Adolf Hitler - The Truth

Libertarian wrote:
Correct, it was a false flag operation by Mossad anyway:
https://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2012/07/the-munich-1972-massacre-was-psyops.html

In 1972 I was 17 years old. But knowing what I do now of how the false flag attacks are conducted, I wouldn't doubt it at all if nobody actually died at the 1972 Munich Games. I've grown so weary of the inundation of lies in my life by these psychopaths and their false flag stunts, I must admit I'm callused to even think about going back to review it. No doubt in 1972, and as a brainwashed young man, I accepted without question what I was told on the TV and newspapers without any hint of knowledge how the abject evil in our midst work (((their))) lying machinations. If people before my day believed shrunken skulls, lampshades, and soap was being manufactured by baby-bayoneting Germans, imagine my helplessness at 17 years old to understand how deranged minds justify such brazen lies in their conduct of psychological warfare against the peoples of earth.

Dear friends,

I was wondering what you think about Christopher Jon Bjerknes, if you ever heard of him. I watched a discussion between him and Adam Green called "Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik & Zionist w/ Christopher Jon Bjerknes" on bitchute (not available on youtube):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/9CDGFb3KTDR8/

In this interview he discusses his book series "Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist", here's a link to part one on Amazon:
https://www.amazon.com/Adolf-Hitler-Bolshevik-Zionist-Communism-ebook/dp/B07NQ3293V/

In addition to the interview, I browsed through the pages of some of his books which are free to read at Amazon. I made a summary for you of his main statements:

• Hitler was a communist Zionist
  
• He and his followers were the biggest controlled opposition in history
  
• The war was never meant to be won, so that bolshevik Russia could take over Europe
  
• The transfer agreement to Palestine with the Zionists was not fulfilled to get rid of the German Jews, but because Hitler was a Zionist himself. He fulfilled everything what Theodor Herzl wrote in his book about the Jewish state
  
• The holocaust was a Zionist eugenic program. It was done to get rid of the inferior eastern Jews, while the superior western (especially German) Jews were treated well. They wanted only Jews in Palestine who were able to contribute to the new Jewish state
  

Interesting also for the vegetarians among you: Bjerknes says (not in the interview, but in the book) that Hitler was not a real vegetarian, that he ate pigeons for example.
So what do you think?
I have three major problems with Bjerknes' theory:

• If Hitler was a communist, why the need for controlled opposition, hiding his real intentions? Why not use his talent as a public speaker to inforce the program of the KPD (German Communist Party)? Without the NSDAP they probably would have made the strongest party by 1932.
  
• If Hitler was a communist/bolshevik, who wanted Europe to be taken over by them, why the trouble of starting a war against Stalin, ending up with millions of casualties among his bolshevik "buddies"? Only to give Stalin a reason to strike back, so he could be the "good guy" in the end? Come on...
  
• Bjerknes is promoting the holohoax
  

I'm a very open minded person, open to almost anything, but there are exceptions. One exception is the "holocaust" because I've read a lot about it and I know it's a hoax. From my point of view this is Bjerknes' most vulnerable point. He even wrote an entire book, which is based on the asumption that the holocaust was real, called "Warnings to the Jews! Premonitions of the Holocaust":
https://www.amazon.com/Warnings-Premonitions-Holocaust-Christopher-Bjerknes/dp/1726064018/

However, to be fair we have to acknowledge that Bjerknes is pro free speech and anti censorship. He clearly states that he's open for debate with anybody. I would love to see him in a debate with Dennis Wise ("Adolf Hitler: The Greatest Story NEVER Told"). Or maybe Eric?  

Later,
Libertarian

Libertarian wrote:
Dear friends
what you think
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
[called] "Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik & Zionist

we have to acknowledge
that Bjerknes is
open for debate

Clearly, you did not read this TOPIC, therefore you came here to ASK this forum to swallow NAtional ZIonist JEW propaganda (what do you think?).  

This is no different then someone asking this Forum, how did the Lesbian on the ISS take photos of Earth (what do you think?).  

