ISS Hoax - The International Space Station Does Not Exist!

nowhereelsetogo wrote:OK I think it pays to be open minded. I'm convinced by other simpler things that our world is flat and stationery, space ISS and all of that I have to rely on others.

There's a strong FE thread on David Ickes forums with some very aggressive and relentless opponents.

One of them posted this and I am having difficulty because it looks quite convincing in relation to the time in weightlessness.

Any views please? I had a cursory look for signs of editing but couldn't see anything.



Is it possible that they can recreate the phemomenon just by being at that point (75 - 100km?) where the V2 test and amateur rockets lost all energy suddenly and floated around a bit before falling down again.  

---
Here is a fascinating video -- compare the behavior of Magic Man's black sweater with Astro-not Sunni Williams black sweatshirt.

______

Thanks Oliver, I love it!

I have been awake to the globe lie for some time now thanks to Eric's work. Previous to this, however, I was an advid sky observer. I have tracked the "ISS" using those clever smart phone apps that can tell you exactly when the "ISS" will be above your location.

During my several times observing this (I saw a slow moving bright light through the night sky) I am amazed at the accuracy of the data that some people have regarding this "ISS". We clearly understand its movement through the cosmos.
Doea anyone have any information regarding the history of this "ISS" star that moves through the night sky in a predictable manner?
I dont believe it was man made, so is there any history on the subject of this moving star through the night sky before NASA claimed it as their own?

Zzzap wrote:
I have been awake to the globe lie for some time now thanks to Eric's work. Previous to this, however, I was an advid sky observer. I have tracked the "ISS" using those clever smart phone apps that can tell you exactly when the "ISS" will be above your location.

During my several times observing this (I saw a slow moving bright light through the night sky) I am amazed at the accuracy of the data that some people have regarding this "ISS". We clearly understand its movement through the cosmos.
Doea anyone have any information regarding the history of this "ISS" star that moves through the night sky in a predictable manner?
I dont believe it was man made, so is there any history on the subject of this moving star through the night sky before NASA claimed it as their own?

We’re talking about HABs - High Altititude Balloons. Not much different than your average hot air balloon, but without people. A generic image search for “satellites before takeoff” mostly shows balloons. They generally fly above 50k feet, tho some may fly below 30k feet. Thus avoiding typical jet air travel.... which is 35,000-45,000 feet, usually 41k feet.

So.... they may well actually be man-made. Spy planes and drones fly at 50-80,000 feet. B-52’s at 55,000 feet altitude, etc...

doh! thanks for that answer .
Now that you mentioned HAB- i feel silly i did'nt think about them.
That makes perfect sense, what I noticed most was the intensity of the light compared to the other "twinkles" in the night sky. I immediately thought that this "fast moving star" would have easily been observed by our past civilizations .

Your answer makes complete sense to me.
The light intensity is different because its artifical and has never been in the night sky before it was inflated and sent out.
Any computer program could then be designed to track the HAB.
Thanks for that!

Zzzap wrote:doh! thanks for that answer .
Now that you mentioned HAB- i feel silly i did'nt think about them.
That makes perfect sense, what I noticed most was the intensity of the light compared to the other "twinkles" in the night sky. I immediately thought that this "fast moving star" would have easily been observed by our past civilizations .

Your answer makes complete sense to me.
The light intensity is different because its artifical and has never been in the night sky before it was inflated and sent out.
Any computer program could then be designed to track the HAB.
Thanks for that!

Anytime! Also image searches for “satellites on the ground” almost always show balloons attached.

Furthermore they claim satellites stay in orbit for 20 years or more, powered by solar. However there’s no good method to convert solar to thrust. They’d never be able to maintain an orbit for very long. When you present this fact to globetards they really have no response, as there is none.

In my mind, the satellite hoax is among the easiest to disprove.

What about amateurs who see the ISS with their telescopes??
I met a random guy who showed me a picture he took of the ISS- with his telescope. Did NASA put a piece of junk up into the sky in order to deceive?

This stranger has a photograph we should all trust? Have you taken the photo yourself, or ask to be a witness while the photo is taken?

I know many “experts” who say the exact same thing but cannot replicate the photograph without “Photoshop” .

OK, so the russian space agency just launched a rocket to the ISS with supplies and a ton of nano-sattelites.

I watched a video of the launch on a russian telegram channel. It was funny, they left the film running until the thing was almost horizontal!

And on http://russianspaceweb.com/progress-ms-20.html we get this priceless excuse;

"Following vertical liftoff under the combined thrust of the four RD-107 engines on the first stage and the single RD-108 of the second (core) stage, the launch vehicle headed eastward from Baikonur matching its ground track to an orbit inclined 51.67 degrees to the plane of the Equator. ".

Anyway my main point is that this proves the war is bogus and just another part of the show bringing in the NWO.

The ISS is like the antarctic treaty, people who beat the shit out of each other on any other day will sit down for tea and biscuits for these two.

Hi guys. At my FB account started a "discussion" about satellites and ISS. One friend just posted this video. What do you think about it?

See the following video starting at 58 minutes in: