Re: Mark Sargent Raging Shill Clues

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:45 pm

Posted by thinkforyourself on 05/21/2015

May 17, 2015 20:41:43 GMT flatmatejoe said:
I stumbled across Mark Sargents videos a couple of weeks ago, there is a strong intuitive feeling that something is not right, I have a good sense of what is real or fake and he does not fit the bill of being geniune. Then he started to say that the earth produces its own heat from underneath which I found flagrantly absurd. He also mentioned this guy nammed ccrow77 on you tube that has some of the most ridiculous shill characeristics I have ever seen, I don't think that the moon is a hologram. His assumptions about his dome firmament are not water tight either, it is just complete conjecture. The mockery of doing interviews while fiddling with a globe is clearly a way of subliminarly implanting the globe model in the head of the viewer, while seemingly putting together a flat earth theory. With intuition and a close look at Mark's general conduct, It is sad to say that he is in fact a shill! Also the clear plagiarisation of some Erics work in interviews is evident, even though he said on an interview that he had never read any of Eric Flat Earth Conspiracy book. He has been caught in a complete lie. The idiosyncracies of slurs and "not sure" kind of sounds he grunts in interviews are suspect and the finger is pointing invariably at the geniune shill.

It is good that so many people recognise that Sargent is a Shill fraud. He not only hold a global Earth, he also says repeatedly that there is no evidence for the Flat Earth Theory, and that it is ridiculous.

I think that he might be the worst Shill that I have ever seen. How does he keep his job?

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:47 pm

Posted by starfishprime on 05/21/2015
I also was introduced to the Flat Earth theory through Mark Sargent.

He seems to have almost no knowledge of the historical Flat-Earth theorists or their arguments. He promotes the "roulette wheel" model of the Flat Earth. He said that he had researched essentially every other conspiracy theory, and only looked into the Flat Earth when he ran out of new ones to investigate, and yet I do not think I have heard him mention a single conspiracy outside of the Apollo moon hoax, and even that only indirectly through film references. Nor does he have any interest in discussing the conspiratorial aspects of the globe Earth model, such as NASA's stagecraft or freemasonry. He speaks about the Earth theoretically as if it was designed by a deceptive force which is itself trying to trick humans into believing the heliocentric globe model (he refers to it creating celestial objects that "appear" to be globes, and sending meteorites down so we will think they came from space).

So glad I discovered Eric's work soon afterwards!

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:47 pm

Posted by on 05/21/2015
Mark (of the beast) Sargent now has a load of fear porn survivalist you tube videos. He's morphing into Alex Jones IMHO

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:48 pm

Posted by Douglas Sea on 05/22/2015
www.coasttocoastam.com/

Tonight's Show
Enclosed Earth Theory
Thursday - May 21, 2015

Professional game tester and proprietary software trainer Mark K. Sargent will discuss his breakthrough work on the Enclosed Earth Theory. He'll outline the visible physical clues that point to the idea that Earth is actually a "Truman Show" type contained system stretching thousands of miles wide. He'll also share data from Admiral Byrd's expeditions which reveal evidence that Byrd discovered a hollow Earth which is actually a giant dome-like structure.

the posting comes with a nasa rendition of the toy mason ball globe

"his breakthrough work" really georgie??
how about the idea that listening to professional liar porn puts one in a "Truman Show" type contained system stretching thousands of miles wide??

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:49 pm

Posted by Douglas Sea on 05/22/2015

Professional game tester and proprietary software trainer Mark K. Sargent
what better story could you come up with to bring out a shill with a manufactured past?

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:50 pm

Posted by ziming on 05/24/2015
I don't believe it's a coincidence that Sargent's website got completed within days of his big coast to coast interview with George Snoory. All likely planned because coast to coast has a large audience of listeners which he would want to direct to his new website afterwards.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:51 pm

Posted by flatmate on 05/24/2015
I may be new to FE but I can sniff out a rat when I see one. My first exposure was through Math's stand-up video. It piqued my curiosity enough to explore further -but after having flown in both directions over the spinning ball, I thought, how could this be real -this isn't Pac-Man where you disappear off one screen (Mercator) and reappear on the other. It wasn't until I saw Eric's description of the azimuthal projection and how I could fly to Thailand from Vancouver and still be pointed East the whole time -even as we did the ridiculous curl around the Alaskan panhandle did I realize that my biggest objection had been thoroughly crushed.

