Gravity Does Not Exist!

That's indeed what I was looking for, thanks again!

Ignore opening Skype 'conversation'.

the strange thing about the video that lizard king posted is that they all sound like the have bin sucking helium. and how stupid is that experiment, lets drop a bowling ball and some feathers and see which falls faster and call it gravity... ummm last time i checked a bowling ball weighs more than a feather, OF COURSE ITS GONNA FALL FASTER

Actually, that so-called experiment in a vacuum is supposed to prove gravity because even though both objects weigh different amounts, in a vacuum they are said to both fall at the same speed, proving gravity LOL.
Notice the BBC documentary could not even show a full shot of the experiment, instead constantly cutting cameras.

The astronots ALLEGEDLY even took a feather and a hammer to the Moon to prove this theory, although as we all know they never went to the Moon, and the David Copperfield illusion is easy enough to create on Earth, a rigged feather with a metal rod inside, try it yourself.
get a hammer and a feather, find some metal rod, glue the feather to the metal, drop them both and voila, they both land at the same time, just like this bullcrap Moon video

https://youtu.be/KDp1tiUsZw8?t=19

Harry Growler is doing great work on Air pressure and Sophistry busting.

Good post! In diving we use only principles of Archimedes there is no place for gravity. Some times i am joking with students that-  when we go down- i say it is earth gravity pooling us down when we deflating our buoyancy control devices and when we go up it is moon gravity when we inflating our buoyancy control devices, of course from diving theory we all know that it is just buoyancy.  The air has weight, for example when we dive we must calculate buoyancy, it means at we should know how much weight we should have before dive to be neutral buoyant all the time- for example when we dive with 15 ltr. 200 bar.tank we take two extra kg. because in the end of the dive the tank will be almost empty and gonna be positive buoyant up till 4kg.  
Weight of gas:  The gases we use for diving are a combination of the weights of the constituent parts, i.e. the weight per liter.

Air consists of 21% oxygen and 79% nitrogen, which is 0.21 of oxygen and 0.79 of nitrogen:

   The Oxygen part is (0.21 x 1.33grams) = 0.28 grams
   The Nitrogen part is (0.79 x 1.16grams) = 0.92 grams
   Total 1.2g/liter

Running this through for other commonly used gases:

Commonly used diving gases weigh the following per liter (O2/He/N2):

   100% (100/0/0) = 1.33g/l
   80% (80/0/20) = 1.3g/l
   50% (50/0/50) = 1.25g/l
   32% (32/0/68) = 1.22g/l
   28% (28/0/72) = 1.21g/l
   air (21/0/79) = 1.2g/l
   25/20 (25/20/55) = 1g/l
   25/25 (25/25/50) = 0.96g/l
   21/35 (21/35/44) = 0.85g/l
   18/45 (18/45/37) = 0.74g/l
   15/55 (15/55/30) = 0.64g/l

Finding out the weight of gas in a diving cylinder is just a matter of multiplying the weight of gas per liter with the number of liters of gas in the cylinder.

So a 12 liter twin set of air weighs 24 x 232 x 1.2 = 6681.6 grams, or 6.6kg.
A 7 liter stage of 80% weighs 7 x 208 x 1.3 = 1.9kg.

A deep tech dive *might* use the following gas: twin set of 15/55 (3.6kg), ali80s of 21/35 (2kg), 50% (2.9kg) and 100% (3.6kg) would weigh about 12kg

The weight of the air is 1 bar or 1 atmosphere pressure on the surface in the 10 meters deep it is 2 bar pressure, one bar from atmosphere and one bar from 10 meters of water = 2 bar. It means that we live on surface with weight pressure  every day same as 10 meters of water over us . Every next 10 meters of water adds 1 bar extra pressure: in the depth of 20 meters 3 bar, 30 meters 4 bar, 40 meters 5 bar and so on...
After reading and watching this tread you can go easy trough diving theory exam

I would like to propose an off topic discussion regarding the properties of levity and gravity, but not as polar opposites, rather as terminology relating to things that we can't quite explain.

A few philosophers throughout history have spoke of "explaining" vs. "describing" phenomenon. I think that is semantic gibberish. However, let me half ass quote one of these people....."Nothing can be explained, it can only be described." - Friedrich Neitzsche

I would rather not quote anybody, but sometimes that shit is important, especially if their name can only be recited properly by an Asian in a fierce competition at a spelling bee.

We have to admit, shit does fall down. There is no way around this truth. Even before Newton had an apple fall on his head....shit still fell down. This might shock people, but shit falling down wasn't a huge mystery prior to an apple falling on Newton's head. He didn't discover shit falling down...but he observed shit falling down. Newton didn't discover "gravity," but he made it up.

What about levity? I saw a jet take off today, flying upward. I also saw a bird take off into the "ether." Did you guys know the shit that holds this entire universe together is levity? Everything has to do with levity!