Let's debate this?

Political Party Conversion
Zionists > Bolsheviks > Communists > NAtional ZIonists (NAZI)

ABRAHAMIC Religions
JEW > CHRISTIAN > ISLAM

Corporate Ownership
NASA, News Media, Hollywood, Chrome, Google, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, other

Libertarian wrote:Interesting also for the vegetarians among you: Bjerknes says (not in the interview, but in the book) that Hitler was not a real vegetarian, that he ate pigeons for example.

What evidence is cited in the book for the claim Hitler ate pigeons?

For the meat eaters among you, watch Eric Dubay's Stop Eating Your Friends https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMRsS3VfbDY

And more recently, It's Not Your Fault https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8_xUiyWk0g

Schpankme wrote:Clearly, you did not read this TOPIC

Sure I did, and I think I made it clear that I don't agree to Bjerknes. But he claims he can proof everything through documents, and he surely is not very popular among Zionists, so it would be kind of stupid to deny a debate.

markwilson wrote:What evidence is cited in the book for the claim Hitler ate pigeons?

You can look it up on page 130 of the first book I linked.

Libertarian wrote:

markwilson wrote:What evidence is cited in the book for the claim Hitler ate pigeons?

You can look it up on page 130 of the first book I linked.

Why don't you provide needful evidence from the one solitary page since you already have the book? Are you going to pony up, or not? I'm not buying it (the book, his claim, or your parroting of it). I can't imagine a quote or two from one page takes up much cyberspace here. Did the man provide any evidence whatsoever, or did he just make the claim without any proof, that Hitler chose of all the animals much more probable to attract back to the meat-eating fold, a recalcitrant vegetarian who nonetheless had convinced himself that of all animals, scrawny little pigeon was the most delectable fare that he could eat without bothering his vegetarian ethics?

I'm guessing, since you did NOT provide needful quotes citing the evidence supporting the claim, now in two posts, you have no credible quotes you can offer. Had it been me, and I had the goods, I would have immediately copy/pasted said citation.

markwilson wrote:

Libertarian wrote:

markwilson wrote:What evidence is cited in the book for the claim Hitler ate pigeons?

You can look it up on page 130 of the first book I linked.

Why don't you provide needful evidence from the one solitary page since you already have the book? Are you going to pony up, or not? I'm not buying it (the book, his claim, or your parroting of it). I can't imagine a quote or two from one page takes up much cyberspace here. Did the man provide any evidence whatsoever, or did he just make the claim without any proof, that Hitler chose of all the animals much more probable to attract back to the meat-eating fold, a recalcitrant vegetarian who nonetheless had convinced himself that of all animals, scrawny little pigeon was the most delectable fare that he could eat without bothering his vegetarian ethics?

I'm guessing, since you did NOT provide needful quotes citing the evidence supporting the claim, now in two posts, you have no credible quotes you can offer. Had it been me, and I had the goods, I would have immediately copy/pasted said citation.

This book is most likely dis-information. This author relies on the gullible & uninformed. It was published/released only very recently a few months ago.

notdownunder wrote:
This book is most likely dis-information. This author relies on the gullible & uninformed. It was published/released only very recently a few months ago.

I came across a good commentary on Christopher Jon Bjerknes, here, https://tinyurl.com/trz9uen. It concisely addresses his agenda. Unfortunately, the YouTube account associated with the videos at the end of the article has been terminated for hate speech, something we're all too familiar when the Jews at Google/YouTube are involved. I tried to find the videos by "Gizmo the Cat" elsewhere to no avail.

It didn't take much research today to figure out Bjerknes is nothing more than another Jew mouthpiece with a Traveling Shoah Roadshow agenda.