Never once did it enter my mind that a bunch of "Builder's" constructed the entire planet -put molten lava in the ground -made artificial salt water oceans and celestial projections to 'throw us off their scent'. Yet, Sgt Disinfo subtly introduces all these concepts into the FE model, and when asked what got him interested in this subject. "Boredom". Gimme a break. That's your best answer? I'm juggling about fifty different streams of deception across every subject and discipline -which is not unlike most modern researchers "truthseekers". Boredom is not in my vocabulary. I resisted this topic like the plague. Seems he is trying to reinforce the typical stereotype of the basement conspiracy theorist that imagines secretive plots to help absorb all those hours of free time.

He has tons of ultra-slick videos that erupt from nowhere -has time to do interviews with complete nobody's (is that his Mom interviewing him from the top floor of the same home?). Yet, he can only communicate with the legitimate Flat Earth group through a Proxy. So he invests massive amounts of time producing these videos and now disappears into oblivion -If he truly wanted to proselytize this idea, he would be defending himself furiously and maybe setting up reconciliation skype call with Eric to defend his wacky ideas and prove his authenticity.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:55 pm

Posted by Admin on 06/25/2015

I just suffered through Mark's latest video where he was asked some tough questions in the second hour and his terrible waffling roundabout answers left the interviewers speechless on several occasions: "The Moon is a 3 dimensional object! Eric says it's 2D (no... I don't) Go see Crow777's channel! I prefer Crow's model to Eric's! I always talk about the "enclosed system" and my website is "EnclosedEarth.com" but if you ask me straight-out for evidence of this, I don't actually have any, and I will claim it's still a mystery, even though in every other interview I state as fact that Admiral Byrd found a barrier/dome. Gravity is not just density, it's "molecular magnetism" and has the ability to curve the water as seen in my favorite Orlando Ferguson Concave Earth map! Yeah, I know it's a concave Earth map and I'm supposed to be a flat Earther, but I like the model better from a game design standpoint. What can I say, I don't care about reality or science like Eric and normal people, because I used to design video games, so all I care about is how I personally would design Earth if it were my video game. And as for people calling me a shill, well I must be really bad at it because I will die before I change my mind." What? His explanations are terrible and he absolutely muddies the waters and poisons the well and does a great job of it. He is their "Mark Sargent," the shill captain, marked by his Jew hat, pyramids and ball toy. I have cataloged more of his ridiculous shillyness and lies here.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:57 pm

Posted by bemoody on 06/26/2015
Some things I noticed:

"I'm warning people now. You don't want to do it." He warns people and the tells them not to research FE? Because it will rock their world too much. Isn't that the whole point; making people question their preconceived notions and convincing them to not take for granted everything they've been told absent evidence? wtf.

"The only people who have a shot (at debunking FE) is Nasa…" Wrong. If he's not controlled opposition, why is he trying to take the power away from the individual, and placing authority back into the hands of NASA- whom everyone everyone everyone who's ever looked into, knows lies... about everything they say. wtf.

"Not to go down the prison road…" "I don't want to call it a prison…" This is a NLP tactic that I notice he uses frequently. He'll plant an idea in the head of the listener by saying "Now, I don't want to say (whatever stupid bullshit he apparently doesn't want to say)..." then goes on to make the exact 'point' that he doesn't want to make. wtf.

"You can't be the authority if you're not the highest power" What does this even mean, Sargeant of the Marks?

"Bigger stuff (than scientific evidence)…" He's focused on the bigger stuff than science. You know, stuff that can't be proven impirically or otherwise. That's what constitutes as 'bigger stuff'... smh. wtf.

"(in regards to water flowing downhill) Because it happens naturally a lot of people want to go with that…" Actually LOLing this time. wtf. Many people choose to go with what's observable through experience, but the Sergeant of the Marks doesn't fall for that. wtf.

"Do we have technology to put people in a space station? Yes, we do." Smh. This is shameful. So many contradictory statements.

"The hubcap model, notice I didn't say roulette table" Once again saying 'I'm not gonna say' or 'I didn't say' or 'I don't want to call it" while saying that exact thing. So disingenuous.