ForeverThePhilosopher wrote:

I would like to propose an off topic discussion
regarding the properties of levity and gravity

let me half ass quote - Friedrich Neitzsche

shit is important
shit does fall down
shit still fell down
shit falling down
shit falling down
shit falling down

What about levity?
the shit that holds this entire universe together is levity

There is no Universe, no gaseous cloud formations, no Red shift, no Interstellar mobo jumbo, no Planets, no SUNS, no light years, and no Space Time.

Gravity replaced Abracadabra.

its a mindfuck gravity

first you are convinced there is a ball then there is not so now up and down are not somewhere in space where there is multiple ups and downs in all directions now there is just up and down and wide as we don't know how long it goes on for.

Its also a mindfuck that we got to think that there has to be something in something else like a mind or soul inside a body or a big bang inside something that exploded, see it already doesnt work because what does the big bang explode in and by what?

In my view spirit or soul or mind is something that we pick up on as we breathe into this physical machine that is not contained in the body or head but is constantly flowing through everything not being separate of it but just less dense.

Here is a great article about the truth regarding "gravity". It is written by one of the few globe earthers who I actually follow regularly. He may not be a flat earther yet but he understands the principle of density very well. Enjoy!
https://lovetruthsite.wordpress.com/2017/12/14/gravity/

Joseph Zeo wrote:
the official definition of gravity is wrong

This led me to replace the gravitational force
[with] electromagnetic attraction and electrostatic attraction

a. electric force is interaction between charges
b. electric force can be both attractive and repulsive

a new name and definition
I'll call it flavrity

"Flavrity is the force that attracts heavier things then air straight down towards the mass of the flat earth"

There is NO FORCE pulling on you, there is only density and buoyancy.

Gravity and Flavrity = PRETEND

Nice demonstration.

Could anyone elaborate on Brian Cox's experiment @ Glenn? It was an obvious piece of propaganda as "prof Cox" watches in absolute wonderment as the two objects, of different densities, (bowling ball & feather) drop at the same time, and allegedly fall @ 9.8m s^2....

I think there is another video posted suggesting it was "produced" and there was camera trickery, and edits in the filming. Is there any other way to practically explain this, without saying the film is a fraud? Is density or mass, impacted differently when contained, in a near perfect vacuum? Or is it still something that hasn't explained?

Thoughts anyone? We all know gravity is off the table lol...

I have searched far and wide, to find professions and demonstrations of (g), as the gravitational acceleration or constant, I still come up empty. I have never seen any of the equations given to us, EVER used in a practical manner. (Professions like shipping and freight, depending on where you are, and what location the cargo was loaded from, gravity could impact your "bottom line," when traveling from a location, where gravity is "stronger," to its counterpart). Its such a funny and fickle, magic dust. I now discard all equations, using assumptions and guesses... No more, guessing.

Very interesting. Thanks.

If film makers can fake gravity with their budgets, imagine how easy it is for NASA with their budget:

mitch wrote:

As lame as this may sound; I think the most impactful revelation I've had learning about flat earth is the fact that I'm not moving.

Mass is measured in "kilograms of mass" (kilograms) and weight is measured in "kilograms of force" (kiloponds).
In SI system weight is measured in Newtons, which is 1 kg * 1 m/s²
and for conversion 1 kilogram of force (kilopond) is 9.80665 Newtons
1 kp = 9.80665 N

What is the difference between mass and weight?

.

Buzga wrote:
What is the difference between mass and weight?

Using the theory of Newtonian mechanics (pretend)

Mass (M or m) is the actual amount of material contained in a body and is measured in kg, gm, lb, oz, etc
Mass is the same every where.

Weight (W) is the measure of the amount of force acting on a mass due to the acceleration due to gravity.
Weight is only applicable on Spaceballs, found in the man-made construct of space.

W = m * g

Schpankme wrote:

Buzga wrote:
What is the difference between mass and weight?

Using the theory of Newtonian mechanics (pretend)

Mass (M or m) is the actual amount of material contained in a body and is measured in kg, gm, lb, oz, etc
Mass is the same every where.

Weight (W) is the measure of the amount of force acting on a mass due to the acceleration due to gravity.
Weight is only applicable on Spaceballs, found in the man-made construct of space.

W = m * g

I didn't ask about Newtonian and I don't care.
There they have different weight on pole and different on equator for the same mass.
There 100 kg on Equator weighs 99.7282 kp and on North pole 100.2585 kp, with difference of 530 "grams of force" (ponds).
But thanks anyway.

My question was: What is the difference between mass and weight on Flat Earth?

Buzga wrote:What is the difference between mass and weight on Flat Earth?

There is no Gravity on the stationary flat Earth, there is no force pulling down, there is only falling and rising through density.
Objects seek equilibrium based on the resistance of their surrounding medium.

So, the Mass and Weight of an Object will be one and the same on the flat Earth.

Lets call it the Density of an object.