Here's just one paragraph from the above article:

"In his new book, Adolf Hitler: Bolshevik and Zionist, Bejerknes offers nothing new to the field of World War 2 research.  His strategy is to dig up old discredited lies about Hitler and repackage them as cutting edge conspiracy theory (all of his videos do not allow comments and are restricted).  Why would someone who hates Jews use copious amounts of Jewish quotes, or Jew condoned quotes about Hitler?  Does he not understand how badly they lie about Hitler?  There are no quotes or footnotes referring to any of Irving’s books, which is just ridiculous.  He is the most well know revisionist on Hitler and the National Socialists.  Nope, instead Bejerknes relies on well-paid non-persecuted “scholars” like Ian Kershaw."

A common theme I discovered today, during the time I devoted to it, is that his material isn't footnoted, nor scholarly. That's why we're left with those who laughably claim Hitler had a penchant for pigeon meat though a vegetarian, and sans any credible evidence to prove it.

Regarding the farcical claim that Hitler was a Bolshevik, let's have the Great One, himself, address the matter:

“Never forget that the rulers of present-day Russia are common blood-stained criminals; that they are the scum of humanity which, favoured by circumstances, overran a great state in a tragic hour, slaughtered out thousands of her leading intelligentsia in wild bloodlust, and now for almost ten years have been carrying on the most cruel and tyrannical regime of all time.

Furthermore, do not forget that these rulers belong to a race which combines, in a rare mixture, bestial cruelty and an inconceivable gift for lying, and which today more than ever is conscious of a mission to impose its bloody oppression on the whole world. Do not forget that the international Jew who completely dominates Russia today regards Germany not as an ally, but as a state destined to the same fate.

The danger to which Russia succumbed is always present for Germany. Only a bourgeois simpleton is capable of imagining that Bolshevism has been exorcised. With his superficial thinking he has no idea that this is an instinctive process; that is, the striving of the Jewish people for world domination, a process which is just as natural as the urge of the Anglo-Saxon to seize domination of the earth. And just as the Anglo-Saxon pursues this course in his own way and carries on the fight with his own weapons, likewise the Jew. He goes his way, the way of sneaking in among the nations and boring from within, and he fights with his weapons, with lies and slander, poison and corruption, intensifying the struggle to the point of bloodily exterminating his hated foes.

In Russian Bolshevism we must see the attempt undertaken by the Jews in the twentieth century to achieve world domination. Just as in other epochs they strove to reach the same goal by other, though inwardly related processes. Their endeavor lies profoundly rooted in their essential nature.

Germany is today the next great war aim of Bolshevism. It requires all the force of a young missionary idea to raise our people up again, to free them from the snares of this international serpent, and to stop the inner contamination of our blood, in order that the forces of the nation thus set free can be thrown in to safeguard our nationality, and thus can prevent a repetition of the recent catastrophes down to the most distant future.

If we pursue this aim, it is sheer lunacy to ally ourselves with a power whose master is the mortal enemy of our future. How can we expect to free our own people from the fetters of this poisonous embrace if we walk right into it? How shall we explain Bolshevism to the German worker as an accursed crime against humanity if we ally ourselves with the organizations of this spawn of hell, thus recognising it in the larger sense?” —Mein Kampf, 1925 (emphasis added)

markwilson wrote:

notdownunder wrote:
This book is most likely dis-information. This author relies on the gullible & uninformed. It was published/released only very recently a few months ago.

I came across a good commentary on Christopher Jon Bjerknes, here, https://tinyurl.com/trz9uen. It concisely addresses his agenda. Unfortunately, the YouTube account associated with the videos at the end of the article has been terminated for hate speech, something we're all too familiar when the Jews at Google/YouTube are involved. I tried to find the videos by "Gizmo the Cat" elsewhere to no avail.

It didn't take much research today to figure out Bjerknes is nothing more than another Jew mouthpiece with a Traveling Shoah Roadshow agenda.

