Chemtrails, Geo-engineering And HAARP

markwilson wrote:
My physical evidence is the clouds

When do Contrails hit the ground?
When do Chemtrails hit the ground?


What precautions do you take to not inhale Contrails?
What precautions do you take to not inhale Chemtrails?


Where is your photos of Contrails laying across the ground?
Where is your photos of Chemtrails laying across the ground?


How do Contrails effect plant life?
How do Chemtrails effect plant life?

Schpankme wrote:

markwilson wrote:
My physical evidence is the clouds

When do Contrails hit the ground?
When do Chemtrails hit the ground?


What precautions do you take to not inhale Contrails?
What precautions do you take to not inhale Chemtrails?


Where is your photos of Contrails laying across the ground?
Where is your photos of Chemtrails laying across the ground?


How do Contrails effect plant life?
How do Chemtrails effect plant life?

Have you had the opportunity to watch the documentary I shared? And do you agree that contrails (water) evaporate, particulate matter doesn't? If not chemicals now present, forming manmade clouds, why was I deprived of chemical clouds growing up? What precautions do you take against the harmful effects of fluoride? Does your municipality poison your water? Are you drinking it? Or do you, like me, drink only distilled water, unless I'm out of the house and have no other choice (and even then we usually take our own travel mug so we have the distilled water)?

Why must I answer why water (contrails evaporating) does anything other than what all water does when evaporating? But since chemtrails do not evaporate timely behind the delivery aircraft, as they did when I was growing up, I understand that they are not contrails.

Is our enemy the State, absolved from any suspicion in this matter since I bring you personal testimony of a time when the skies were not filled with obvious manmade clouds in the aftermath of aircraft flying over belching out something other than contrails?

Why do you suppose JooTube has place the "information panel providing context" under that video, with a link to an Encyclopedia Britannica article, "Contrails"? Apparently, JooTube feels compelled to do that which controlled disinformation does. Why has JooTube in essence edited the man's channel with their unwelcome interference of content not invited, nor welcomed, since the producer of the video obviously knows what I do; contrails are not to be confused with chemtrails. One is natural (what I witnessed as a young man), one is not (what I witness now).

Finally, I'd like to know how you hard-linked 16% agricultural increase to chemtrails in your previous comment to Real World. What proof do you have of that cause-and-effect?

markwilson wrote:
Why must I answer

When do Contrails hit the ground? NEVER
When do Chemtrails hit the ground? NEVER


What precautions do you take to not inhale Contrails? NONE
What precautions do you take to not inhale Chemtrails? NONE


Where is your photos of Contrails laying across the ground? NONE
Where is your photos of Chemtrails laying across the ground? NONE


How do Contrails effect plant life? NEVER
How do Chemtrails effect plant life? NEVER

Schpankme wrote:

markwilson wrote:
Why must I answer

When do Contrails hit the ground? NEVER
When do Chemtrails hit the ground? NEVER

What precautions do you take to not inhale Contrails? NONE
What precautions do you take to not inhale Chemtrails? NONE

Where is your photos of Contrails laying across the ground? NONE
Where is your photos of Chemtrails laying across the ground? NONE

How do Contrails effect plant life? NEVER
How do Chemtrails effect plant life?  NEVER

That's it? No substantive response to my points?!

You commented to Real World above with, "Can you tell us about, "spraying poison from the sky" and how this effects animal life, and at the same time increases California Agriculture production by 16 % yearly?"

I'll ask again; where did you get your information that "at the same time" chemtrails are being sprayed, agricultural production is up "by 16% yearly" in direct association with that spraying?

markwilson wrote:

When do Contrails hit the ground? NEVER
When do Chemtrails hit the ground? NEVER

What precautions do you take to not inhale Contrails? NONE
What precautions do you take to not inhale Chemtrails? NONE

Where is your photos of Contrails laying across the ground? NONE
Where is your photos of Chemtrails laying across the ground? NONE

How do Contrails effect plant life? NEVER
How do Chemtrails effect plant life?  NEVER

That's it? No substantive response to my points

Mark,

Why do you call me out, then make "multiple comments, then pick-and-choose which comment I should answer?

