Retrograde Motion
4 posters
Page 1 of 1
Retrograde Motion
by Thinkforyourself Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:34 pm
Posted by Admin on 04/27/2015
The retrograde motion of the wandering stars in most Geocentric models is a result of their spirographic pattern revolving around a revolving object (the Sun). The "retrograde" part of their motion is the outer-part of the "flower-petal" motion they make as shown starting around 6:20 here:
Or as Rowbotham wrote, it could be as simple as the planet only seeming to reverse direction because it is traveling in a circle above and so if visible the whole time would appear to "retrograde" as it comes back around the further part of its circular orbit:
"The planets are sometimes seen to move from east to west, sometimes from west to east, and sometimes to appear stationary, and it is contended that 'the hypothesis of the earth's motion is the natural and easy explanation; and that it would be in vain to seek it from any other system.' To those who have adopted the Newtonian theory the above language is quite natural; but when the very foundation of that system is proved to be erroneous, we must seek for the cause as it really exists in the heavens, regardless of every hypothesis and consequence. Careful observation has shown that the advance, apparent rest, and retrogradation of a planet is a simple mechanical result. All the orbits are above the earth; and whenever a spectator stands in such a position that a planet is moving from right to left, he has only to wait until it reaches the end or part of its orbit nearest to him, when, as it turns to traverse the other side of the orbit, it will, for a time, pass in a direction to which the line of sight is a tangent. A good illustration will be found in an elliptical or circular race-course. A person standing at some distance outside the course would see the horses come in from the right, and pass before him to the left; but on arriving at the extreme arc they would for a time pass in the direction of, or parallel to, his line of sight, and would, therefore, appear for a time not to progress, but on entering the other side of the course would appear to the spectator to move from. left to right, or in a contrary direction to that in which they first passed before him. The following diagram, fig. 99, will illustrate this. Let S be the place of the spectator. It is evident that a body passing from A to P, would pass him from right to left; but during its passage from P to T it would seem not to move across the field of view. On arriving, however, at T, and passing on to B, it would be seen moving from left to right; but from B to A it would again appear to be almost stationary." -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, "Earth Not a Globe!" (323)
The retrograde motion of the wandering stars in most Geocentric models is a result of their spirographic pattern revolving around a revolving object (the Sun). The "retrograde" part of their motion is the outer-part of the "flower-petal" motion they make as shown starting around 6:20 here:
Or as Rowbotham wrote, it could be as simple as the planet only seeming to reverse direction because it is traveling in a circle above and so if visible the whole time would appear to "retrograde" as it comes back around the further part of its circular orbit:
"The planets are sometimes seen to move from east to west, sometimes from west to east, and sometimes to appear stationary, and it is contended that 'the hypothesis of the earth's motion is the natural and easy explanation; and that it would be in vain to seek it from any other system.' To those who have adopted the Newtonian theory the above language is quite natural; but when the very foundation of that system is proved to be erroneous, we must seek for the cause as it really exists in the heavens, regardless of every hypothesis and consequence. Careful observation has shown that the advance, apparent rest, and retrogradation of a planet is a simple mechanical result. All the orbits are above the earth; and whenever a spectator stands in such a position that a planet is moving from right to left, he has only to wait until it reaches the end or part of its orbit nearest to him, when, as it turns to traverse the other side of the orbit, it will, for a time, pass in a direction to which the line of sight is a tangent. A good illustration will be found in an elliptical or circular race-course. A person standing at some distance outside the course would see the horses come in from the right, and pass before him to the left; but on arriving at the extreme arc they would for a time pass in the direction of, or parallel to, his line of sight, and would, therefore, appear for a time not to progress, but on entering the other side of the course would appear to the spectator to move from. left to right, or in a contrary direction to that in which they first passed before him. The following diagram, fig. 99, will illustrate this. Let S be the place of the spectator. It is evident that a body passing from A to P, would pass him from right to left; but during its passage from P to T it would seem not to move across the field of view. On arriving, however, at T, and passing on to B, it would be seen moving from left to right; but from B to A it would again appear to be almost stationary." -Dr. Samuel Rowbotham, "Earth Not a Globe!" (323)
_________________
All about Shillaphobia
Shun the non-believers!
'Flat Earth Diva'
Supposed 'temper temper beanpole', 'snidy weasel' and 'clueless, cloying, sychophant.'
Apparently 'dangerous person'
Thinkforyourself- Admin
- Posts : 2048
Points : 8360
Reputation : 2862
Join date : 2015-12-30
Age : 36
Location : United Kingdom
comradelevelplane likes this post
Re: Retrograde Motion
by Schpankme Tue Jul 04, 2017 10:35 am
This video represents the Sun, Moon and 7 said Planets for two 28 day Lunar Cycles, and is accurate to within 10° of arc during the first few frames for January 14, 2016. But is not an accurate representation of time. NOT TO SCALE. This 3D model is not meant to be an entire cosmological model. ~ Alternative Cosmology
Schpankme- Posts : 1202
Points : 6097
Reputation : 1606
Join date : 2015-12-30
Re: Retrograde Motion
by JohannJohann Thu May 31, 2018 12:25 am
Ptolemy's model of the universe explains retrograde and the planets over a period form the flower of life
JohannJohann- Posts : 10
Points : 2537
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2018-01-10
Re: Retrograde Motion
by JohannJohann Thu Aug 09, 2018 7:52 pm
Fascinating documentary about the Myriad Clock, i cant help but to think about the similarities between the clock and our Earth clock. Im thinking Green house + Self-sustaining ecosystem + living critters = Our physical reality.
Ive never taken DMT or similar substances but from what ive read i think that is the Spiritual reality. I think we might find all the answers in our 3rd eye
Ive never taken DMT or similar substances but from what ive read i think that is the Spiritual reality. I think we might find all the answers in our 3rd eye
JohannJohann- Posts : 10
Points : 2537
Reputation : 1
Join date : 2018-01-10
Re: Retrograde Motion
by Jack Aurora Mon Sep 13, 2021 6:56 pm
In the Divine poimander of Hermes Trismegistus, he speaks of the motion of the wandering stars moving in contradiction to the fixed stars...it goes in depth in the dark sayings about the duality involved in motion and that which moves and that which doesn't move cause the seven spheres to become moved... The works of Hermes Trismegistus holds a lot of encoded messages regarding creation, and it's formation and shape, and it's functions... There is an unseen, third body in the heavens that has some influence over the Sun and Moon...
Also in the Toh and TohRah it speaks of Adonai...the programmer(s) of the DNA matrix. aDoNAi lives on or inside the moon, just above earth, and the moon is only big enough for aDoNAi to occupy...
Am I understanding this correctly?
Please correct if I'm mistaken...
Also in the Toh and TohRah it speaks of Adonai...the programmer(s) of the DNA matrix. aDoNAi lives on or inside the moon, just above earth, and the moon is only big enough for aDoNAi to occupy...
Am I understanding this correctly?
Please correct if I'm mistaken...
Jack Aurora- Posts : 29
Points : 1272
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2021-07-20
Location : Cape Town, South Africa
Similar topicsPage 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum