Proof Earth is Not Spinning, Rotating, Revolving or Wobbling

If the Earth truly were a spinning ball orbiting the Sun, there are several tests and experiments which could be, and have been, conducted to prove or disprove the veracity of such a claim.  For example, Danish Astronomer Tycho Brahe famously argued against the heliocentric theory in his time, positing that if the Earth revolved in an orbit round the Sun, the change in relative position of the stars after 6 months of orbital motion could not fail to be seen.  He argued that the stars should seem to separate as we approach and come together as we recede.  In actual fact, however, after almost two hundred million miles of supposed orbit around the Sun, not a single inch of parallax can be detected in the stars!  Desperate heliocentrists, instead of conceding, doubled-down claiming the stars were all actually trillions upon trillions of miles away from us, so incredibly far away that no appreciable parallax could ever be detected!  This convenient explanation, which heliocentrists have clung to for centuries, has proven satisfactory to silence the uninquisitive minds of the masses, but still falls short because even at trillions of miles away, a two hundred million mile change in position WILL create a measurable difference.  The following video explores several more modern proofs that the Earth is not spinning, rotating, revolving, tilting, wobbling, or shooting through infinite space as NASA has brainwashed us to believe.

http://www.AtlanteanConspiracy.com

The Flat-Earth Conspiracy Paperback:
http://www.lulu.com/shop/eric-dubay/the-flat-earth-conspiracy/paperback/product-21889483.html

The Flat-Earth Conspiracy PDF:
http://www.lulu.com/shop/eric-dubay/the-flat-earth-conspiracy/ebook/product-21889577.html

The Flat-Earth Conspiracy EPub:
http://www.lulu.com/shop/eric-dubay/the-flat-earth-conspiracy/ebook/product-21890088.html

A Saudi Arabian cleric has claimed that the Earth does not orbit the sun and is in fact stationary, making the opposite true.

Sheikh Bandar al-Khaibari stunned students at a university in the United Arab Emirates on Sunday by telling them the Earth is “stationary and does not move”, Al Arabiya reported.

A video of the Muslim cleric’s lecture showed him using a cup of water in an attempt to debunk the theory that the world rotates as it orbits the sun.

“Focus with me, this is Earth;” he said, holding the cup.

“If you say that it rotates, if we leave Sharjah airport (in the UAE) on an international flight to China, the earth is rotating, right?

“So if the plane stops still on air, wouldn't China be coming towards it? True or not?”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/saudi-muslim-cleric-claims-the-earth-is-stationary-and-the-sun-rotates-around-it-10053516.html

The fact that a sundial has stood in the same spot telling the correct time everyday for 700 years proves irrefutably that we are fixed and that the sun travels around us on the same path always. This would be impossible if the earth were rotating as they insinuate - Remember TESLA

Sad to see Rory Cooper's channel missing from you tube. He is one of the best at explaining things. Hopefully he will be back, but in the meantime, enjoy!

Admin wrote:

This was really inspiring

Level_Logic wrote:

This was really inspiring[/quote]

Dan Dimension is another pseudo science wannabe, who claims to know atmosSPHEREic properties above the 25 mile limit of man.
Beware of flat Earthers selling Faith in Theory.

High Altitude Balloon Video 32,7 Km - 20.31 Miles (Fisheye lens)

I have a question, and I am hoping someone could answer this.  

If you release a helium balloon inside of a moving plane, would the balloon rise to the ceiling and hover around in the same area, as if you had released it inside of a room, or would the balloon fly to the back of the plane?

EthericData2 wrote:
helium balloon inside of a moving plane
would the balloon rise to the ceiling and hover

In the above video, the Helium Balloon being released over the stationary Earth is only effected by wind currents.  The opposite is true of the Helium Balloon contained within a moving vehicle (Bus, Train, Plane, Car, Spaceball Earth); the Balloon will move in the direction of travel.

I’ve heard the “moving on a train” argument in which ballers claim something like ..” if you jump up in the air while you’re inside of a moving train, you won’t fly to the back of the train” . This argument is invalidated by the fact that if hypothetically you were able to jump up in the air for say 5 seconds or 10 seconds the friction caused by your mass would slow you down regardless of whether you were inside or outside the train.
If you had say a hot air balloon inside of the moving train and you left the surface for 30 seconds would you not begin to move backwards against the direction of the train? There would be nothing propelling you in any direction after you left the surface of the train.

Freepressfreepeople wrote:
I’ve heard ballers claim

The Helium Balloon shows, without doubt that the Earth is stationary, for the Helium Balloon when inside a moving object always 'moves in the direction of travel.'