You said:

Schpankme, I'm 65 in June.
I grew up with clear skies sans these massive chemtrails
Is it your position that what we are seeing are harmless contrails
My physical evidence is the clouds themselves



My answer to you:

When do Contrails hit the ground?
When do Chemtrails hit the ground?


What precautions do you take to not inhale Contrails?
What precautions do you take to not inhale Chemtrails?


Where is your photos of Contrails laying across the ground?
Where is your photos of Chemtrails laying across the ground?


How do Contrails effect plant life?
How do Chemtrails effect plant life?

Schpankme wrote:

markwilson wrote:

When do Contrails hit the ground? NEVER
When do Chemtrails hit the ground? NEVER

What precautions do you take to not inhale Contrails? NONE
What precautions do you take to not inhale Chemtrails? NONE

Where is your photos of Contrails laying across the ground? NONE
Where is your photos of Chemtrails laying across the ground? NONE

How do Contrails effect plant life? NEVER
How do Chemtrails effect plant life?  NEVER

That's it? No substantive response to my points

Mark,

Why do you call me out, then make "multiple comments, then pick-and-choose which comment I should answer?

You said:

Schpankme, I'm 65 in June.
I grew up with clear skies sans these massive chemtrails
Is it your position that what we are seeing are harmless contrails
My physical evidence is the clouds themselves



My answer to you:

When do Contrails hit the ground?
When do Chemtrails hit the ground?


What precautions do you take to not inhale Contrails?
What precautions do you take to not inhale Chemtrails?


Where is your photos of Contrails laying across the ground?
Where is your photos of Chemtrails laying across the ground?


How do Contrails effect plant life?
How do Chemtrails effect plant life?

And yet you still haven't answered a simple question; where did you get the 16% figure to claim chemtrails are beneficial to agricultural increase? It's a simple question I've now asked at least twice.

And I'm not sure how the conversation was altered, but I'm not the one making the comments you've attributed to me in the below screen grab:



Why does the record now show that misquote attributed to me? It's probably an honest mistake but I have to ask.

The only thing you may quote of mine in that box is, "That's it? No substantive response to my points?!" (even though the question mark/exclamation point was also inadvertently deleted from the quote).

Will you please answer the question as to the source of a 16% agricultural increase due to chemtrails? Since you made the assertion, you must know that chemtrails are more beneficial than contrails in agricultural production, else why claim 16% increase? I'm just curious the source of the assertion to Real World.

Why are you a proponent of obvious particulate matter remaining in the sky in the wake of passing airplanes, going so far as to claim a 16% production increase as a beneficial byproduct of that spraying? You ask for proof; where's yours? Or are we just supposed to all climb on your bandwagon of promoting chemtrails as a benefit to agricultural increase "by 16 % yearly"? Am I misquoting you?

Is it your intention to deny/excuse chemtrails, as opposed to natural contrails which nobody would take exception to?

markwilson wrote:
Is it your intention to deny/excuse chemtrails

"YES, I DENY CHEMTRAILS".




How do Chemtrails effect plant life?
When do Chemtrails hit the ground?
What precautions do you take to not inhale Chemtrails?
Where is your photos of Chemtrails laying across the ground?

markwilson wrote:I'll ask again; where did you get your information that "at the same time" chemtrails are being sprayed, agricultural production is up "by 16% yearly" in direct association with that spraying?

Hi Mark. I believe the point here is how there can be an increase in agricultural production while they are simultaneously spraying the land with poison? If they are indeed spraying us with chemicals we should she effects of this in nature and our environment, don't you agree? So far I haven't seeing proof of this, not with my own eyes and not in the many (fear-mongering) documentaries about this subject - including the one you shared. Maybe I missed it, so I'm happy to hear it if you do have some examples.

