# Gravity destroyed by a real scientist...

IFERS - Exposing the 'Global' Conspiracy From Atlantis to Zion :: Heliocentricity, Geocentricity, Cosmology and Cosmogeny

Page

**1**of**1**## Gravity destroyed by a real scientist...

We all know that magnets defy gravity when attached to a metal surface...

Let us now enjoy in a example of how a real scientist, Nigel Cheese Hands, destroys a falsehood called "gravity". Please read this post to better understand some properties of a magnet https://ifers.forumotion.com/t477-mount-mera-not-meru-magnetic-mountain-at-the-north-pole-the-meaning-of-the-word-mera-magnet-facts

Short explanation of terms used:

**MSSR**(Minimum Self Seduction Range) - minimum distance at which magnets affect each other with attraction or repulsion.

**MMF**, Magnetic Motive Force - constant motion inside of magnetic body

**Next are paragraphs from Nigel Cheese Hands work titled "A magnet is what"**

Gravity “A force defined as F=mg/ma @ 9.81m/s^2”

How can this be so [?]; If two magnets are placed on top of each other as to form a repulsion, and gravity applies to both. Yet, while the first magnet may be physically in contact with a non-movable surface, the second magnet is NOT.

Utilizing “A” and “B” as the magnetic bodies results in A at 0 = 0 and B at 0 equals something NOT zero. There is a physical gap between the two magnets, and this gap is the interaction of the MSSR of both magnetic bodies.

The question is, if “B” is persistently falling at 9.81m/s^2 but does not move, then the combined force of MSSR (A) and MSSR (B) is equal to 9.81m/s^2; If it was any other number then one of two things would occur, (1) there would be no gap between magnet one and magnet two, and (2) Or “B” would have drifted off into space!

The conditions of two opposing MSSR’s cause a visual and perpetual action that is in direct relation to 9.81m/s^2; but when a THIRD MSSR is introduced “C” the definition of gravity fails itself.

If “A” is stationary or in contact with a fixed body, and “B” is in a perpetual state of implied levitation, then “C” must contradict gravity as “B” is not bound by gravity but by the MSSR of “A”, thus the MSSR of “C” is independent of gravity.

It cannot be suggested that “B” (on one side of the magnet) gravity applies and on the other side of the magnet, it does not; And to add “D”, “E”, “F” and more, where is gravity [?];

As, as more MRRS’s are added the gap between the MSSR’s increases. If all bodies fall to earth at the same velocity then all gaps must be the same! However, it is evidently clear from the image below that the more MRRS’s added the greater the gap,

**thus “gravity” (as defined by “Sir Isaac Newton”) is totally incorrect.**

To clarify, when the “shadow” of the image is viewed the distance between A and B is exactly one of itself, however, the distance between B and C is 1 and 1/5, and between C and D the distance is 1 and 2/5, and so on.

The result is that when two or more MSSR’s are placed into repulsion the composite energy release is equal to 1.962 m/s; thus 5 sets of MSSR’s is equal to 9.81m/s.

The above image also includes the geometric constant below the magnets themselves, and the written explanation to the right, it is also signed and dated by the author and the originator.

The shadow shows the 1.962 m/s increment and the angular disposition is exactly 45 degrees (which validates the angular inclination of the rotational force of the magnetic motive force (as discussed in previous pages). Given the very evident facts of both the MMF and the existence of the MSSR leads to “how to use them together [?]”.

It can be seen that MSSR’s are accumulative, they are bound by the Fibonacci sequence and exert a magnetic motive force or 1.962 above 9.81m/s^2 per MSSR pair. To now extrapolate this obvious condition, it would suggest that if many MRRS’s where to be configured in a unique fashion then the MMF would very soon, overcome the total force of the implied gravity.

**End of quote.**

**M.J.**- Posts : 49

Points : 179

Reputation : 0

Join date : 2024-07-24

Similar topics

» Toward a better theory of “gravity” - Bubbles

» Gravity Does Not Exist!

» Direct Vision, Rationality, Realism and Common Sense.

» Mathematically debunking "gravity" - A critique of Newton’s “laws”

» Flat Earth and Project Blue Beam

» Gravity Does Not Exist!

» Direct Vision, Rationality, Realism and Common Sense.

» Mathematically debunking "gravity" - A critique of Newton’s “laws”

» Flat Earth and Project Blue Beam

IFERS - Exposing the 'Global' Conspiracy From Atlantis to Zion :: Heliocentricity, Geocentricity, Cosmology and Cosmogeny

Page

**1**of**1****Permissions in this forum:**

**cannot**reply to topics in this forum