona-based World View Enterprises, which aims to begin crewed operational flights by the end of 2017, has tapped Ron Garan as its chief pilot, the company announced today (Feb. 23).

"The name of the company is 'World View' for a reason," said Garan, who flew on the 2008 STS-124 mission of the space shuttle Discovery and spent six months aboard the International Space Station in 2011. [World View's Near-Space Balloon Rides in Pictures]

"They share a belief that I have — that seeing the planet from the vantage point that you'll be able to see on a World View flight can be transformative," Garan told Space.com. "And the more people that I think get that experience, the better off the world will be."

Here's the link to a video:

http://www.space.com/32015-world-view-ron-garan-chief-pilot.html?cmpid=514630_20160224_58591866&adbid=10153325947921466&adbpl=fb&adbpr=17610706465

by mitch Thu Feb 25, 2016 9:50 pm

ROSCOSMOS/NASA are two sides of the same coin...

Cosmonauts use the shower on the Soviet Union’s Salyut 7 space station, 1980s
http://humanoidhistory.tumblr.com/post/139822886105

NASA Video Fakery Tumblr_nz55r2Lc9w1qigaa4o1_1280

NASA Video Fakery Tumblr_nz55r2Lc9w1qigaa4o1_1280

Apollo 14 astronaut Alan Shepard shaves (and smiles!) during the Apollo 14 mission, February 1971.
http://humanoidhistory.tumblr.com/post/139801128520

NASA Video Fakery Tumblr_nz8qmfAH301qigaa4o1_400

NASA Video Fakery Tumblr_nz8qmfAH301qigaa4o1_400

"Tim Peake" chased through "ISS" by a "gorilla"

by Sponsored content

NASA Video Fakery

NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery

Re: NASA Video Fakery