And of course I see the trails in the sky - and it's at least suspicious that sometimes I see them for weeks in a row, and after that they seem to disappear for months - but they are by themselves NO PROOF for them spraying chemicals. Remember, almost all fears that are being promoted are based on FICTION, like nukes, terrorism, climate change, viruses and most likely chemtrails and 5G as well.

Besides, if I would want to poison my fellow humans, if would put it in fuel of the cars we drive, not spray it miles up in the air...

Just Vital wrote:

markwilson wrote:I'll ask again; where did you get your information that "at the same time" chemtrails are being sprayed, agricultural production is up "by 16% yearly" in direct association with that spraying?

Hi Mark. I believe the point here is how there can be an increase in agricultural production while they are simultaneously spraying the land with poison? If they are indeed spraying us with chemicals we should she effects of this in nature and our environment, don't you agree? So far I haven't seeing proof of this, not with my own eyes and not in the many (fear-mongering) documentaries about this subject - including the one you shared. Maybe I missed it, so I'm happy to hear it if you do have some examples.

And of course I see the trails in the sky - and it's at least suspicious that sometimes I see them for weeks in a row, and after that they seem to disappear for months - but they are by themselves NO PROOF for them spraying chemicals. Remember, almost all fears that are being promoted are based on FICTION, like nukes, terrorism, climate change, viruses and most likely chemtrails and 5G as well.

Besides, if I would want to poison my fellow humans, if would put it in fuel of the cars we drive, not spray it miles up in the air...

It falls on deaf ears. What did not naturally occur in my youth, now unnaturally happens in my old age. Airplanes used to leave contrails which evaporated timely behind them. Fact. Airplanes now (some, not all, and we can all distinguish between those that do, leaving chemtrails, and those that don't, contrails evaporating timely behind them) spray chemical particulates which waft into chemical, unnatural clouds. Fact. End of interaction.

Hi Mark I will answer your question about agriculture and it has nothing to do with chemtrails. I’m not sure where Schpankme is getting his 16% number from but there is an increase in yield in agriculture. This has to do with two main factors in my opinion. One would be due to the technology used to control water table for a crop. This can be irrigation or drainage or the combination of the two. Over years of researching crops more information is available on what the water level should be during a crop different development stages. Controlling the water table correctly will increase yield due to the plant not being overly stressed while also making sure there is enough stress to have deep enough roots. The second would be due to the no till movement. Tilling soil destroys a healthy soil food web. The tilling destroys most of the hyphae(fungi roots) that form a symbiotic relationship with plant roots due to the exudates the plant roots produce(plants get nutrients and the fungi get sugar). Tilling will cause nutrients to become locked up because they will bond with other elements that won’t be available to the plant’s root system. This nutrients will then get washed away in sediment loss and cause problems down stream such as algae blooms. Farmers will ignorantly keep using more and more fertilizer thinking the soil is depleted of nutrients while in reality the nutrients are there but are just unusable for the plant alone. One of the reasons they have got away with this for so long is because most agricultural soil is bacteria dominated so it’s more of a slow burn effect. Forests are fungi dominated and orchards can either be bacteria or fungi dominated depending on the age of the trees, the older the tree the more fungi dominated the soil is generally speaking. As far as chemtrails effecting plant growth is a ridiculous notion as animal and plant respiratory systems are completely different. That’s an extremely ignorant statement.

Schpankme is one of the main reasons I’m not active on ifers. He has to dominate every conservation, always have the last word, and constantly post the same content that he has already posted multiple times. On this forum alone how many times has he posted well what precautions are you taking against chemtrails? I would guess far over 10 which isn’t an argument of whether they are real or not. I remember when I posted on a forum now deleted about how Orthodox Jewish community in New Jersey have the biggest welfare case in New Jersey. Schpankme responded to my post about how Jews aren’t a race and that somehow I was promoting they were. His post made no logical sense what so ever as I was speaking of a religious group specifically and how they “the chosenites” are committing huge welfare fraud and there is no news coverage of it. They also claim their homes as temples to avoid property taxes but instead he changed the subject instead of focusing on my point. This is a tactic I see him constantly do. Other examples are him repeating the NAZI means national Zionist, theory is just a belief, and penis worship stuff. How many times has he just repeated the same stuff without adding any new research as this is supposed to be a research forum. It’s quite disgusting and I would attribute him as one of the main reasons new members post a few times then never come back. He starts arguments then will just repeat the same thing over and over until the person just never responds back because it’s not worth arguing with some random dude who repeats the same content like a robot.

