No Midnight Sun In Antarctica

markwilson wrote:

odolvlobo wrote:I will be traveling to Antarctica in January. I will be on a ship off the coast for three days, but I will also be on the ground in Villa Las Estrellas for part of a day. Unfortunately, I won't be south enough to show that there is no midnight sun, even though it is the right time of year.

Does anyone have any suggestions for any evidence that I can gather or research that I can do? Please make suggestions!

Did you go?

Yes, I went but I could not go ashore because of bad weather. However, I took this picture facing south at 1:30 am.

That's an intriguing photo . Am I right to think that you were in antarctic waters and , looking south , took that photo whilst the sun was north of you.

Also, did you happen to have a compass with you? How did it react?

Admin wrote:6 climbers, 6 peaks, 9,616 feet = 66666

The only reason for this article's existence is to bolster the myth that "at least there's 24 hours of sunlight most of the time."

6 climbers + 6 peaks = 12 = 3

9616 feet 9+6 +1+6 = 22

322

RedorBlue wrote:That's an intriguing photo . Am I right to think that you were in antarctic waters and , looking south , took that photo whilst the sun was north of you.

Also, did you happen to have a compass with you? How did it react?

He didn't answer your questions. If he was outside of the sun's closed circumpolar path around the north pole, he was not facing south as claimed when the picture was taken. The light from the sun would have been to his north. Any travel away from the North Pole (on a longitude line traveling from the Pole in a southward direction), while outside of the sun's closed circuit of travel around the Pole, would result in the sun being to the north when the observer is outside of its closed circumpolar circle of travel.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

So we can know for certain that at best his picture is of the sun located from between a northeast (early morning), to north (midday), to northwest (late afternoon) position relative to his own position outside of the sun's closed circuit to the north.

You're not wrong.

Reason I asked about the compass - did he judge he was looking south reading from a compass? Would be nice to know since the S dip pole is given at 64S 130E or there abouts.

Would the compass reading of South (if he used one) actually be pointing along lines of declination eastwards towards that dip pole ?, if you get my meaning - sun rise in the east in that photo maybe - but compass reading south . Just a thought .

Seems earths mag field is an unknown quantity according to mainstream view .
http://www.geomag.bgs.ac.uk/education/poles.html

FYI those wanting a better understanding of demonstrable facts in nature, there are 53 occurrences of "magnetic" in Eric's latest book, Flatlantis, in which the "North Pole [is] the magnetic mono-pole center-point of the flat Earth with Polaris, the North Pole star situated directly above."

Fifty-two of those occurrences reference magnetic attraction in the Earth in some way or other, and one references "electromagnetically" measured chakra points at the "seven energy centers" in the body.

A greater understanding can be found in his excellent book and we can support his efforts by purchasing a copy at,

https://www.lulu.com/spotlight/ericdubay

I'm glad to hear you enjoyed the book and really appreciate the kind words and support Mark!

RedorBlue wrote:That's an intriguing photo . Am I right to think that you were in antarctic waters and , looking south , took that photo whilst the sun was north of you.

Also, did you happen to have a compass with you? How did it react?

markwilson wrote:
He didn't answer your questions. If he was outside of the sun's closed circumpolar path around the north pole, he was not facing south as claimed when the picture was taken. The light from the sun would have been to his north. Any travel away from the North Pole (on a longitude line traveling from the Pole in a southward direction), while outside of the sun's closed circuit of travel around the Pole, would result in the sun being to the north when the observer is outside of its closed circumpolar circle of travel.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

So we can know for certain that at best his picture is of the sun located from between a northeast (early morning), to north (midday), to northwest (late afternoon) position relative to his own position outside of the sun's closed circuit to the north.

Sorry, for taking so long to respond. I did not have a magnetic compass with me. Sorry.

The ship was traveling directly north at the time of the picture towards Argentina. I verified it with a GPS compass. The picture is facing south, and not north.

I can't say where the sun was because it was not visible. However, as the picture shows, it does appear to south of me, but far enough away to appear below the horizon.

odolvlobo wrote:

RedorBlue wrote:That's an intriguing photo . Am I right to think that you were in antarctic waters and , looking south , took that photo whilst the sun was north of you.

Also, did you happen to have a compass with you? How did it react?

markwilson wrote:
He didn't answer your questions. If he was outside of the sun's closed circumpolar path around the north pole, he was not facing south as claimed when the picture was taken. The light from the sun would have been to his north. Any travel away from the North Pole (on a longitude line traveling from the Pole in a southward direction), while outside of the sun's closed circuit of travel around the Pole, would result in the sun being to the north when the observer is outside of its closed circumpolar circle of travel.

Correct me if I'm wrong.

So we can know for certain that at best his picture is of the sun located from between a northeast (early morning), to north (midday), to northwest (late afternoon) position relative to his own position outside of the sun's closed circuit to the north.