Flat Earth court case, Plaintiff fails to prove curvature.
Dismissed Without Prejudice

Consult any mainstream science publication or ask any science teacher "why can't we feel the Earth spinning?" and they will unanimously reply that it is because the globe spins at a perfect constant speed, and we can only feel acceleration or deceleration. As CoolCosmos writes: "Earth moves very fast. It spins at a speed of about 1,000 miles per hour and orbits around the Sun at a speed of about 67,000 miles per hour. We do not feel any of this motion because these speeds are constant. You can only feel motion if your speed changes. For example, if you are in a car which is moving at a constant speed on a smooth surface, you will not feel much motion. However, when the car accelerates or when the brakes are applied, you do feel motion." The glaring problem with this claim rarely ever addressed is that the globe and everything on it, if it existed, would be undergoing constant acceleration, because uniform circular motion IS constant acceleration.

As published on physicsclassroom.com, "Uniform circular motion can be described as the motion of an object in a circle at a constant speed. As an object moves in a circle, it is constantly changing its direction. At all instances, the object is moving tangent to the circle. Since the direction of the velocity vector is the same as the direction of the object's motion, the velocity vector is directed tangent to the circle as well. An object moving in a circle is accelerating. An object undergoing uniform circular motion is moving with a constant speed. Nonetheless, it is accelerating due to its change in direction. The direction of the acceleration is inwards. With the inward net force directed perpendicular to the velocity vector, the object is always changing its direction and undergoing an inward acceleration." Therefore the globe's theoretical astronomy is at odds with demonstrable physics. Uniform (and even moreso with non-uniform) circular motion creates a centripetal force which entails constant acceleration in constantly changing directions.

The heliocentric models claims the Earth rotates in uniform circular motion at a constant speed while revolving an elliptical orbit around the Sun at another constant speed, while the entire solar system makes a circular orbit around the Milky Way galaxy at another constant speed, and the Milky Way galaxy shoots off in a straight line from their Big Bang beginning at yet another constant speed. In other words, we are actually supposedly undergoing 4 different circular, elliptical and straight line motions simultaneously, but being told that we quote "do not feel any of this motion because these speeds are constant." They always give the example of a car or train going straight at a constant velocity and claim we cannot feel that motion, but what if the car is speeding along an elevated uniform circular racetrack, while that entire elevated racetrack is making an elliptical circuit around the racing grounds, while simultaneously the entire racing grounds themselves are on a gigantic moving circular foundation, while that foundation itself shoots straight off into the universe? These are the actual variables involved with the globe's supposed constant speed that no one in history has ever demonstrated, measured, felt or experienced whatsoever.

So the next time someone claims you cannot feel the Earth's motion because it spins a constant speed, remind them that uniform circular motion IS acceleration and acceleration IS felt, and when they give you the example of a car driving down a straight road, remind them that the car is actually driving on a circular racetrack, while the racetrack is making an elliptical circuit around the racing grounds, while the entire racing grounds themselves are circling around a larger foundation, and that foundation itself is traveling in a straight line. These 4 simultaneous varying motions the globe is subjected to in the heliocentric model create multiple acceleration vectors and destroy any possibility that they wouldn't be felt or measurable due to traveling at a constant speed.

I think gravity is debunked too by the fact that not only does gravity have to hold on to all earthly objects, but it has to hold on to them with the centripetal force of the earth spinning. I would also add a further conjecture, the centripetal force will be different at different latitudes (depending on the speed of the earth's spin at that point) and so this means gravity has to know exactly how much to reduce/increase its force depending on latitude to keep it roughly the same the world over.

I'm happy for someone to debunk my last point because it's been a few years since I studied any physics!

How does anyone think that Foucault's Pendulum is proof of rotation when the darn thing does not swing or move without a push... and that it eventually comes to a stop (shouldn't the earth's massive force and rotation keep it going?). It would stop even faster if it was half the weight. MOREOVER, if the ball was half the weight, that would mean less force to get it moving... and so, the force of the rotating earth, at 1,000 mph, should have that ball moving on its own no problem. Am I missing something in regard to Foucault's Pendulum???

In regard to water finding a flat surface, if the earth was spinning and 'tilting' toward a curvature, should water in a pool, pond or lake have a slight tilt to it... a bit higher at one end than the other?

I apologize in advance if this topic was covered in the forum. The speed of sound is 761mph, yet the "scientists" claim the earth is spinning at 1,037mph. At the risk of sounding undereducated, would this mean that if you were speaking just west of somebody else they would not be able to hear you because the sound would be too slow?

According to the globe model: Since the earth is not moving at a constant velocity but is actually accelerating, both in its rotation and its orbit, shouldn't the Michelson Morley experiment have picked up on this acceleration? The Sagnac experiment shows a different result, even though both experiments are supposedly undergoing rotational acceleration.

The only conclusion you could make is that the earth is experiencing no acceleration, and therefore is not rotating or orbiting. Globers always imply that earth's movement is "constant velocity" which is simply not true.