Lightning_Peasant wrote:
As far as chemtrails effecting plant growth is a ridiculous notion as animal and plant respiratory systems are completely different.
That’s an extremely ignorant statement.

Schpankme is one of the main reasons I’m not active on ifers.

Chemicals such as ALUMINUM and other heavy metals deposited on Plants will kill them.
Chemtrails that never hit the ground are called CONTRAILS.


How do Chemtrails effect plant life?
When do Chemtrails hit the ground?
What precautions do you take to not inhale Chemtrails?
Where is your photos of Chemtrails laying across the ground?

Schpankme wrote:

Chemtrails that never hit the ground are called CONTRAILS.

That's as ignorant a statement as the day is long, frankly. Years ago, when there were only ever contrails in the wake of airplanes (in my youth), and only then when the environmental conditions were such that they were present (altitude, temp, etc.), man didn't worry about where the WATER (condensed water vapor) went, as it evaporated timely behind the aircraft. I still today take no exception to seeing contrails when they are present. You still see them today, which is proof by itself that where a contrail alone is, it is NOT a chemtrail lingering and wafting into unnatural cloud formations. Not all airplanes leave contrails at all altitudes. Natural contrails are not to be confused with chemical spraying resulting in massive manmade cloud systems obscuring the sun. Contrails are polite and quickly evaporate. And since BOTH are present today (contrails that rather quickly evaporate behind the airplane leaving no trace in the sky, and chemtrails that waft and linger forming cloud formations of an unnatural layering), we know that there is A DISTINCT DIFFERENCE BETWEEN CONTRAILS AND CHEMTRAILS.

Point of fact; you proved Lightning_Peasant's point, without a hint of deviation from the habit of repeating yourself over and over in just these last few comments regarding chemtrails. Do you imagine us stupid that you can make a ridiculous statement that one disparate thing is the same as another disparate thing so long as neither "hit the ground," and not be challenged on it?!

Point of fact; if 100 airplanes flew over my position today and left behind only contrails in their wake, the sky would still be clear after each evaporated timely behind the 100 aircraft. If 100 airplanes flew over my position today spraying chemtrails, I wouldn't be able to see the sun, or it would be so obscured like it was yesterday, that it would lose its definition.



Open your eyes and look, friend. Those are not contrails.

markwilson wrote:

Schpankme wrote:

Chemtrails that never hit the ground are called CONTRAILS.

That's as ignorant a statement

Yet, your Chemtrails NEVER enter your nose and NEVER hit the ground. How convenient.

Schpankme wrote:

markwilson wrote:

Schpankme wrote:

Chemtrails that never hit the ground are called CONTRAILS.

That's as ignorant a statement

Yet, your Chemtrails NEVER enter your nose and NEVER hit the ground.  How convenient.

When do people realize that the toxic medications they've been taking deprive them of their good health? Later?

When Christine Todd Whitman (our enemy the State) assured everybody that the toxic concoction of asbestos and other chemicals were perfectly harmless, when did people figure out that she was a liar, and that they weren't perfectly harmless? Later?

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/sep/10/epa-head-wrong-911-air-safe-new-york-christine-todd-whitman

"But of course the “dust lady” was not the only one to feel the effects of the blanket of dust that descended on Manhattan after the towers fell. In the hours, days, and weeks that followed, thousands upon thousands of victims, first responders, emergency personnel, clean up crews, and residents were subjected to the poisonous stew of asbestos, benzene, mercury, lead, cadmium and other particulates from which many are now dying."

https://www.corbettreport.com/911-suspects-christine-todd-whitman/

Do you understand the difference between a contrail that quickly evaporates, and a chemtrail that persists, wafts, and forms unnatural cloud layers?