These are just a few examples. It's really, really hard to listen to this guy. He sounds like a stupid yet somehow arrogant Tim Robbins. Like his other interviews, this one is laden with stupid bullshit that would for sure detract new-comers, just based on the conflicting 'info' he provides. Really frustrating. Jeran's involvement with this guy either makes him a silly mark too, or a shilly shark. Smh. I do appreciate that the interviewer asks legitimate questions, even persisting for actual answers after his initial questions are brushed off.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:57 pm

Posted by lizardking on 06/26/2015

Jun 25, 2015 13:55:18 GMT gnosticwarrior said:
Also, I seemed to have missed the boat on this Crow777 guy - but I keep seeing his name everywhere. What exactly was his deal? I see other YouTubers saying "GO SEE CROW777 FOR MORE ON X, Y, and Z", but everything they suggested just "felt" wrong, without really needing much more investigation. From what I'm reading here, my intuition was correct. I'm just curious what his deal was/is?

He tries to convince people that the Moon is a hologram.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:58 pm

Posted by Admin on 06/26/2015

Jun 25, 2015 14:33:21 GMT bemoody said:
[
"I'm warning people now. You don't want to do it." He warns people and the tells them not to research FE? Because it will rock their world too much. Isn't that the whole point; making people question their preconceived notions and convincing them to not take for granted everything they've been told absent evidence? wtf.

"The only people who have a shot (at debunking FE) is Nasa…" Wrong. If he's not controlled opposition, why is he trying to take the power away from the individual, and placing authority back into the hands of NASA- whom everyone everyone everyone who's ever looked into, knows lies... about everything they say. wtf.

"Not to go down the prison road…" "I don't want to call it a prison…" This is a NLP tactic that I notice he uses frequently. He'll plant an idea in the head of the listener by saying "Now, I don't want to say (whatever stupid bullshit he apparently doesn't want to say)..." then goes on to make the exact 'point' that he doesn't want to make. wtf.

"You can't be the authority if you're not the highest power" What does this even mean, Sargeant of the Marks?

"Bigger stuff (than scientific evidence)…" He's focused on the bigger stuff than science. You know, stuff that can't be proven impirically or otherwise. That's what constitutes as 'bigger stuff'... smh. wtf.

"(in regards to water flowing downhill) Because it happens naturally a lot of people want to go with that…" Actually LOLing this time. wtf. Many people choose to go with what's observable through experience, but the Sergeant of the Marks doesn't fall for that. wtf.

"Do we have technology to put people in a space station? Yes, we do." Smh. This is shameful. So many contradictory statements.

"The hubcap model, notice I didn't say roulette table" Once again saying 'I'm not gonna say' or 'I didn't say' or 'I don't want to call it" while saying that exact thing. So disingenuous.

These are just a few examples. It's really, really hard to listen to this guy. He sounds like a stupid yet somehow arrogant Tim Robbins. Like his other interviews, this one is laden with stupid bullshit that would for sure detract new-comers, just based on the conflicting 'info' he provides. Really frustrating. Jeran's involvement with this guy either makes him a silly mark too, or a shilly shark. Smh. I do appreciate that the interviewer asks legitimate questions, even persisting for actual answers after his initial questions are brushed off.

Awesome analysis Bemoody! You're spot-on that his "ignorant arrogance laden with stupid bullshit" and lack of scientific proofs/evidence turns neophytes completely off from ever listening to the subject again. Conjecturing endlessly about "how it could be" and "how he would do it from a game design stand point" and always comparing it to the Truman Show while playing with his toy ball Earth makes the whole thing sound fictional to any noob tuning in for the first time.

"Do we have technology to put people in a space station? Yes, we do." WTF? And this is just after he told people to watch the ISS Hoax video. These are the kind of blatant contradictions that make him a shill and make neophytes think the whole subject is bogus like this guy.

"In regards to water flowing downhill, because it happens naturally a lot of people want to go with that!" LOLing with you Bemoody. Yeah, a lot of people go with what ACTUALLY happens but I like to pretend life is a video game and I can make water do whatever I want with my magic molecular magnetism!