Bjerknes = Crypto-Jew

markwilson wrote:I'm guessing, since you did NOT provide needful quotes citing the evidence supporting the claim, now in two posts, you have no credible quotes you can offer. Had it been me, and I had the goods, I would have immediately copy/pasted said citation

Mark, you either misunderstood what I was writing or you didn't read it close enough. I was just giving the information that there's a guy named Bjerknes who says this and that. What you do with this information, is up to you, I was not supporting him in any way, so it's not my duty to provide any quotes. I also said that I browsed the freely available pages at Amazon, I don't own the book. I saw superscripts at the end of the quotes, but at Amazon there's no appendix visible, so I can't look up the source of these quotes. Also, the text in the Amazon preview is not selectable, i.e. I can't copy & paste anything here. They probably do this for copyright reasons.

I only came across this guy because I watch the "Know more news" channel from Adam Green from time to time. He makes a lot of very good anti-zionist videos, some of them already banned from Youtube (which is always a sign for me that s/th must be good about those videos).
You probably would say that Green is also pro-Jewish since he's friends with Bjerknes, but how does it fit together then that Youtube, which is controlled by Jewish B'nai Brith, is deleting videos from him?

Btw, I'm currently reading David Irving's book "Führer und Reichskanzler - Adolf Hitler 1933-1945" (German translation). It's the edition with foreword from 1989. And guess what - even Irving is promoting the holohoax in this foreword! He said something like "if this or that had been different, then the holocaust might not have happened". Something similar like that, I can try to find the original quote if you like. I was very surprised when I read this since I thought that at least from the mid 1980's Irving had a clear view on that subject.
And yet another surprise: I'm only on page 310 out of 800, but I already found the following statement: On 4/9/1940, after Denmarks surrender, on Hitler's evening menu was listed Makkaroni, bacon and green salad - Uhm, is bacon really veggie?  

Oh, another thing: I've read the entire "Mein Kampf" when I was a teenager, but that's long ago.

Peace,
L.

Schpankme wrote:
1934, Newspaper "Der Angriff" published a series of 12 articles titled "A Nazi travels to Palestine."  In conjunction with these articles, the NAZI Party produced a series of small brass coins, which were distributed within the U.S., Germany, and Palestine.

Are you sure your sources are right?
According to this article:
https://www.bpb.de/geschichte/nationalsozialismus/die-wohnung/195248/die-artikelserie-ein-nazi-faehrt-nach-palaestina
the coin was given to the subscribers of "Der Angriff", i.e. they were shipped by "Nazis", not NAZIS. Btw, as you can see by the name of the article series in "Der Angriff", the National Socialists sometimes, mostly in an ironical way, used the term "Nazi" for themselves.

Libertarian wrote:
National Socialists
ironical
used the term "Nazi"

Like I've stated, you have not read this TOPIC.  You are promoting the party line on behalf of the NAtional ZIonists (NAZI).

Should we debate:
NAZI ironically forgot to spell Nazi?
NAZI ironically forgets to put the Swastika on the same side as NAZI?
NAZI ironically promotes PALESTINE, where we find the NAtional ZIonists?
NAZI ironically promotes STAR OF DAVID in the land of the NAtional ZIonists?

SWASTIKA is ironically found on the same side as the word [Der] ANGRIFF, this German language newspaper?



Today, the Zionists spin the word "Nazi" to distance themselves from "NAZI" an acronym formed by combining two groups, the National Socialist Zionists with the Frankist Zionists, which became the NAtional ZIonists.

24 March 1933
"Judea Declares War on Germany"

Zionist Jewdaism, this political party and religion represented less than 0.70% of the German population (about 505,000 people), but controlled more than 75% of the German Infrastructure (Government, Banking, Trade, Media, Theaters, Railroad, Shipping, Metals, Property, etc).

25 August 1933
The “Haavara” or “Transfer” agreement was signed by the German Government and the NAZI's, this broke the Zionist policy against their "German goods boycott", and provided for, mostly orthodox Jews, to be emigrated into the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association (PICA) under the directorship of James Armand de Rothschild.

History 1933 - 1941
o German Army, responsible for recovering it's land and citizens annexed by the Treaty of Versailles.
o National Zionist (NAZI), responsible for staging and immigration of Jews into the new Zionist State within the region of Palestine.
o British government, controlled Palestine and were paid a service fee for each Jew immigrated into the Zionist State.