Schpankme wrote:

susie wrote:
global-warming-spraying-with-aluminum
Monsanto develops Aluminum Resistant biotech seeds[/url]
why the need to develop aluminum resistant seeds

Monsanto, like Noah's Ark, will have their work cutout for them.

"There are about 391,000 species of vascular plants currently known to science"

For without these aluminum resistant plants all plant life on Earth WILL DIE FROM ALUMINUM POISONING.

So are there plants resistant to aluminum or not? Which is bud? You can't seem to get your facts straight. I know there are many plants that can tolerate aluminum. I don't think you understand the difference between ideal conditions and tolerable conditions. Humans can tolerate low amounts of cyanide but that doesn't mean it is ideal. Also, hemp is a great example of a plant that is excellent at removing environmental toxins. I would recommend anyone who can grow it legally to do so to help clean up the environment. As far as what I do myself I fill my home full of house plants so I am at least breathing fresh air at home. I also will be using compost tea and compost to replenish the microbiome that are harmed from aluminum this year. Hell, people used to use aluminum sulfate to lower the pH of soil for blueberry plants all the time. Now it is less popular but still used.

What are you doing to prove imaginary contrails last hours?

Another recommendation I have for any gardeners who read this is to use mycorrhizal fungi. This will fungi will form a symbiotic relationship with a plant's root system and aid in obtaining nutrients, fighting off diseases, and breaking down environmental toxins to make them safe and usable for plants. Fungi will also form glomalin that binds soil particles together. This can transform soil over time to make it more desirable as larger soil particle will create bigger pore spaces helping in aeration and drainage. My theory is that over enough time one would be able to manipulate clay soil into loam soil using different plants depending on the area. UH OH! I said theory I better consult with Schpankme because that means it must be make believe. Why even bother investigating it?!?

I went for my morning walk and lo and behold walking out the door chemtrails were wafting out forming chemical particulate clouds above me. I counted 5 streams. Five airplanes.

Our own eyes, and reason, tell us that two disparate things are not one. We do not need to consult the history books over this matter; we only need to look up.

When we have two disparate things happening, each with its own properties, they are distinguished by those properties. One evaporates timely leaving no trace. One lingers, wafts, forms particulate clouds.

One is not the other.

It is one thing to debate the degree of nefariousness attached to a secret spraying operation and its affects on the populace. It is another level to deny facts demonstrable in nature. We can debate 5G technology, that apparently doesn't like trees in its path, and streetlights, now growing in numbers as computer stations connected to the grid, and what the intent of the government entity employing that technology is, but we won't really know the whole story until LATER.

We don't know the whole story of chemtrails NOW, and we didn't know, and still don't know, the technology of the energy weapon used on 9/11 THEN. That will come LATER, long after the conspirators, enemies domestic, are dead.

Chemtrails are not contrails. When one sees an airplane leaving a well defined, short duration, condensation trail, one is NOT seeing chemical particulates.

I was looking at the moon this morning through a chemical haze. For if they are not chemicals produced at great cost for manufacture and delivery of the agent(s), why was it when I was a youth, nobody was spending untold millions of dollars to spray chemical particulates? Why were the skies clear, except for the neat looking contrails following the airplane because the conditions were just right to see that; and it is that which we STILL see today when an airplane is in those conditions and isn't leaving a a chemical particulate trail hazing my view of the sky.

I don't get angry with natural clouds passing over my head on a moonlit night, I enjoy them. What I saw this morning was NOT natural, and I didn't enjoy the toxic show impairing my vision of the night sky I enjoy gazing at on my early morning walks. One is clean and natural, one is not.

A contrail is NOT a chemtrail.

markwilson wrote:
I went for my morning walk
chemtrails were forming clouds above me
I counted 5 streams
Five airplanes

Chemtrails are not contrails

In your current 'fantasy world' Commercial Jets no longer produce CONTRAILS.

