Precession of the Equinox

comradelevelplane wrote:

EthericData2 wrote:

tycho_brahe wrote:

EthericData2 wrote:Does the geocentric model have equinoxes and ages?

Does anyone know of any videos or links that can explain how the precession of the constellations operate with the geocentric model?

None in the geocentric model. The Pole Star has remained unchanged. No precession or changing of the Pole Star. No precession means no astrological ages.

There must be a precession because the constellations do rotate in the sky while remaining in fixed positions.

I wonder if an astrological age can be determined by the constellation positioning of the heliacal rising and setting of Sirius or something of that nature?

Precession does NOT exist. The sun has always and will always return to it's vernal equinox at the cusp of Aries. Any claim of this modern term "the age of" the zodiacs is FALSE.

this topic has been bugging me a lot. the term precession. their is the precession of the equinox. Hindu astrology worshipped the moons 28 day cycle, and had their rishi divided into 28 of what western astrology would call 'houses'. precession means that the vernal equinox was slowly ascending through the constellations as first observed by the babylonians then the greeks who interpreted it into 12 signs and 12 houses in a 360 degree ascension. which the hindus did, too. it is a fact the vernal equinox occurs at the cusp of aries. meaning the 1st house, aries. it fits the geocentric model, that eventually the equinox will once again enter the constellation aries as first observed by the babylonians or hindus or whichever ancient culture you want to put first. the so called great year. all that heliocentrists back then did was agree that it could be the earths wobble on its axis. you know, theories. however astrology has been used as a calendar and for navigation and even mysticism for thousands of years. supposedly, if understood correctly you can even predict the weather. or if you're one of those elites, you could birth a leader.

comradelevelplane wrote:

EthericData2 wrote:

tycho_brahe wrote:

EthericData2 wrote:Does the geocentric model have equinoxes and ages?

Does anyone know of any videos or links that can explain how the precession of the constellations operate with the geocentric model?

None in the geocentric model. The Pole Star has remained unchanged. No precession or changing of the Pole Star. No precession means no astrological ages.

There must be a precession because the constellations do rotate in the sky while remaining in fixed positions.

I wonder if an astrological age can be determined by the constellation positioning of the heliacal rising and setting of Sirius or something of that nature?

Precession does NOT exist. The sun has always and will always return to it's vernal equinox at the cusp of Aries. Any claim of this modern term "the age of" the zodiacs is FALSE.

I actually mean precession of Polaris does not exist. The North Star, Polaris has been observed as the center as long as we've been alive. Procession of the equinox just means that the vernal equinox (Cusp of Aries), or first the first house Aries, is slowly ascending through the constellations as can be observed and has been since Babylon.