"Between 1933 and 1936 more than 370,000 Jews arrived in Palestine, increasing the Jewish population to 27%, and bringing about a significant deterioration in relations between Palestinian Arabs and Jews." ~ Krämer, 2008, pp. 239–240.

Libertarian wrote:
but how does it fit together then that Youtube, which is controlled by Jewish B'nai Brith, is deleting videos from him?
always a sign for me that s/th must be good about those videos

I think it's important to mention that YouTube also deletes channels that are controlled and run by misinformation agents. This makes the ignorant viewer think these channels spreads 'truths' they don't want us to know about, while in reality they misdirect their audience. Alex Jones is probably the best known example on this, but there are countless of others. So when video's or channels are deleted, this is NOT always a good sign for reliable info.

Just Vital wrote:

Libertarian wrote:
but how does it fit together then that Youtube, which is controlled by Jewish B'nai Brith, is deleting videos from him?
always a sign for me that s/th must be good about those videos

I think it's important to mention that YouTube also deletes channels that are controlled and run by misinformation agents. This makes the ignorant viewer think these channels spreads 'truths' they don't want us to know about, while in reality they misdirect their audience. Alex Jones is probably the best known example on this, but there are countless of others. So when video's or channels are deleted, this is NOT always a good sign for reliable info.

Exactly, Owen Benjamin was doing the same when talking about the Jews. These guys are dis info agents and controlled ops.

Schpankme wrote:Like I've stated, you have not read this TOPIC.  You are promoting the party line on behalf of the NAtional ZIonists (NAZI).

Instead of replying to what I've said, you start insulting me. Not a good basis for discussion.
I say it once again in unmisunderstandable words, so even you should be able to comprehend:
The article series in the National Socialist magazine "Der Angriff" was called "Ein Nazi fährt nach Palästina". So who is calling who a Nazi? The National Socialist, who traveled to Palestine with his National Zionist friend Kurt Tuchler and who wrote this series, was SS-Untersturmführer Leopold von Mildenstein. He wrote it under the pseudonym "Lim". Here's a picture from "Der Angriff":



If you haven't understood it by now, once again: The Nazi in the series is the German National Socialist von Mildenstein.
You still haven't given any source that the brass coin was distributed by the National Zionist Party.
You just repeated things we already know.

We might as well be talking about Logan Paul in this thread as Christopher Jon Bjerknes. Either will do as a spectacle inserted as a distraction. Go back and look at the post in which Bjerknes' name began an infestation here. Only his name in the post was bolded in a rather lengthy comment. Yes. His name insertion here is deserving of all-bold font. And now, rather than using the thread as was intended we're babbling about come-lately buffoons making totally bogus claims in support of the Eternal Shoah Roadshow.

The same comment in which the Bjerknes stink bomb was set off we're told, "vegetarians among you: Bjerknes says...."

That's right. Knowing that Eric is a vegan, and many others of us here as well, we're condescendingly made fun of while neither his boy, nor he, states anything of value that can contravene the truths demonstrable in nature that man was in fact designed an herbivore. But, by golly, we know Hitler must have been evil, because he's alleged to have eaten pigeon meat; without doubt the most tasty morsel of meat man can avail himself of.

Maybe if, as Schpankme has pointed out, the thread was read with an understanding that what the peoples of earth have been told about Hitler, the German people and WWII, were mostly audacious lies/propaganda, while vile war criminals like Eisenhower are coddled in the history books, that the purpose of the thread is to derive at a better understanding of the tactics of the Jews, who according to Henry Ford are the "The World's Foremost Problem," and as they have relentlessly attacked the German people, including the leadership of the German government, personified as evil in the lightning pole that is the name, Hitler; this is NOT a launch pad for the introduction of loonies like Bjerknes.

And while people are now being jailed in some countries just for challenging the shibboleth "six million," the most infamous lie of WWII, we're playing patty-cake with the nonsensical ramblings of somebody as brilliant as the person who could just as easily be the distraction inserted to dissemble with; Logan Paul.

