Adolf Hitler - The Truth

markwilson wrote:The "new battlefield" is obviously devoid of great men like Hitler. USA! Unser Seliger Adolf!*

*Translation: Our blessed Adolf!

"It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. [...]” —Adolf Hitler, My Political Testament, Berlin, April 29, 1945, 4 a.m.

Whether Germany wanted war or not is a moot point because the war happened anyway and the result was that Germany was destroyed.

Let's not forget that the Germans were globe believers (and still are), which is a far more relevant point.

Dual1ty wrote:

markwilson wrote:The "new battlefield" is obviously devoid of great men like Hitler. USA! Unser Seliger Adolf!*

*Translation: Our blessed Adolf!

"It is untrue that I or anyone else in Germany wanted war in 1939. [...]” —Adolf Hitler, My Political Testament, Berlin, April 29, 1945, 4 a.m.

Whether Germany wanted war or not is a moot point because the war happened anyway and the result was that Germany was destroyed.

Let's not forget that the Germans were globe believers (and still are), which is a far more relevant point.

What's the name of this thread? Why are you claiming that "the Germans were globe believers" (a rather broad brush you paint with there, presuming none in Germany were aware, or are presently aware, of water's nature to find level), and that your point that Germany was a community of "globe believers," is a "far more relevant point" in a thread titled "ADOLF HITLER - THE TRUTH," than the points I make in the spirit of the title of the thread?

No, I didn't presume that none in Germany were aware, because I didn't make a blanket statement. That's just what you're presuming I did.

Dual1ty wrote:No, I didn't presume that none in Germany were aware, because I didn't make a blanket statement. That's just what you're presuming I did.

Claiming that "the Germans were globe believers (and still are)," is not a blanket statement?! Will we next discuss what the meaning is "is," is? Is your position, coming on the coattails of a discussion in another thread, becoming weaker? Why the interest in this thread in which you've yet to offer anything in the spirit of the title of the thread?

I need some substance. You make a blanket statement and then think nobody will call you out when in the very next comment you deny the blanket statement "the Germans were globe believers (and still are)".

Is that a good argument to make? Shall we argue that the Americans were globe believers, and still are? And you want to do that under a thread regarding the truth about Adolf Hitler in the face of the lies of the (((barbarians))), which the thread is the antithesis of?

I'm going to beg out and give others a chance.

Okay, Mark, you got me. You're right and I'm wrong, if it makes you happy. You win.

Dual1ty wrote:

markwilson wrote:[...]

Are we on the new battlefield? If so, how do we prevail against our enemy?

The war against the ruling powers can never be won by material means, hence why Hitler failed and Germany was destroyed.

You've pissed me off, now. This thread is about the truth of Adolf Hitler vs. the lies of the Jews—now 9 pages worth—and I just went back through them all. Your first post in this thread, on page 8, had nothing to do with the truth about Adolf Hitler (i.e., the purpose for the thread), and lo and behold, here comes Mr. Dual1ty, with a specious agenda, and now having his ass kicked on that "new battlefield."

You come into this one looking for a fight, land on my comment in the face of 8 pages worth of comments, offer nothing but inane prattling, and all I see is asshole and elbow retreating from your ignominious defeat as you ride out on your horse, Agenda. Your commander should hand the reins over to another, because you don't even make a good foot soldier.

Send a dispatch to higher headquarters asking for new boots, because what you thought of your effectiveness while on Agenda, doesn't match the reality, thus now relieved of Agenda.

You're the living embodiment of how the enemy is going to be defeated on that new battlefield for the minds of men.

Dual1ty wrote:Okay, Mark, you got me. You're right and I'm wrong, if it makes you happy. You win.

On the way to turn over the reins of Agenda, swing by and let Mike King school you:

markwilson wrote:You've pissed me off, now. This thread is about the truth of Adolf Hitler vs. the lies of the Jews—now 9 pages worth—and I just went back through them all. Your first post in this thread, on page 8, had nothing to do with the truth about Adolf Hitler (i.e., the purpose for the thread), and lo and behold, here comes Mr. Dual1ty, with a specious agenda, and now having his ass kicked on that "new battlefield."

You come into this one looking for a fight, land on my comment in the face of 8 pages worth of comments, offer nothing but inane prattling, and all I see is asshole and elbow retreating from your ignominious defeat as you ride out on your horse, Agenda. Your commander should hand the reins over to another, because you don't even make a good foot soldier.

Send a dispatch to higher headquarters asking for new boots, because what you thought of your effectiveness while on Agenda, doesn't match the reality, thus now relieved of Agenda.

You're the living embodiment of how the enemy is going to be defeated on that new battlefield for the minds of men.