Sorry, for taking so long to respond. I did not have a magnetic compass with me. Sorry.

The ship was traveling directly north at the time of the picture towards Argentina. I verified it with a GPS compass. The picture is facing south, and not north.

I can't say where the sun was because it was not visible. However, as the picture shows, it does appear to south of me, but far enough away to appear below the horizon.

Your original post mentioned being "on the ground in Villa Las Estrellas for part of a day" back in January, shortly after the winter solstice. Villa Las Estrellas is at roughly 62 degrees south latitude.

If your "ship was traveling directly north at the time of the picture towards Argentina," I assume that means you had already been further south to Villa Las Estrellas and were on the return trip north. Correct me if I'm wrong.

The sun's circumpolar path around the North Pole expands its closed circular path around the Pole to roughly 23 degrees south latitude when at the Tropic of Capricorn at December solstice.



The above graphic isn't representative of reality since we know Earth is established on a plane. It merely puts in perspective where your ship was relative to the sun's southernmost circumference of travel around the North Pole; i.e., your ship appears to have been south of Argentina, north of Villa Las Estrellas, and traveling northward on the return trip if I understand it correctly.

Better representation of our plane reality:



There is no way you were facing the sun to the south of the position the picture was taken from. Once outside the sun's closed circumpolar path around the Pole the sun would have remained to your north, and would not "appear to south of [you]."

Correct me if I'm wrong.

Exactly Mark Wilson. Odolvlobo only has 3 posts on the entire forum and they are all in this thread trying to claim, without evidence, something completely contrary to what we know for a fact about the Sun's position on Earth REGARDLESS of flat or globe models. This is clearly a shill trying to obfuscate as they constantly come here to do.

Archival black & white Super 8 film footage shot from South Georgia Island (roughly 54 degrees south latitude).

https://mubi.com/films/end-of-summer-2014

It's only 28 minutes long. The only direct shot of the sun is at roughly 27 minutes, a sun seen moving beyond the horizon. Since it is claimed to be a "waning Antarctic summer, the film is a series of mainly static tableaux made over a 20-day period," I assume the footage was taken during a December solstice time frame.

Without a Mubi subscription I'm not sure where else one might stream it. It's on Mubi for a limited time. Here's a starting point for those interested: https://duckduckgo.com/?q=j%C3%B3hann+j%C3%B3hannsson+end+of+summer&t=ffab&ia=web

Hi guys. I’m researching the 24 hour midnight sun in Antarctica thing these days.. Of course I found all the CGI video with fake suns or the exchange of the word “north” to “south” videos and of course every single one of them is after 2016-2017 (we all know what happened those years, the great awakening of our true world). But yesterday I found this channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXQ3dofniNmfaSGqYNFBUxA. This is a guy with no views and followers that everyday uploads 3 videos from different Antarctic stations with 24 hour timelapses from stationary cameras. His channel description is “Yea its flat” He also says that his main channel is this https://www.youtube.com/c/CunninghamsLawVid and there he uploads videos like this https://youtu.be/HELkzxtchkw and this https://youtu.be/wnvDSmAAe_4.. So I have some questions:
1) What the fuck(!!!) is going on in his mind?
2) Is it possible to fake every single day time lapse?(I know it is they faked the whole moon landing for fu*k shake..but I’m just asking for the confirmation of the thing.)
I would like to see what your thoughts are friends!
P.s Eric your latest YouTube video about paranormal scared me out like sh*t!
Have a nice weekend peace from Greece

Not sure what you are finding so convincing about these videos. The ones I clicked on all showed night time, so they aren't even showing 24 hour daylight anyway. Why would you think "every single day is a faked time-lapse" when they are not even showing the 24 hour Sun? And every "video" is such a fast time-lapse of individual images that you could cut the camera at any frame and stitch it together without anyone knowing the difference. This is what an actual video of the 24 hour Sun looks like, quite different from the channel you posted, don't you think?

Admin wrote:Not sure what you are finding so convincing about these videos.  The ones I clicked on all showed night time, so they aren't even showing 24 hour daylight anyway.  Why would you think "every single day is a faked time-lapse" when they are not even showing the 24 hour Sun?  And every "video" is such a fast time-lapse of individual images that you could cut the camera at any frame and stitch it together without anyone knowing the difference.  This is what an actual video of the 24 hour Sun looks like, quite different from the channel you posted, don't you think?

If you search from December to February many videos are about 24 hour daylight but I totally agree with you Eric. They can easily manipulate those videos but that every day upload thing pigued my interest.. And the other thing is that this guy was or maybe still is a flat earther!! That's the most akward part to me..

I have been believing in, and constantly researching flat earth. The only thing I can't wrap my head around is the 24 hours of daylight and darkness in Antarctica. Can someone explain?