"How shall we explain Bolshevism to the German worker as an accursed crime against humanity if we ally ourselves with the organizations of this spawn of hell, thus recognising it in the larger sense?” —Mein Kampf, 1925 (emphasis added)

And if you're not here to help us in that regard, why don't you find an appropriate thread for the agenda you bring.

Libertarian wrote:
1) I only came across this guy because I watch the "Know more news" channel from Adam Green from time to time....You probably would say that Green is also pro-Jewish since he's friends with Bjerknes

2) And guess what - even Irving is promoting the holohoax in this foreword!

1) Yes, both are pro-Jewish. Thanks for pointing that out. Is it "Green," or "Greenberg"? I've seen it both ways. What are the odds?

2) If you mean to say that David Irving understands that nobody was being gassed by Germans during WWII, much less Jews, and that the altar to "six million" is built before the vile war-mongering god of the Jews, then might it not be just as easily said that David Irving promotes the truth about WWII and the barbarian tribe, in general? When the table was put on display with Jew soap, Jew lampshade, and Jew shrunken skull, and Germans forced to march in front of it, would you say that was a hoax? Or are are you still buying the fairy tale from the Professional Persecuted Class that Evil Hitler had industrialized the production of useful commodities from the bodies of the Jews he was gassing, for the discerning baby-bayoneting Hun?

Libertarian wrote:
comprehend:
the National Socialist magazine "Der Angriff"

"Ein Nazi fährt nach Palästina"
The National Socialist who traveled to Palestin

SS Leopold von Mildenstein
wrote under the pseudonym "Lim"

1) Der Angriff (means The Attack) Newspaper

2) "Zionist-Socialist Workers Party or S.S. was a Jewish socialist political party." ~ Wikipedia

3) by combining the "Zionist-National Socialists Workers Party" (S.S.) with "Frankist Zionists", they became the NAtional ZIonists.

• note in example 2, Wikipedia omitted the word National.
  
• The Zionists do love their acronym's.

4) 25 August 1933 - The “Haavara” or “Transfer” agreement was signed by the German Government and the NAtional ZIonists, this broke the Zionist policy against their "German goods boycott", providing for staging and emigration of German Orthodox Jews into the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association (PICA) under the directorship of James Armand de Rothschild (Frankist Zionist).

5) a Coin was minted commemorating the NAtional ZIonist success over the German People.

6) I've never heard Hitler or his Staff refer to their party as NAZI.  In fact, Hitler used phrases like, "our Nationalist Movement."

I didn't ask for his permission and will remove it if he has a problem with it, but I wanted to post today's article from Mike King's ANYT (Anti-New York Times), because we have an excess of cyberspace and it's an excellent article illustrating how insane minds are at work in the Earth today. Original link: http://tomatobubble.com/id1352.html

FRIDAY / NOVEMBER 22, 2019


The home where Hitler was born, right, in the downtown area of Braunau am Inn, near Austria’s border with Germany.

NY Times: Hitler’s Birth Home in Austria to Become a Police Station

The authorities decided to turn the house in Braunau into a law enforcement hub to deter neo-Nazi pilgrims.

REBUTTAL BY THE ANTI NEW YORK TIMES

A few years ago, after years of pressure from "the usual suspects," the government of occupied Austria finally committed to "doing something" about the sacred place where St. Klara gave birth to The Great One (that's Hitler for you newbies and normies) on April 20, 1889. After the state acquired the property at Salzburger Vorstadt 15, a commission announced that the best course of action would be to tear the house down in order to "demystify a site that has become a magnet for neo-Nazis as well as tourists."

The Anti-New York Times is very happy to report that the contemplated blasphemy of destruction will not be occurring after all. That's the good news -- and it is very good news indeed. However, for devotees of The Great One, the veneration of the historical location will become more challenging than ever.

From the article:

"After years of wrangling over the future of the butter-yellow house in Austria where Hitler was born, the authorities have decided to turn the building into a police station, in a bid make it less of a magnet for neo-Nazis.