There you go. Get mad. Finally you've shown your true colors. You are simply a keyboard warrior (and a Hitlerite) with too much time on his hands and it's obvious. I've "pissed you off" and now you claim I have a "specious agenda" because I said things you don't agree with. Boo-hoo. I can smell the weakness through the computer screen, so keep hissing. Your diatribe against me is irrelevant to me, and I'm pretty sure it's irrelevant to everyone else here on IFERS, too.

Dual1ty wrote:
markwilson
You are a Hitlerite

Adjective
Hitlerite, relating to, Adolf Hitler, German politician and founder of the Nazi party, or his regimes or policies. ~ wiktionary.org

Neither Adolf Hitler (President of Germany) nor the German people aligned themselves with the Political Party called NAtional ZIonist (NAZI) Jew, aka the Zionist Party; not Nazi party as you have been indoctrinated to repeat (see above).

NAZI owned and controlled the Media, Railroad and Shipping Companies, etc, within Germany.
NAZI and the German Government sign the “Haavara” or “Transfer” agreement, 25 August 1933.
NAZI under the "Transfer agreement" built and ran the immigration camps throughout Germany.
NAZI gathered up entire family units of mostly Orthodox Jews, and under the fear of death from pestilence and war placed them in immigration camps.
NAZI used German Monies to stage and emigrate Jews, via shipping, into the British controlled Zionist State called the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association (see James Armand de Rothschild).

"Between 1933 and 1936 more than 370,000 Jews arrived in Palestine, increasing the Jewish population to 27%, and bringing about a significant deterioration in relations between Palestinian Arabs and Jews." ~ Krämer, 2008, pp. 239–240.

NAZI claim to be the first to invent Atomic pretend, via the News Media, 1939.
NAZI claim to place the first rocket in the man-made construct called Space, via the News Media, 1942.
NAZI claim to use Wunderwaffe, "Miracle Weapon" to attack Britain, via the News Media, 1943.
NAZI first to establish Russian and American Space Enterprise, which would start the Fake Space Race, via the News Media, 1945.

Schpankme wrote:

Dual1ty wrote:
markwilson
You are a Hitlerite

Adjective
Hitlerite, relating to, Adolf Hitler, German politician and founder of the Nazi party, or his regimes or policies. ~ wiktionary.org

[...]

Why are you implying that I agree with that definition? I don't. In fact I don't visit wiktionary.org at all, that isn't one of my sources. It's well known that "nazi" is a pejorative, doesn't matter which way it is thrown at. But yes, it makes more sense to me to use it for the NAtional ZIonists of Israel (or Judea).

Dual1ty wrote:
markwilson
You are a Hitlerite

it makes more sense to me to use it for the NAtional ZIonists of Israel (or Judea).

You didn't provide your meaning for "markwilson the Hitlerite"

Schpankme wrote:You didn't provide your meaning for "markwilson the Hitlerite"

Okay, fair enough, but I'm not interested in getting into a semantics discussion with you. Nothing personal, though.

Dual1ty wrote:

markwilson wrote:You've pissed me off, now.....

Finally you've shown your true colors.

Hitler dropped peace offers over London trying to avert war: http://www.tomatobubble.com/id763.html

Yes, I'm a Hitlerite. I admire what I know of the man, not what you don't know about him causing you to label me with the best insult you could pejoratively hurl at me without doing more damage to your cover. Thanks for noticing and the compliment, though.

But I'm curious; what is the reason you didn't just man-up and call me an "anti-semite." Isn't a Hitlerite an anti-semite in your jew-influenced mind? One riding the steed, Agenda, must work patiently while attempting to hide his own true colors. Isn't that correct?

"I then also directed an appeal to reason to the men responsible in the enemy states and to their peoples. I warned against further pursuit of the war, the consequences of which could only be devastating. I warned the French especially not to start a war which, by necessity, would eat its way inward from the frontier and which, irrespective of its outcome, would have dire consequences." —Adolf Hitler

Dunkirk, noun, 1 : a retreat to avoid total defeat —https://tinyurl.com/yxkujuku

He warned France. Tell us again what the Brits were doing on the wrong side of the channel? Can you say, "invading (((hordes)))"? Who was the aggressor? Who the empire builder, not satisfied with what she had? Btw, that movie you recently watched called Dunkirk— more Hollyweird Jew propaganda, just like Jew soap, Jew lampshades, and Jew shrunken skulls was Jew propaganda.

“Attack is the secret of defense; defense is the planning of an attack.” —Sun Tzu, The Art of War

Maybe Churchill can give you the insight you obviously lack: “Germany is becoming too strong. You must understand that this war is not against Hitler or National Socialism, but against the strength of the German people, which is to be smashed once and for all, regardless of whether it is in the hands of Hitler or a Jesuit priest.” —Winston Churchil

I'm taking bets that Dual1ty is an Eisenhowerite. [EDIT] i.e., the "terrible Swedish-Jew" from his college days.

