Transparent/Translucent Moon

Zorch Martino has just taken these excellent Moon photographs showing stars appearing through the dark part of the crescent Moon:

Admin wrote:Zorch Martino has just taken these excellent Moon photographs showing stars appearing through the dark part of the crescent Moon:

images :

interesting, though I suspect it is something else. can he check his original files and give me the used camera, lens focal lenght, aperture, iso and shutterspeed?

Thanks

30-9-2018 (00:52,8:32), +-8 hours apart.

https://i.imgur.com/wUmubh2.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/3XpxCin.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/0E9fSn8.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/vgoyNRB.jpg

MMDC wrote:30-9-2018 (00:52,8:32), +-8 hours apart.

https://i.imgur.com/wUmubh2.jpg

Great pics, thank you.

Why do we see, what appears to be, similar positioned shadows in depressions?

Realearth wrote:

MMDC wrote:30-9-2018 (00:52,8:32), +-8 hours apart.

Great pics, thank you.

Why do we see, what appears to be, similar positioned shadows in depressions?

hi,
thank you for liking the photo's.
Regarding the similar positioned shadows, they indeed are the same at night compared to during the day or (in the same picture) relative to each other.
I notice they change depending on the waxing / waning cycle.
But, I do not know how it actually works. It can't be from the sun as they say, though. As the shadows would change visibly, over a relative short period of time. I would say.

I mainly posted the photo's to show the black and blue colour tint the moon has during day and night.

Take care,
MMDC.

Transparent Moon during day - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c3ZB6hWTzk&t=22s

NASA and modern astronomy maintain that the Moon is a solid, spherical, Earth-like habitation which man has actually flown to and set foot on. They claim the Moon is a non-luminescent planetoid which receives and reflects all its light from the Sun. The reality is, however, that the Moon is not a solid body, it is clearly circular, but not spherical, and not in any way an Earth-like planetoid which humans could set foot on. In fact, the Moon is largely transparent and completely self-luminescent, shining with its own unique light.

The Sun’s light is golden, warm, drying, preservative and antiseptic, while the Moon’s light is silver, cool, damp, putrefying and septic. The Sun’s rays decrease the combustion of a bonfire, while the Moon’s rays increase combustion. Plant and animal substances exposed to sunlight quickly dry, shrink, coagulate, and lose the tendency to decompose and putrify; grapes and other fruits become solid, partially candied and preserved like raisins, dates, and prunes; animal flesh coagulates, loses its volatile gaseous constituents, becomes firm, dry, and slow to decay. When exposed to moonlight, however, plant and animal substances tend to show symptoms of putrefaction and decay.

In direct sunlight a thermometer will read higher than another thermometer placed in the shade, but in full, direct moonlight a thermometer will read lower than another placed in the shade. If the Sun’s light is collected in a large lens and thrown to a focus point it can create significant heat, while the Moon’s light collected similarly creates no heat. In the "Lancet Medical Journal,” from March 14th, 1856, particulars are given of several experiments which proved the Moon's rays when concentrated can actually reduce the temperature upon a thermometer more than eight degrees.

So sunlight and moonlight clearly have altogether different properties, and furthermore the Moon itself cannot physically be both a spherical body and a reflector of the Sun’s light! Reflectors must be flat or concave for light rays to have any angle of incidence; If a reflector’s surface is convex then every ray of light points in a direct line with the radius perpendicular to the surface resulting in no reflection.

The following video was taken from a chapter in my book, "The Flat Earth Conspiracy," available here:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/ericdubay
https://www.amazon.com/author/ericdubay

I see you Mars!

Hi everyone,
I took a photo of the moon last night that really freaked me out.
The moon looks like the stars do in Eric's 'Stars are not Suns' video. It only looked this way for a few seconds. I wasn't able to capture it again.
I suspect this is why they have us all hiding in our homes. They don't want us to see what's happening in the skies.
I'd like to post it here but am not able to for some reason.

Can someone please advise how to post a photo here?
Thanks!
Dexter

Someone posted this on twitter showing a compilation of pictures taken over the span of 10 years showing the moon changing colors. If this is indeed legit, how could a solid ball of rock merely reflecting the sun's light change colors? If it is reflecting the sunlight, how could it be purple? Again, I'm not certain how legit this is, but if real then it seems to contradict what we're told about the moon and might lend more support to the moon clearly emitting its own light and possibly changing colors.