With the move, announced by the interior minister on Tuesday, the Austrian authorities hope to send a clear message to supporters of far-right extremism that the three-story building in downtown Braunau am Inn, near Austria’s border with Germany, will not be a shrine to Hitler.

“The future use of the house by the police should send an unmistakable signal that the role of this building as a memorial to the Nazis been permanently revoked,” Wolfgang Peschorn, the interior minister of Austria, said in a statement.

Oh well. -- Yours truly will have to remove the laying of a wreath at Salzburger Vorstadt 15 from the lifetime "bucket list." Wouldn't want to be nabbed red-handed by "zee authorities" of the new police station. Maybe I'll just have it sent via 1-800-FLOWERS.




1. St. Klara Hitler died when Adolf was just 18.  // 2. The Baby Great One -- Isn't he just adorable? // 3. Salzburger Vorstadt 15 escapes the wrecking ball!




Neither the Jews nor the commie / libtards of Europe are complaining about the continued existence of the birth house of the evil Karl Marx in Trier, Germany (Image 1) -- or his massive tomb & grave-site in London (Image 2). Both of these unholy sites still attract demented devotees of the mad father of mass murder (note the flowers) who represented all that The Great One tried to save us from.

In the hopes of waking and re-balling the once great German / Austrian people (or at least a handful of them), we interrupt this latest spectacle of self-abuse (their proud national pastime) with a dose of historical truth.

1914: The international bankers (cough cough) behind the New World Order crime gang imposed World War I upon peaceful Germany. But that wasn't the worst thing they did to the German people.

1919: By trickery and duress, the victorious NWO then imposed the subsequent inhumane Treaty of Versailles -- an atrocity which tore apart chunks of German and Austrian territory and ruined their economies. But that wasn't the worst thing they did to the German people.



1. Woodrow Wilson had no business whatsoever declaring war upon Germany and Austria-Hungary. // 2. The monetary reparations imposed by the Versailles Treaty were unpayable. // 3. After the collapse of Germany's currency, French invaders marched into unarmed Germany and collected physical resources instead. German citizens who complained were harassed at bayonet point and sometimes killed.

1939: The usual suspects then re-imposed World War (Part 2) upon Hitler's resurgent yet still peaceful Germany. But that wasn't the worst thing they did to the German people.




The above headlines confirm that it was Britain & France which started the war against Germany, not vice-versa.
1. "(Britain) Plans For a Long War -- Blunt Reply To Goering's Peace" // 2. "(British) War Cabinet Ready For Long War, Will Win At All Costs" // 3. "French Invade Reich"

1943-1945: The Allies carpet-bombed and fire-bombed crowded German cities, killing as many as 1 million civilians. But that wasn't the worst thing they did to the German people.

1945-1948: After winning the war and obtaining absolute mastery over the starving German people, the vindictive and victorious Allies (mainly Soviets, but Americans also participated) raped as many as two million women and murdered / caused the deaths of as many as 10 million defenseless Germans. (See "Hellstorm" --- if you've got the stomach for it!) But that wasn't the worst thing they did to the German people.




1 & 2. Relentless fire-bombing of women, elderly and children. // 3. Deliberate starvation and disease-killing of 1.5 million exposed German POWs

The aforementioned crimes against humanity killed off many fine Germans, but never even came close to killing a whole people. When the book of history is finally closed on the extinct German race, honest future historians (if there will be any) will, above all, cite the suicidal guilt complex that was instilled in three post-war generations of German (and Austrian) children as the cause of the voluntary extinction. There is no coming back from that psychological atrocity -- a mental sickness, based on trauma and lies, which compels highly infertile German and Austrian libtards to actually welcome the Turd World invasion of one of the few remaining lands of the last pure Aryans. "Vee vere responseeble for zee Holocaust. So vee must velcome effryone." -- recites the obedient Teutonic libtard of manly Merkel's Marxified realm.