Also, am I the only one that hates Mark and Jeran's favorite catch phrase "Treat others BETTER than you treat yourself?" Umm, no. Definitely treat yourself best. Unless you want to be some beta-ass vicky-victim woe-as-me drama-queen, you're definitely going to do what's right and best for you. Can you imagine someone actually trying to follow Mark/Jeran's "wisdom" here? I'd have to feed someone a better 3 meals every day, dress them better than me, find them a better job than me, find them a better partner, better friends, give them all the emotional support they need without them reciprocating, always listen to their troubles but never bore them with mine. If I actually tried to follow this advice I would become the complete slave of the first person I met. I'd end up feeding, clothing, working for, cleaning for and becoming a servant to them and unable to treat myself how I deserve to be treated or to even attempt to treat 2 others or 3 others "better" than I treat myself. I think the Golden Rule was just fine as "Treat others as you would like to be treated," before Mark/Jeran "improved" upon it with "Treat others BETTER than you treat yourself."

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:58 pm

Posted by lizardking on 06/26/2015

Jun 25, 2015 15:49:01 GMT Admin said:
Also, am I the only one that hates Mark and Jeran's favorite catch phrase "Treat others BETTER than you treat yourself?" Umm, no. Definitely treat yourself best. Unless you want to be some beta-ass vicky-victim woe-as-me drama-queen, you're definitely going to do what's right and best for you. Can you imagine someone actually trying to follow Mark/Jeran's "wisdom" here? I'd have to feed someone a better 3 meals every day, dress them better than me, find them a better job than me, find them a better partner, better friends, give them all the emotional support they need without them reciprocating, always listen to their troubles but never bore them with mine. If I actually tried to follow this advice I would become the complete slave of the first person I met. I'd end up feeding, clothing, working for, cleaning for and becoming a servant to them and unable to treat myself how I deserve to be treated or to even attempt to treat 2 others or 3 others "better" than I treat myself. I think the Golden Rule was just fine as "Treat others as you would like to be treated," before Mark/Jeran "improved" upon it with "Treat others BETTER than you treat yourself."

So they are basically describing how they want us to treat them, better than ourselves.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:00 pm

Posted by on 07/06/2015
Latest Curve Ball

Mark was asked a question on the radio interview what the other side of the earth looks like. He speculated that it could be an inversion of what it is here; that there could be people living there with gravity operating by a different set of rules. What BULL!

First, no one knows what the other side of the earth looks like. Mark admittedly speculated but to say that people live there with gravity holding them down is complete non-sense. As a side note, after he said this, the host of the program, who seems to know a bit of the flat earth, didn't call him on that one.

To speculate is one thing but at least make it with some logic. Sargent is wrong on several issues on saying that people “could be living on the other side.” This should never come from someone who knows about the flat earth. Here are my reasons why this statement is stupid.

1 – There is NO such thing as gravity (it's just the weight of an object that holds everything down.)

2 – There are NO "other set of rules"

3 – People, all lose objects and water will fall off

Sargent knows that water can't be held in any shape; that water seeks its own level. So, why say that water can be under us ( implying: on land facing in the other direction) and not fall off into space?

Then, about 1 minute later he said, said, quoting and apparently agreeing that, “the earth is shaped like a roulette wheel.”

Where's the Shill Button?

This is nonsense for those who know about the flat earth. I've seen this drawing of the shape he is talking about. The shape is like where the North Pole is and the most northern countries are on a slope. The further south you go until about midway it curves up and levels right before you hit the Antarctic (the best way I can describe it in words). Now, we all know that water can't hold on to the side of a hill, and there would still be problems with flying in planes, building construction, etc.

Sargent does not believe that the earth is like a coin – his model of the world is the roulette wheel! WRONG! The earth is more or less like a coin (with valleys, hills and mountains).

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:01 pm

Posted by flatlander on 07/11/2015
I met Mark Sargent the other day. I flew to Denver, drove to Boulder, and I had pizza with Mark. There is a picture I took of him and his car after we had pizza below.

The first thing I asked him was "so are you a shill?" and he looked me in the eyes and said "no" so I'm inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt for now, especially since nobody else has even bothered to meet him in person. I'd love to meet Matt and Eric as well, and will happily fly to them blindfolded at their acceptance. I'll buy pizza, and if there's vegan pizza in Thailand I'm down for that, Eric. (vegetarian my entire life. considering trying vegan..)

Anyhow, I talked with Mark about doing some more polished production of content which will include experiments that hopefully guys like Eric and Matt can participate in, as a distributed effort, produced in a decentralized way, and in full view of everyone in the world who may care about the topic of this board, and would like to see 3rd party verified experiments that are executed correctly.