I want to thank everyone for giving me this information. I had heard the videos are fake of 24 hours of daylight. I have no problem with the proofs the earth is flat. I'm an auctioneer and sell comic books on YouTube and Whatnot. I use the line "The Earth Is Flat" every time I do my closing statement. I get laughed at but don't care because I know something is wrong. I have been researching flat earth and other truths for many years now. If the powers that be can hide one of the largest civilizations in recent history, (Tataria) they can surly hide the shape of the earth.

The point of my post was not to troll, but to find more information about Antarctica and the way the sun effects it. I appreciate all the info, Please continue.

Hello.
This's my first post here.

I am indeed a "flat-earth-er", and I found this video by a certain Robert Schwartz, where he claimed to have recorded a 24-hour sun in antarctica (antarctic and arctic time-lapses are his main thing on Vimeo):
(I can't post links yet) "What does the sun do at the Pole !?" by "Robert Schwartz" on Vimeo.

He also has many other similar videos showing things like star trails.

I ask to you folks, who know more than me, how can that work on the flat earth?
Or if it's fake, why would he fake it?

Thanks.

NiciesMan wrote:Hello.
This's my first post here.

I am indeed a "flat-earth-er", and I found this video by a certain Robert Schwartz, where he claimed to have recorded a 24-hour sun in antarctica (antarctic and arctic time-lapses are his main thing on Vimeo):
(I can't post links yet) "What does the sun do at the Pole !?" by "Robert Schwartz" on Vimeo.

He also has many other similar videos showing things like star trails.

I ask to you folks, who know more than me, how can that work on the flat earth?
Or if it's fake, why would he fake it?

Thanks.

What was your impression of the 24 hour video

Nym wrote:

NiciesMan wrote:Hello.
This's my first post here.

I am indeed a "flat-earth-er", and I found this video by a certain Robert Schwartz, where he claimed to have recorded a 24-hour sun in antarctica (antarctic and arctic time-lapses are his main thing on Vimeo):
(I can't post links yet) "What does the sun do at the Pole !?" by "Robert Schwartz" on Vimeo.

He also has many other similar videos showing things like star trails.

I ask to you folks, who know more than me, how can that work on the flat earth?
Or if it's fake, why would he fake it?

Thanks.

What was your impression of the 24 hour video

That "that doesn't make sense, if the sun is rotating all the way around the earth, but in this guy's video it's always within viewing distance."
Looks real, might not be real.

NiciesMan wrote:

Nym wrote:

NiciesMan wrote:Hello.
This's my first post here.

I am indeed a "flat-earth-er", and I found this video by a certain Robert Schwartz, where he claimed to have recorded a 24-hour sun in antarctica (antarctic and arctic time-lapses are his main thing on Vimeo):
(I can't post links yet) "What does the sun do at the Pole !?" by "Robert Schwartz" on Vimeo.

He also has many other similar videos showing things like star trails.

I ask to you folks, who know more than me, how can that work on the flat earth?
Or if it's fake, why would he fake it?

Thanks.

What was your impression of the 24 hour video

That "that doesn't make sense, if the sun is rotating all the way around the earth, but in this guy's video it's always within viewing distance."
Looks real, might not be real.

Did you watch the entire 24 hr video? Why do you feel it's possible that it is fake?

Nym wrote:

NiciesMan wrote:

Nym wrote:

NiciesMan wrote:Hello.
This's my first post here.

I am indeed a "flat-earth-er", and I found this video by a certain Robert Schwartz, where he claimed to have recorded a 24-hour sun in antarctica (antarctic and arctic time-lapses are his main thing on Vimeo):
(I can't post links yet) "What does the sun do at the Pole !?" by "Robert Schwartz" on Vimeo.

He also has many other similar videos showing things like star trails.

I ask to you folks, who know more than me, how can that work on the flat earth?
Or if it's fake, why would he fake it?

Thanks.

What was your impression of the 24 hour video

That "that doesn't make sense, if the sun is rotating all the way around the earth, but in this guy's video it's always within viewing distance."
Looks real, might not be real.

Did you watch the entire 24 hr video? Why do you feel it's possible that it is fake?

Because almost all videos can be faked.

So you (likely) didn't watch the full video, and assume it's possibly faked, then present it here asking how we can explain it with a model

What’s your thoughts on the popular YouTuber mr beast new video in Antarctica supposedly showing a 24hr sun?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IKab3HcfFk&feature=shares

Greenlight144000 wrote:What’s your thoughts on the popular YouTuber mr beast new video in Antarctica supposedly showing a 24hr sun?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IKab3HcfFk&feature=shares

How do you claim 50 hours of daylight and not show time-lapse? Instead we get a ceremonial 'beast camp'? That is not proof of 24hr sun in Antarctica. That is a strawman argument waiting to happen based on he said/she said/they said. Not proof.