The moon is so bizarre, yet beautiful and it's hard to know what it really is

A video of a Tesla self driving car on autopilot confusing the moon for a traffic light. Very strange. I thought Tesla calculated the distance objects ahead and are equipped with an array of sensitive sensors to detect and correct such reactions. Do you think it detects the moon as local? Here’s the link:

https://www.reddit.com/r/SelfDrivingCars/comments/orz21z/tesla_autopilot_keeps_confusing_moon_with_traffic/

Another link:

https://interestingengineering.com/moon-tricks-teslas-full-self-driving-into-thinking-it-is-a-yellow-light

I have an honest question regarding the self luminating observation we have of the Moon. Is there some explanation as to how it does this?

I imagine quite often as to how the luminaries function, and since I've joined IFERS, a lot of my imagination has been clarified and put into perspective.

Still trying to wrap my imagination "around" the self luminating effect of the moon. Punny...
Especially in relation to the moons position to the sun... waxing and waning...
How?
Is there a thread in here somewhere giving some reasonable explanation?

Jack Aurora wrote:I have an honest question regarding the self luminating observation we have of the Moon. Is there some explanation as to how it does this?

I imagine quite often as to how the luminaries function, and since I've joined IFERS, a lot of my imagination has been clarified and put into perspective.

Still trying to wrap my imagination "around" the self luminating effect of the moon. Punny...
Especially in relation to the moons position to the sun... waxing and waning...
How?
Is there a thread in here somewhere giving some reasonable explanation?

I was looking this evening at a three quarter moon. Looked spherical and in my imagination I could see how it might be illuminated partially by the sun, however the sun was long gone. SO I know it's not the sun.

But why does it appear partially illuminated? If it has it's own light why does it appear to be a reflecting ball?

For me these are genuine questions. I may be dim and it's been explained here but bear with.

The moon never appears as a reflecting ball .

If the moon was a reflecting sphere then we would see a pronounced central hot spot dimming to the edges since the light would be scattered in all directions . Have a look at optics and reflective surfaces. It's a problem science is aware of.

Same applies to the planets - light is scattered by spherical surfaces so how do we see such objects in the way we do with telescopes . Simplest explanation is that they are luminaries .

nowhereelsetogo wrote:

Jack Aurora wrote:I have an honest question regarding the self luminating observation we have of the Moon. Is there some explanation as to how it does this?

I imagine quite often as to how the luminaries function, and since I've joined IFERS, a lot of my imagination has been clarified and put into perspective.

Still trying to wrap my imagination "around" the self luminating effect of the moon. Punny...
Especially in relation to the moons position to the sun... waxing and waning...
How?
Is there a thread in here somewhere giving some reasonable explanation?

I was looking this evening at a three quarter moon. Looked spherical and in my imagination I could see how it might be illuminated partially by the sun, however the sun was long gone. SO I know it's not the sun.

But why does it appear partially illuminated? If it has it's own light why does it appear to be a reflecting ball?

For me these are genuine questions. I may be dim and it's been explained here but bear with.

I know as an artist that the moon is not reflecting sunlight. Thus self illuminated.
But how?
Is this the great mystery of the moon?

I'm imagining that the Aurora lights hold some clues as to the luminating of the sun and moon.
Somehow the upward sound energy of earth at N pole and downward water energy of Polaris meet at some point up in the sky, to display as the Aurora lights. This energy is then distributed into the atmosphere. The sun disc and moon disc absorbs this energy to luminate and distribute it down as light. Perfectly balanced opposite light energy. One regenerative, one degenerative.

Any thoughts on this?

I'd say the great mystery of the moon is just a plain"what the hell is it?" .

No idea of it's reality . Perhaps it is a projection onto the dome .

I have further evidence as well, which I love to share with you. We are told the Moon’s phases are from Sunlight through the Sun ́s angle to the Moon, but this cannot be. Because if this was the case, during each lunar month, the Moon would be at a different angle to the Sun. It would be impossible for the phases to remain the same each lunar month, However, we are all aware that we get the same phases and same time on each lunar month.. If the Moon is orbiting the Earth, and both were orbiting the Sun, then six months later the Moon’s phases should have swapped over – and each lunar month, the phases should appear different but it never happened in recorded history.



This is professor Foster talking confidently about the moon. Full interview.