"While we are rather inclined to believe that he [Eisenhower] was born in the United States, and was not a Jew, we leave open other possibilities pending additional research. At the very least he was a Zionist puppet who advanced various Zionist genocidal causes." —https://tinyurl.com/y6nq8nwv

Eisenhower's Rhine Meadows Death Camps Documentary

Now that we're back on track this thread, an interesting take on "the teririble Swedish-Jew," including a picture from the yearbook that framed him as such, and who slaughtered untold numbers in heinous war crimes—while not even discussing the mass-murdering Dresden bombing, a separate war crime on innocents, as distinct from the Swedish-Jew's vicious mass-murdering of prisoners of war, for whom the war was over after their cessation from it, and who were every bit as innocent as those at Dresden.

How many German soldiers, who were in a war at the behest of leadership endeavoring to stop the invading Red Terror (Bolsheviks, i.e., Jews) from the assault made on their country, never harmed another though bearing arms in that war? Were those who killed no man in their temporary call to arms, spared the cruel death Eisenhower's death camps (war crimes) purposely caused to be the death of those innocent men?

https://fathersmanifesto.net/eisenhower.htm

Some people stupidly believe the Jew propaganda industry.

Psychopath, noun,

1. A person who engages repeatedly in criminal and antisocial behavior without remorse or empathy for those victimized.
 
2. A morally irresponsible person.

3. A person with a personality disorder indicated by a pattern of lying, cunning, manipulating, glibness, exploiting, heedlessness, arrogance, delusions of grandeur, sexual promiscuity, low self-control, disregard for morality, lack of acceptance of responsibility, callousness, and lack of empathy and remorse. Such an individual may be especially prone to violent and criminal offenses.

QUIZ OF THE DAY: DOES EISENHOWER (EISENHAUER) EPITOMIZE "PSYCHOPATH"?

[EDIT] Strike up Hail to the Chief! All rise when the psychopath enters the room! Silly goy.

From the above link provided:

"The total tally of unacknowledged deaths among prisoners, refugees and non-expelled civilians comes to about nine million people between 1945 and 1950, far more than the number who died during the war itself. All of these deaths were surplus to those actually reported. Moreover, those deaths occurred in peacetime while the world media did not bother to report of them."

"The massacre of surrendered Germans at Dachau, the fire bombing of Dresden, Operation Keelhaul, and the intentional starvation of over 1,250,000 "disarmed enemy forces" [renaming POW's as such, and to circumvent Geneva Convention that POW's must be treated humanely] all clearly mark him [Eisenhower] as a war criminal and an embarrassment."

How about this tidbit from the above same link:

The Missing Holocaust

"I've checked out Churchill's Second World War [https://tinyurl.com/yy44f73j] and the statement is quite correct” not a single mention of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war. [I take the foregoing to mean the man tried to find those terms in a volume written by Churchill, and of 4,448 pages, and was unable to find any of them.]

This is astonishing.  How can it be explained?

Eisenhower's Crusade in Europe [https://tinyurl.com/y3n4wzdo] is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill's Second World War [https://tinyurl.com/y4yrg7vv] total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle's three-volume Memoires De Guerre, [https://tinyurl.com/y546ke5v] is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi 'gas chambers,' a 'genocide' of the Jews, or of 'six million' Jewish victims of the war."

"In 1941, the year we went to war, Eisenhower or 'Ike', was a lieutenant colonel [O-5] who had never seen battle in his life. Yet by 1943 he had become a four-star general [O-10] and Supreme Commander of the Allied forces in Western Europe...."

TWO YEARS, FIVE GRADES, DOESN'T HAPPEN, UNLESS A FAVORED SON.

I was 20 years U.S. Army. I have personal experience how outrageously improbable that such rise could ever happen except it be driven by a sinister agenda to get him to the place (((they))) needed him to be to wreak the maximum havoc he did.

The progression is Lieutenant Colonel (O-5), Colonel (O-6), Be (Brigadier, O-7), My (Major, O-8 ), Little (Lieutenant, O-9), General (O-10)

Figure the odds that a failure was promoted five grades in a two year period, over many men much more qualified, without an Agenda at work.

Search "douglas macarthur eisenhower incompetent," and watch the history (lies agreed upon) algorithms at work. Everything that is Eisenhower-found-MacArthur-incompetent is blatantly pushed to the top, not vice versa, even though he worked for MacArthur and MacArthur didn't even like him. "MacArthur once said “he [Eisenhower] was the best clerk I ever had.” https://tinyurl.com/y2nyec2v

I spent two years at Bad Tolz, Germany, 7th Army NCO Academy when it was located there. I was a map-reading instructor. See https://tinyurl.com/yxbrah4g I know a little about these things. We had a skit in which a part of MacArthur's Duty, Honor, Country, speech was presented to each new class. It was MacArthur who was respected by the rank and file, not Eisenhower. https://tinyurl.com/y6f8sag2

An O-5's basic pay today, with 20 years service, is $9,244 a month.
An O-10's basic pay today, same 20 years service, is $15,800.