For now I am prepared to provide $10,000 for experiments that are recorded and documented following a set of guidelines that are as of yet undefined. Perhaps this board can help to define and describe exactly what experiments should be done, and what protocols need to be followed.

Additionally, I reached out to Eric via PM, and I wanted to say hello to anyone who cares about the science of all of this. I want to deal with people who are legitimate that are willing to follow experiment guidelines, meet simple milestones, and provide the filmed and documented repeatable data through a standard format (description, video of experiment, chain of authority, etc) and a creative commons or similar.

I would prefer if all of the main flat earth guys would engage in these experiments independent of one another, and I want to pull the trigger quickly. Maybe they're ALL shills, but if an experiment is conducted correctly, it doesn't matter.

So, who's up for some experiments?

PM me or reply here! Thanks.

Mark Sargent Raging Shill Clues - Page 2 BAeWjMT

Mark Sargent Raging Shill Clues - Page 2 BAeWjMT

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:02 pm

Posted by Admin on 07/11/2015
Hey Flatlander, cool picture. I'm glad to hear you're so game to help do some experimentation and I certainly support you there. However, you claim that you "want to deal with people who are legitimate," yet the first person you reach out to and meet is top-shill Mark Sargent! So the first thing you do is ask this liar, "are you a shill?" He lies and says, "no." And somehow that's enough for you!? (Even though in your PM you said, "He was nice enough, but I do have to admit that my gut was whispering that he felt like a bit of an artifice & construct, which was solidified when I saw his car") Before enlisting Matt/Mark for your experiments I suggest you read and re-read the evidence I've collected here that they are not trust-worthy or genuine:ifers.boards.net/thread/573/flat-earth-shill-wall-shame Peace

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:02 pm

Posted by csp on 07/11/2015

Jul 11, 2015 3:58:52 GMT flatlander said:

I'm not particularly interested in politics, but I am interested in working together even with shills, given that I have enough control to keep logical fallacies and biased narratives from influencing the outcomes of experiments, or the explanation or impact of what they show. In other words, I don't care who is or is not a shill, so long as I can reliably complete a task (like an experiment with trusted 3rd parties present & video).

Sorry, but that's exactly what you don't want to do.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:03 pm

Posted by thinkforyourself on 07/12/2015
Breaking news! Mark Sargent has been seen getting ready to go scuba diving:

Mark Sargent Raging Shill Clues - Page 2 1341609997-capcontestmelons

Mark Sargent Raging Shill Clues - Page 2 1341609997-capcontestmelons

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:06 pm

Posted by Jimmy on 07/15/2015
flatlander ,

Sargent lives in Boulder? That's the most expensive area in Colorado. Dude must be banking. Asking Sargent if he is a shill is similar to asking a major politician if they are paid off. Of course they will lie. After telling the same lie over and over, even a chronic liar starts believing their own lies. These people can bold face lie to you and not even flinch.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:07 pm

Posted by sargentsucks on 08/24/2015
On Mark's show Saturday, right before the last break if you're interested in looking it up, he says that if you don't ridicule and laugh at the flat earth then something is wrong with you because it's the craziest....then he stops like maybe he realizes he's taking it too far. I'm getting nauseous listening to his show but I feel the need to mine these little "shit gems" for everyone to know what a great guy he is.

To be perfectly clear he was saying it in the context of someone hearing it for the first time. However a lot of us even though we need to run the gauntlet of our own indoctrinated ideas, we still "get it" the first time we hear it, so to say something is wrong with you for not laughing and ridiculing is to make a mockery of the movement you mean to hijack :-)

For anyone still on the fence about wether this guy is a shill or not, he claims to have to spent months researching the FE and not to have come across Eric's work! I'm sorry but I have to say it simply, he....is....a.....liar, because that is just not possible if you use Youtube, in which he says he digested everything he could, what else do we need.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:08 pm

Posted by okayako on 08/24/2015

May 21, 2015 16:32:47 GMT Douglas Sea said:
Professional game tester and proprietary software trainer Mark K. Sargent will discuss his breakthrough work on the Enclosed Earth Theory. He'll outline the visible physical clues that point to the idea that Earth is actually a "Truman Show" type contained system stretching thousands of miles wide. He'll also share data from Admiral Byrd's expeditions which reveal evidence that Byrd discovered a hollow Earth which is actually a giant dome-like structure.