It's such a tragic state-of-affairs. Please God, may the sacred site at Salzburger Vorstadt 15 -- which has been spared -- one day become the focal point for a Germanic reawakening.




Pathetic, virtue-signalling German / Austrian libtards are so very proud of committing national suicide as a means of atoning for the Holohoax.

The Allies carpet-bombed and fire-bombed crowded German cities, killing as many as 1 million civilians

My father survived this massacre. His neigbours weren't that lucky.

"Vee vere responseeble for zee Holocaust. So vee must velcome effryone." -- recites the obedient Teutonic libtard of manly Merkel's Marxified realm

I don't know what that language is, but let me translate it to German: "Wir waren verantworlich für den Holocaust. Also müssen wir jeden willkommen heißen".
I also don't know what "libtard" means, but if it refers to "liberal retards", then I can assure you: No, the Germans are not liberal, they're just brainwashed social democrats. In addition to the forced mass migration Germany's economy is being destroyed by the new "eco" fascism. I hate to say this as a libertarian, but the only solution to the problem would be a time-limited dictatorship that gets rid of all the scum. After that a recovery would be possible until the state is no longer necessary, because the well organized German people can take care of themselves. But it won't happen. Gemany is finished.

Libertarian wrote:
National Zionist
wrote this series
SS-Untersturmführer Leopold von Mildenstein
He wrote it under the pseudonym "Lim".
Here's a picture from "Der Angriff"

Leopold Itz, Edler von Mildenstein was an SS officer and National Zionist (political party), "he supported the goals of Zionism". ~ Wikipedia
You cannot server two masters; my guess is that Hitler in agreement with immigrating Jews out of Germany to Palestine, placed his once personal body guard in charge.

"I am a Zionist ... I want every Jew to leave for Palestine." ~ Adolph Eichmann, 1939

Wikipedia States, "Otto Adolf Eichmann was a German-Austrian SS-Obersturmbannführer and one of the major organizers of the Holocaust, referred to as the "Final Solution to the Jewish Question" in Nazi terminology."

Schpankme wrote:You cannot server two masters

That's true, but let's have a look at the definition of Zionism. Here's a contemporary entry from my Brockhaus encyclopedia, 1935:



Zionism is just the wish for the Jewish people to live in an own state, Palestine. Therefore a Zionist is a person supporting that wish and doesn't have to be a Jew necessarily. This is the natural common ground between National Socialists and Zionists, and like it has been pointed out several times in this topic, this common ground was successfully utilized in the beginning of the NS era through the Havaara agreement. If Adolf Eichmann was a Zionist, he was the best person for that job.

Another example: I myself prefer not to have Jews around me, not because I hate all Jews, but because of their religious background ("we're god's chosen people"), similar to Muslims, btw. I would just feel better having people around me who don't think they're better than me. I couldn't care less where the Jews go, as long as it's not my country. Does this make me a Zionist? Probably only a 50 % Zionist, because for a 100 % Zionist the destination is very important, it can only be the "holy land", Palestine.

I believe that most of the people who call themselves Anti-Zionists do not oppose Zionism, but Judaism itself. They just use the word "Zionist" to avoid being called Antisemites (which most of the time doesn't even work, btw). I also don't understand why people call Donald Trump a Zionist. He loves Jews so much that he wouldn't want them to migrate from the United States to Israel.
Or am I missing something? Then tell me, please.

Libertarian wrote:
Zionism is just the wish for the Jewish people to live in an own state, Palestine
Zionist is a person supporting that wish and doesn't have to be a Jew necessarily

Zionist party aka NAtional ZIonist party is a political party.

Political Party Conversion:
Zionists > Bolsheviks > Communists > NAtional ZIonists (NAZI) Party, who classify themselves as that fake race called JEW.

Europa: The Last Battle
https://www.bitchute.com/video/s1nPYDj7KBEQ/

I don't know if some of you may have seen this already or not, but I highly recommend it and it is absolutely worth the watch. I understand that it is 12 hours, but the amount of information in it is incredible and it has everything. Download it and spread it around.