We're supposed to believe he was capable of the incredible increase in expected military proficiency and expertise required to go from O-5, to O-10, in a mere 24 months?! Somebody who had never even seen battle at the beginning of that two year period?!

That would be like expecting a Private First Class (E-3) to be promoted in the same 2 years to the grade E-8, Master Sergeant, without distinguishing himself in battle. Pfffttt....

Figure the odds that an incompetent, German-hating war criminal, jumps in monthly pay relative to today's rates, $6,556 in just two years. History; lies agreed upon.

Dual1ty wrote:.

First post, this thread:

"So, the point being that anybody using “Hitlerian” ["Hitlerite"] as a relevant adjective to describe some incomprehensibly dastardly deed is actually revealing to the world that their minds are clogged with demented Jewish fairy tales...." —lizardking

and,

"So all those writers who use Hitler as an example of the greatest arch villain of all time are merely displaying their own brainwashing, or their own contemptible corruption, to all who have eyes to see."

Our Interior Minister thinks that the 2036 Olympics would be "unthinkable" in Berlin because it could be seen as a 100-years celebration of the 1936 Olympics.
https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1080125/german-interior-minister-dismisses-unthinkable-berlin-bid-for-2036-olympics-on-centenary-of-hitlers-games

Btw, if you didn't know already, here's a debunk of another Hitler tale, this time regarding the Olympics, which says that he deliberately ignored Jesse Owens because he was black:
http://www.hoaxorfact.com/celebrities/picture-of-jesse-owens-and-adolf-hitler-shaking-hands-at-the-1936-olympics-facts.html

Libertarian wrote:Our Interior Minister thinks that the 2036 Olympics would be "unthinkable" in Berlin because it could be seen as a 100-years celebration of the 1936 Olympics.
https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1080125/german-interior-minister-dismisses-unthinkable-berlin-bid-for-2036-olympics-on-centenary-of-hitlers-games

Btw, if you didn't know already, here's a debunk of another Hitler tale, this time regarding the Olympics, which says that he deliberately ignored Jesse Owens because he was black:
http://www.hoaxorfact.com/celebrities/picture-of-jesse-owens-and-adolf-hitler-shaking-hands-at-the-1936-olympics-facts.html

The link showing Owens and Hitler together is a Photoshop creation I believe. The same page agrees with that assessment. The picture doesn't show a handshake, it shows arms around one another. Hitler didn't snub Owens, and probably did shake his hand, but we do know Owen's own words dispel the myth that he had been ignored by Hitler. Chummy arms around one another, not so much. Owens wrote that FDR snubbed him, not Hitler. And I'm sure it's just a coincidence that Owens later had trouble with the IRS.

http://www.tomatobubble.com/hitler_jesseowens.html

Libertarian wrote:
https://www.insidethegames.biz/articles/1080125/german-interior-minister-dismisses-unthinkable-berlin-bid-for-2036-olympics-on-centenary-of-hitlers-games

From the article: "Germany last hosted the Olympics in Munich in 1972, where 11 Israeli team members were killed by Palestinian terrorist group Black September after they were taken hostage."

My, my... what a coincidence. The only other time Germany has hosted the Games, Israel was targeted, thereby associating Germany with an evil attack against Israel. Things strangely seem to fall in place for the Tribe so fond of their persecution. To continue being persecuted, the Professional Persecuted Class must always have a handy lightning pole for "anti-Semite" to be used against while they skip down the road toward the Wall chanting "six million, six million, oh Shoah, six million."

Here's another link showing the Tribe claiming the same "six million" figure during World War One while Hitler was yet a young man. I post it here since it was posted to YouTube just a couple weeks ago as people come together in an attempt to thwart The Ministry of Truth's algorithms suppressing truth. Let's see how long it takes YouTube to delete it ;-)

markwilson wrote:Things strangely seem to fall in place for the Tribe so fond of their persecution.

Correct, it was a false flag operation by Mossad anyway:
https://northerntruthseeker.blogspot.com/2012/07/the-munich-1972-massacre-was-psyops.html

Libertarian wrote:
it was a false flag operation by Mossad
the-munich-1972-massacre

"the victims of the Munich 1972 Olympic attack, where 9 Israeli athletes (I had previously said 11) lost their lives."
"PsyOPs"

 9 = Fake News Event
11 = Physical Assets involved
IX XI = Roman Judaeo-Freemasonry