I came across his work early on my search, and this was the point that turned me away--the idea that the entire system might be manufactured--not natural, organic-- and the molten lava/volcanoes might be made using huge underground furnaces, etc. Whatever system we are living in, it is clearly naturally designed, not artificial! I'm always open minded to hear new ideas, but there is so much crap always coming out that needs to be filtered. Mark Sargent's ideas are just crap, and deliberate crap at that. His job is to convince you in the beginning, but then completely lose you by giving his outlandish theories. You'll feel silly for even entertaining the idea of a flat earth, then move about your merry way to the next big interesting theory. I'm glad there are other flat earthers out there who seem to be sincere!

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:10 pm

Posted by Jimmy on 08/25/2015
sargentsucks,

Thanks for taking one for the team and viewing Mark Sargent's material for the rest of us. Lord knows I haven't watched a single video from him and never intended to after reading through this thread.

As for shill Sargent calling Eric anti-Semitic, you can't be anti-Semitic if what you are saying about Jews is truth.

I was following Eric's channel and website for a couple of years when I first learned about FE back in November/December 2014 and I never once laughed or ridiculed the presented research as Sargent claims a newbie should. I was particularly shocked, but continued to learn more until I was totally convinced. I couldn't wait for the next flat earth video to pop up on my YouTube feed. Those were some interesting winter months, no doubt about that.

Mark Sargent Raging Shill Clues - Page 2 Rofl

Like many others on this board, I have an open mind and have been looking into conspiracy facts and theories for several years, so flat earth just clicked for me. If someone just came onto their first conspiracy video ever and it's a flat earth video from Shill Sargent, then I could see where they might ridicule it and laugh it off. I think that is one of the main purposes of Sargent and other shills like him.

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:12 pm

Posted by wiseblood on 08/25/2015
Why do we even use this idiotic construct - 'anti-semitic'? When you break it down, it means nothing, it certainly doesn't mean anti-jewish! Most likely it was invented for the purpose of leading clueless goyim down the holohoax path...

I think we should insist on using 'anti-zionist' (or simply label the particular flavour of base tribal, antisocial, anti-human, psychopathic type of behaviour Jews/Zionists/Sabbath goy indulge in).It's fallacious term which only poisons the well, and zionists love it. Not sure if even putting in quotes is enough..

Anyway, Sargent is minted by his own account, IIRC, he said so himself in an interview a while back that he dabbled in real estate, pre 2008 crash, and is now living off what he made then.. Which is probably his way of saying how he's on some shill type payroll...

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:13 pm

Posted by icedrink58 on 09/01/2015

Flat Earth Clues Part 12 - Real Eyes

Sargent Clueless has put out a new "clue".
You cannot believe your eyes!!!! Wow.....so because optical illusions exist, then of course EVERYTHING we observe might be an illusion and we never can be sure of anything. Wow.
So...forget all the scientific experiments we can do to prove the earth is flat.....all irrellevant....because our senses could betray us. And do our senses even make sense (ha, great question, right?) from a game design standpoint??? I don't know, but.....nah....whatever....
Thank you Mark Sargent for this great enlightenment! Now i can finally go out into the world and convince everybody that the earth is flat....because....ehm.....look at this paper dragon...it...ehm....it doesn't really follow you with its eyes...so....ehm...how can you think the earth is a ball?
All the evidence i need. What would the FE community be without such great thinkers who are able to connect a guy in a bear costume with the question if the earth is flat or a spinning ball?
Thank you so much oh great Marky Mark!!

Muhahahaha

Mark Sargent Raging Shill Clues - Page 2 Wink

by Thinkforyourself Fri Jan 29, 2016 8:15 pm

Posted by mitch on 09/05/2015
When the consensus slang definition of "hot potato" is "a controversial issue or situation which is awkward to deal with" it calls into question (when conflated like this) the integrity of naming a YT channel "Flat Earth & Other Hot Potatoes" in the respect of irrefutable FE truth. I saw mention in the comments she intended to interview Eric at some point, is this going to happen?

by **Admin** Sat Mar 12, 2016 6:16 am

Mark is now starting a daily radio show with a paid subscription service and has apparently written a book for sale. Ratings and comments disabled from the video though... must be too many dislikes and negative comments from informed flat-Earthers "clued" in to his shillyness.

by Sponsored content