Schpankme wrote:

markwilson wrote:
I went for my morning walk
chemtrails were forming clouds above me
I counted 5 streams
Five airplanes

Chemtrails are not contrails

In your current 'fantasy world' Commercial Jets no longer produce CONTRAILS.

You're resorting now to fallaciously assigning "fantasy world" to your opponent? Is that the best you got?

Did I anywhere indicate that commercial jets no longer produce contrails when conditions are right? I see contrails quite frequently. They evaporate a more or less uniform distance behind the airplane, and do not persist as do chemtrails; i.e., contrails leave the sky in pristine shape once evaporated.

Commercial jets, not belching chemical particulates into the sky, which waft and form chemical clouds, are like any other commercial jet; if the conditions are right they will produce condensation trails which ALWAYS evaporate timely behind them, leaving the sky clear. This point is proved every time any of us see them with our own eyes. Why do you pretend there are no distinguishing properties between the two?

Why are you resorting to a fallacious appeal to ridicule placing me into a fantasy world? I think you have that just backwards, since you don't recognize the clear language in which I delineate two distinct things clearly visible to anybody who pays attention, while you pretend I made an argument I have nowhere made.

Why would you attribute to me something I've never represented as being true? Did you do so purposely?

Cui bono? Who profits? After the overhead of production, delivery, maintenance of equipment, hazmat plaques, hazmat training, etc., who profits? Contrails are free. Chemtrails absolutely are not.

Besides; other than your appeal to ridicule, and deftly misrepresenting my position in one sentence, you now are providing absolutely no substance to support your own position.

Quora has a good disinformation piece you no doubt will enjoy: https://www.quora.com/Why-do-contrails-not-dissipate?share=1

Be sure to play the video underneath their lying article. It's a video of CHEMTRAILS that they, like you, would have us believe are contrails. They are not; but that doesn't stop Quora from conflating the two together anyway.

HERE ARE TWO VIDEOS WITH AIRPLANES OF BOTH VARIETIES IN THE SAME VIDEO (which has been my position throughout):

Difference between Chemtrails and Contrails - this plane has just a normal contrail



The Difference Between A Chemtrail and Contrail- For all the conspiracy nuts out there



So much for your silly argument that a contrail is a chemtrail.

markwilson wrote:
Difference between Chemtrails and Contrails
So much for your silly argument that a contrail is a chemtrail

In the first video the Jet Airplane is not shown (how convenient); let me suggest that the Plane is Military and has no need for TURBOFAN engines like those found on ALL Commercial Jet Airliners.

Hey Mark, it's OK not to inhale Chemtrails, it's OK not to find these white streaks called Chemtrails covering the green landscape, and it's OK to never find that these Chemtrails killing plants.

Deep breath, in with the good air and out with the Chemtrail air.

Chemtrail Poisons are Ruining Your Health from Above, and You may Not Know

https://naturalsociety.com/aluminum-barium-strontium-chemtrail-poisons/

The below documentary is linked to from above article.

What in the World Are They Spraying? (Full Length)

markwilson wrote:
Chemtrail Poisons are Ruining Your Health
/aluminum-barium-strontium-chemtrail-poisons/[/url]

75% of all deaths occur as a result of 10 causes:

1. Heart Disease (Artery Disease); death rate 24%
2. Cancer; death rate 22%
3. Unintentional injuries; death rate 6%
4. Chronic lower respiratory disease (acid reflux); death rate 6%
5. Stroke and cerebrovascular diseases; death rate 6%
6. Alzheimer’s disease; death rate 4%
7. Diabetes (i.e. clogged arteries); death rate 3%
8. Influenza and pneumonia; death rate 2%
9. Kidney disease; death rate 2%
10. Neonatal disorders; death rate 2%

25% of deaths are caused by?

11. Man-made construct called Virus?
12. Chemtrails?
13. Big Foot?
14. Loch Ness Monster?
15. Outer Space Alien Abduction?
16. Black Holes?
...

Inhale the good air and exhale the Chemtrails.  
Hey, is second hand Chemtrails the worst?

Schpankme wrote:

markwilson wrote:
Chemtrail Poisons are Ruining Your Health
/aluminum-barium-strontium-chemtrail-poisons/[/url]

75% of all deaths occur as a result of 10 causes:

1. Heart Disease (Artery Disease); death rate 24%
2. Cancer; death rate 22%
3. Unintentional injuries; death rate 6%
4. Chronic lower respiratory disease (acid reflux); death rate 6%
5. Stroke and cerebrovascular diseases; death rate 6%
6. Alzheimer’s disease; death rate 4%
7. Diabetes (i.e. clogged arteries); death rate 3%
8. Influenza and pneumonia; death rate 2%
9. Kidney disease; death rate 2%
10. Neonatal disorders; death rate 2%

25% of deaths are caused by?

11. Man-made construct called Virus?
12. Chemtrails?
13. Big Foot?
14. Loch Ness Monster?
15. Outer Space Alien Abduction?
16. Black Holes?
...

Inhale the good air and exhale the Chemtrails.  
Hey, is second hand Chemtrails the worst?

Man you are posting stuff before like the robot you are. This same comment is already in another thread so nice copy and paste with a few additional mocking lines.  How about you respond to our points instead of diverting the topic like always. Is heart disease caused by multiple factors or do people just have weak hearts? Is cancer caused by multiple factors or do people just get cancer because of bad luck just like doctor say? Are kids now just suffering due to higher rates of childhood diseases because of bad luck or is there additional reasons? Are lower respiratory disease because of genetic problems or are there multiple factors? Rambling off reasons for death and showing it doesn’t show Nessie or chemtrails doesn’t prove your point. All you are doing is diverting the conversation because you have no point. How about you bring some new knowledge to a research forum instead of your non sensical ramblings.

What goes up must come down, therefore harmful chemicals sprayed in the sky such as aluminum will make their way to the surface due to aluminum’s higher density. Thanks for not responding to my comments before it shows your true colors.

Lightning_Peasant wrote:
How about you respond to our points

YOU MUST PROVE CHEMTRAILS, don't tell me you SEE THEM.

Are you now trying to claim that FAKE CHEMTRAILS cause some of the TOP 10 CAUSES OF DEATH?

Mark Wilson
If you want to leave in state of fear this is your option. I dont need to propagate fear based on Theories like many others. And i dont care how many of you will repeat the same narrative which i hear constantly without any solid evidence, this will not influence me. I know it is handy to be in a group, especially "conspiracy" group, where people will like your post about Popular Porn of Fear and couse of that later you will feel better or something, this is not something what is convincing me. Watching youtube is also not enough for me to accept Chemtrails as a fact. It is a government Psychop, this is how i see it, and Schpankme is right with pointing that to you and others. Its up to you what you will do with those information, but if i was you i would rethink that. I dont have horse in the race, but if you feel you have it, just prove it, or you will be just wasting time.

Lightning_Peasant
If you would be reading with understanding, Schankpame wouldn't need to repost those informations/arguments.
I'm also tired of reading same propaganda without and solid evidence, please have that on mind. Thank you.

A contrail.

I took this quick video with my phone. The airplane is not spraying chemical particulates. Contrails are free (cost nothing) as a byproduct of the airplane was going there anyway. CHEMTRAILS are not free, therefore who profits?, since great expenditures are being spent to pollute with chemicals the sky above us; i.e., chemtrails are not a natural occurrence derivative of airplane flight. The chemical concoction is manufactured, delivered, loaded, sprayed.

This is all clearly laid out in the above video, What in the World Are They Spraying (Full Length).

https://i.imgur.com/a0EO8YL.mp4

Anybody who denies the clear differences between water condensation and persistent chemtrail clouds is denying demonstrable fact to spite the eyes in his head. No matter what else may be said of the subject, it may not be disputed that the two, contrail and chemtrail, are NOT the same, and that the one is costing untold millions in product dispersement, whatever the purpose.

An airplane belching toxins will be forthcoming to highlight the differences between the two.